Optimising end-to-end maritime supply chains: a carbon footprint

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate an optimisation method, and resulting insights, for minimising total logistics-related carbon emissions for end-to-end supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on two real-life UK industrial cases. For the first case, several alternative realistic routes towards the UK are analysed and the optimal route minimising total carbon emissions is identified and tested in real conditions. For the second case, emissions towards several destinations are calculated and two alternative routes to southern Europe are compared, using several transport modes (road, Ro-Ro, rail and maritime). An adapted Value Stream Mapping (VSM) approach is used to map carbon footprint and calculate emissions; in addition Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) data provided information for vessel specification allowing the use of more accurate emission factors for each shipping leg. Findings – The analysis of the first case demonstrates that end-to-end logistics-related carbon emissions can be reduced by 16-21 per cent through direct delivery to the UK as opposed to transhipment via a Continental European port. The analysis of the second case shows that deliveries to southern Europe have the highest potential for reduction through deliveries by sea. Both cases show that for distant overseas destinations, the maritime leg represents the major contributor to CO2 emissions in the end-to-end supply chain. It is notable that one of the main apportionment approaches (that of Defra in the UK) generate higher carbon footprints for routes using Ro-Pax vessels, making those not optimal. The feasibility of the optimal route was demonstrated with real-life data. Originality/value – This research used real-life data from two UK companies and highlighted where carbon emissions are generated in the inbound and outbound transport chain, and how these can be reduced.

[1]  A. McKinnon,et al.  Carbon auditing the "Last Mile": Modelling the environmental impacts of conventional and online non-food shopping , 2009 .

[2]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Learning to see , 1996 .

[3]  Chikage Miyoshi,et al.  The carbon emissions of selected airlines and aircraft types in three geographic markets , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  A definition of 'carbon footprint' [Chapter 1] , 2007 .

[5]  A. McKinnon,et al.  Forecasting the carbon footprint of road freight transport in 2020 , 2010 .

[6]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  Towards greener supply chains: an institutional perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking , 2012 .

[8]  J. Lash,et al.  Competitive advantage on a warming planet. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[9]  Eric G. Olson Better Green Business: Handbook for Environmentally Responsible and Profitable Business Practices , 2009 .

[10]  A. Ramudhin,et al.  Carbon Market Sensitive Green Supply Chain Network Design , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[11]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain , 2010 .

[12]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[13]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  A method for assessing the carbon footprint of maritime freight transport: European case study and results , 2010 .

[14]  A. Posner Learning to see. , 1955, Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly.

[15]  Alan Campbell McKinnon,et al.  Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics , 2010 .