Seeing where you are heading: integrating environmental and egocentric reference frames in cardinal direction judgments.

This research focused on how people coordinate the environmental reference frame of a map with the egocentric reference frame of the forward field of view to make cardinal direction judgments. In 3 studies, reference frame misalignment was found to slow response time for cardinal direction judgments and also markedly decrease accuracy. The studies also showed that people often use a nonrotational, analytic strategy for cardinal direction judgments that has not been identified for other navigational tasks, and that interface aids that improve other navigational tasks seem ineffective for cardinal direction judgments. These findings lead to the recommendation that interface aids for improving cardinal direction judgments should integrate heading information from the environmental reference frame into the egocentric frame (forward view).

[1]  J. M. Dabbs,et al.  Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women , 1998 .

[2]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Herbert L. Pick,et al.  Topographic Map Reading , 1991 .

[4]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[5]  C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity , 1988 .

[6]  Irwin N. Jankovic,et al.  Principles of spatial problem solving. , 1982 .

[7]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[8]  R. Shepard,et al.  Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps , 1984, Cognition.

[9]  J. A. Anthony,et al.  The Mental Rotation of Map Displays , 1992 .

[10]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[11]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Studying Spatial Conceptualization across Cultures: Anthropology and Cognitive Science , 1998 .

[12]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems Theory , 1990 .

[13]  Anthony J. Aretz.  The Design of Electronic Map Displays , 1991 .

[14]  Malcolm G. Eley,et al.  Determining the shapes of landsurfaces from topographical maps , 1988 .

[15]  John B. Haviland,et al.  Guugu Yimithirr Cardinal Directions , 1998 .

[16]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems , 1995 .

[17]  Sholl Mj.  Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987 .

[18]  William K. Estes,et al.  On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals , 1997 .

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[20]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Orientation in cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  G W Evans,et al.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  B. Tversky,et al.  Perspective in Spatial Descriptions , 1996 .