Can Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork Be Managed? Examining the Roles of HRM Systems, Leadership, and Tacit Knowledge

Using a sample of 162 R&D teams, we investigated the influence of HRM systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork on external team knowledge acquisition and internal team knowledge sharing. This study also examined the interactive effect of HRM systems and knowledge tacitness and the combined influence of HRM systems and empowering leadership. HRM systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork were positively associated with team knowledge acquisition and team knowledge sharing. Knowledge tacitness moderated the HRM–knowledge acquisition relationship, reducing the influence of HRM systems. Further, empowering leadership appeared to substitute for the effect of HRM systems. Our findings suggest that an integration of strategic HRM and knowledge teamwork literatures will prove useful for advancing our understanding of knowledge-based competition. Furthermore, by investigating HRM systems and leadership behaviors in tandem, we gain new insights about the interplay between these two important aspects of organizational life.

[1]  J. Storey,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 2016 .

[2]  Lalin Narayan Jha,et al.  Human Resources and the Resource Based View of the Firm , 2014 .

[3]  Sean A. Way,et al.  Boundary Conditions of the High‐Investment Human Resource Systems‐Small‐Firm Labor Productivity Relationship , 2013 .

[4]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Internal and External Networks of Knowledge-Intensive Teams , 2013 .

[5]  Rebecca R. Kehoe,et al.  The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors , 2013 .

[6]  David P. Lepak,et al.  How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[7]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing , 2012 .

[8]  Yuan Jiang,et al.  The Consequences of Educational Specialty and Nationality Faultlines for Project Teams , 2012 .

[9]  Paul S. Hempel,et al.  Team Empowerment and the Organizational Context , 2012 .

[10]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Why a Central Network Position Isn't Enough: The Role of Motivation and Ability for Knowledge Sharing in Employee Networks , 2011 .

[11]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATION, EMPOWERMENT, AND SKILL‐ENHANCING PRACTICES ON AGGREGATE VOLUNTARY TURNOVER: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF COLLECTIVE AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT , 2011 .

[12]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Putting Strategic Human Resource Management in Context: A Contextualized Model of High Commitment Work Systems and Its Implications in China , 2011, Management and Organization Review.

[13]  Bing Bai,et al.  High-performance work systems in foreign subsidiaries of American multinationals: An institutional model , 2011 .

[14]  Steffen Raub,et al.  Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values , 2010 .

[15]  G. Stewart.  The Past Twenty Years: Teams Research Is Alive and Well at the Journal of Management , 2010 .

[16]  H. Liao,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN SERVICE CONTEXT: TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS BY TAKING CARE OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS , 2010 .

[17]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[18]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[19]  J. A. Marrone.  Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future , 2010 .

[20]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes , 2010 .

[21]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Multilevel knowledge and team performance , 2009 .

[22]  Ana Pérez-Luño,et al.  Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity , 2009 .

[23]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Bringing the knowledge perspective into HRM , 2009 .

[24]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[25]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  David P. Lepak,et al.  THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM: CROSS‐LEVEL EFFECTS OF HIGH‐PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS ON EMPLOYEES’ ATTITUDES , 2009 .

[27]  Sankalp Chaturvedi,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Power Distance in the Relationship Between High Performance Work Systems and Employee Attitudes: A Multilevel Perspective , 2009 .

[28]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[29]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[30]  S. Jackson,et al.  Managing Workforce Diversity to Enhance Cooperation in Organizations , 2008 .

[31]  Roderick E. White,et al.  Know‐how transfer: the role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors , 2008 .

[32]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[33]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .

[34]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[35]  M. Zollo,et al.  Interest alignment and competitive advantage , 2007 .

[36]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, And Performance , 2006 .

[37]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis , 2006 .

[38]  S. Jackson,et al.  Toward Developing Human Resource Management Systems for Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork , 2006 .

[39]  David P. Lepak,et al.  A Conceptual Review of Human Resource Management Systems in Strategic Human Resource Management Research , 2006 .

[40]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[41]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[42]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION CONTEXT: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEAM LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[43]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[44]  David C. Coff,et al.  The Knowledge-Leveraging Paradox: How to Achieve Scale without Making Knowledge Imitable , 2006 .

[45]  J. Barney,et al.  Employee Incentives to Make Firm-Specific Investments: Implications for Resource-Based Theories of Corporate Diversification , 2006 .

[46]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[47]  F. Morgeson,et al.  SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[48]  Michael A. West,et al.  Do Organizational Climate and Competitive Strategy Moderate the Relationship Between Human Resource Management and Productivity? , 2005 .

[49]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[50]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[51]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[52]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[53]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[56]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[57]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  APPLYING SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY TO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH , 2003 .

[58]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[59]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[60]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Sean A. Way.  High Performance Work Systems and Intermediate Indicators of Firm Performance Within the US Small Business Sector , 2002 .

[62]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations , 2002 .

[63]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  MANAGING CUSTOMER SERVICES: HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, QUIT RATES, AND SALES GROWTH , 2002 .

[64]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[65]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[66]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Measurement Error in Research on Human Resources and Firm Performance: Additional Data and Suggestions for Future Research , 2001 .

[67]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[69]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[70]  A. Erez,et al.  ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGING TASK CONTEXTS: EFFECTS OF GENERAL COGNITIVE ABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE , 2000 .

[71]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[72]  Marc H. Anderson,et al.  Sources of Managers' Knowledge of Organizational Capabilities , 2000 .

[73]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[74]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[75]  Michael J. Stevens,et al.  Staffing Work Teams: Development and Validation of a Selection Test for Teamwork Settings , 1999 .

[76]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[77]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[78]  John E. Delery.  Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research , 1998 .

[79]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[80]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[81]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[82]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[83]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[84]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[85]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[86]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[87]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[88]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[89]  N. Schmitt.  Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement , 1994 .

[90]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[91]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[92]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals , 1993 .

[93]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[94]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[95]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[96]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[97]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[98]  S. Jackson,et al.  Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices , 1987 .

[99]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[100]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[101]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[102]  Judith Lee Gardner Yeganehlayegh.  On the Relational Perspective , 1981 .

[103]  Charles N. Greene,et al.  The Effects of Formalization on Professional Involvement: A Compensatory Process Approach. , 1981 .

[104]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[105]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[106]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[107]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[108]  W. P. Carey.  CONTINGENCY HYPOTHESES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH : USE , DISUSE , OR MISUSE ? , 2011 .

[109]  J. Paauwe.  HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects , 2009 .

[110]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[111]  P. Wright,et al.  Variability Within Organizations: Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[112]  R. Keller,et al.  Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: a longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[113]  J. Mathieu,et al.  To Empower or Not to Empower Your Sales Force? An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Leadership Empowerment Behavior on Customer Satisfaction and Performance , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[114]  Julian Barling,et al.  High-performance work systems and occupational safety. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[115]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[116]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[117]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[118]  Diane E. Bailey,et al.  KNOWLEDGE AT WORK , 2003 .

[119]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[120]  Gianmario Verona.  A Resource-Based View of Product Development , 1999 .

[121]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[122]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[123]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Participation in decision making: An information exchange perspective. , 1997 .

[124]  S. Jackson,et al.  Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[125]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[126]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[127]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[128]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Moderator Variables in Leadership Research , 1986 .