Shifting Consumption towards Diverse Content on Music Streaming Platforms

Algorithmic recommendations shape music consumption at scale, and understanding the impact of various algorithmic models on how content is consumed is a central question for music streaming platforms. The ability to shift consumption towards less popular content and towards content different from user's typical historic tastes not only affords the platform ways of handling issues such as filter bubbles and popularity bias, but also contributes to maintaining a healthy and sustainable consumption patterns necessary for overall platform success. In this work, we view diversity as an enabler for shifting consumption and consider two notions of music diversity, based on taste similarity and popularity, and investigate how four different recommendation approaches optimized for user satisfaction, fare on diversity metrics. To investigate how the ranker complexity influences diversity, we use two well-known rankers and propose two new models of increased complexity: a feedback aware neural ranker and a reinforcement learning (RL) based ranker. We demonstrate that our models lead to gains in satisfaction, but at the cost of diversity. Such trade-off between model complexity and diversity necessitates the need for explicitly encoding diversity in the modeling process, for which we consider four types of approaches: interleaving based, submodularity based, interpolation, and RL reward modeling based. We find that our reward modeling based RL approach achieves the best trade-off between optimizing the satisfaction metric and surfacing diverse content, thereby enabling consumption shifting at scale. Our findings have implications for the design and deployment of practical approaches for music diversification, which we discuss at length.

[1]  Rui Yan,et al.  Natural Language Inference by Tree-Based Convolution and Heuristic Matching , 2015, ACL.

[2]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[3]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Fairness of Exposure in Rankings , 2018, KDD.

[4]  S. V. N. Vishwanathan,et al.  Diversifying Music Recommendations , 2018, ArXiv.

[5]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification , 2005, WWW '05.

[6]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation , 2012, WSDM '12.

[7]  Lixin Gao,et al.  The impact of YouTube recommendation system on video views , 2010, IMC '10.

[8]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Bandit based Optimization of Multiple Objectives on a Music Streaming Platform , 2020, KDD.

[9]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the trade-off between Relevance, Fairness & Satisfaction in Recommendation Systems , 2018, CIKM.

[10]  Eli Pariser FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden , 2012 .

[11]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[12]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Jointly Leveraging Intent and Interaction Signals to Predict User Satisfaction with Slate Recommendations , 2019, WWW.

[13]  Ronald J. Williams,et al.  Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning , 2004, Machine Learning.

[14]  Tetsuya Sakai,et al.  Which Diversity Evaluation Measures Are "Good"? , 2019, SIGIR.

[15]  Ashton Anderson,et al.  Generalists and Specialists: Using Community Embeddings to Quantify Activity Diversity in Online Platforms , 2019, WWW.

[16]  Jade Goldstein-Stewart,et al.  The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[17]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Recommendations with Negative Feedback via Pairwise Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2018, KDD.

[18]  Punam Bedi,et al.  A Novel Semantic Clustering Approach for Reasonable Diversity in News Recommendations , 2015 .

[19]  Klaas Bosteels,et al.  Music Recommendation and the Long Tail , 2010 .

[20]  Licia Capra,et al.  Temporal diversity in recommender systems , 2010, SIGIR.

[21]  Matevz Kunaver,et al.  Diversity in recommender systems - A survey , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[22]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on Spotify , 2020, WWW.

[23]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[24]  Kartik Hosanagar,et al.  Blockbuster Culture's Next Rise or Fall: The Impact of Recommender Systems on Sales Diversity , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Filip Radlinski,et al.  Comparing the sensitivity of information retrieval metrics , 2010, SIGIR.

[26]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Selecting Sequences of Items via Submodular Maximization , 2017, AAAI.

[27]  Anísio Lacerda,et al.  Multiobjective Pareto-Efficient Approaches for Recommender Systems , 2014, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[28]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[29]  Zheng Wen,et al.  Optimal Greedy Diversity for Recommendation , 2015, IJCAI.

[30]  Choon Hui Teo,et al.  Adaptive, Personalized Diversity for Visual Discovery , 2016, RecSys.

[31]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings , 2018, SIGIR.

[32]  Lucas Maystre,et al.  Contextual and Sequential User Embeddings for Large-Scale Music Recommendation , 2020, RecSys.

[33]  Peter Stone,et al.  DJ-MC: A Reinforcement-Learning Agent for Music Playlist Recommendation , 2014, AAMAS.

[34]  Bert R. Boyce,et al.  Beyond topicality : A two stage view of relevance and the retrieval process , 1982, Inf. Process. Manag..

[35]  Neil J. Hurley,et al.  Incorporating Diversity in a Learning to Rank Recommender System , 2016, FLAIRS.