The influence of quality criteria on parents' evaluation of medical web-pages: an Italian randomised trial.

The aim of this study is to verify the usefulness for parents of a web evaluation framework composed of ten quality criteria to improve their ability to assess the quality level of medical web sites. We conducted a randomised controlled trial that included two groups of parents who independently evaluated five paediatric web sites by filling out two distinct questionnaires: group A with the evaluation framework, group B without it. 40 volunteers were recruited from parents referring to the General Paediatrics Out-patients Department who satisfied the following eligibility criteria: Internet users, at least 1 child under 12 months old, no professional skill in Internet and medicine. The survey was taken between February 2, 2000 and March 22, 2000. Parents evaluated each web site and assigned a score, compared with a gold standard created by a group of experts. Suggesting evaluation criteria to parents seem useful for an improvement of their ability to evaluate web sites.

[1]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[2]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  H. Sandvik.  Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence , 1999, BMJ.

[4]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Information in practice Towards quality management of medical information on the internet : evaluation , labelling , and filtering of information , 1998 .

[5]  Maurizio Bonati,et al.  Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[8]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  A D'Atri,et al.  Accessing Information on Medical/Health Web Sites by Italian Families: a Pilot Study , 2000, Clinical pediatrics.

[11]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  P Impicciatore,et al.  Parents on the Web: Risks for Quality Management of Cough in Children , 2000, Pediatrics.

[13]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Surfing for Back Pain Patients: The Nature and Quality of Back Pain Information on the Internet , 2001, Spine.

[14]  H. J. Mcclung,et al.  The Internet as a source for current patient information. , 1998, Pediatrics.