DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence.

Genomic footprinting has emerged as an unbiased discovery method for transcription factor (TF) occupancy at cognate DNA in vivo. A basic premise of footprinting is that sequence-specific TF-DNA interactions are associated with localized resistance to nucleases, leaving observable signatures of cleavage within accessible chromatin. This phenomenon is interpreted to imply protection of the critical nucleotides by the stably bound protein factor. However, this model conflicts with previous reports of many TFs exchanging with specific binding sites in living cells on a timescale of seconds. We show that TFs with short DNA residence times have no footprints at bound motif elements. Moreover, the nuclease cleavage profile within a footprint originates from the DNA sequence in the factor-binding site, rather than from the protein occupying specific nucleotides. These findings suggest a revised understanding of TF footprinting and reveal limitations in comprehensive reconstruction of the TF regulatory network using this approach.

[1]  Jacob F. Degner,et al.  Sequence and Chromatin Accessibility Data Accurate Inference of Transcription Factor Binding from Dna Material Supplemental Open Access , 2022 .

[2]  X. Xie,et al.  Single Molecule Imaging of Transcription Factor Binding to DNA in Live Mammalian Cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[3]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Detection of factors that interact with the human β-interferon regulatory region in vivo by DNAase I footprinting , 1986, Cell.

[4]  A. Bird,et al.  A Temporal Threshold for Formaldehyde Crosslinking and Fixation , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  David Z. Chen,et al.  Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Shane J. Neph,et al.  Circuitry and Dynamics of Human Transcription Factor Regulatory Networks , 2012, Cell.

[7]  G. Church,et al.  Cell-type-specific contacts to immunoglobulin enhancers in nuclei , 1985, Nature.

[8]  Jeffrey N. McKnight,et al.  Extranucleosomal DNA Binding Directs Nucleosome Sliding by Chd1 , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  Cécile E. Malnou,et al.  Heterodimerization with Different Jun Proteins Controls c-Fos Intranuclear Dynamics and Distribution* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting , 2009, Nature Methods.

[12]  D. Galas,et al.  DNAse footprinting: a simple method for the detection of protein-DNA binding specificity. , 1978, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Adam T. Szafran,et al.  Estrogen-receptor-α exchange and chromatin dynamics are ligand- and domain-dependent , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  R. Pego,et al.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[15]  D. Schübeler,et al.  Determinants and dynamics of genome accessibility , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  J. Bähler.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Genome-wide protein-DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function. , 2012 .

[17]  C. Vinson,et al.  C/EBP maintains chromatin accessibility in liver and facilitates glucocorticoid receptor recruitment to steroid response elements , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[18]  W. Tansey,et al.  The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription? , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[19]  T. Kodadek,et al.  Keeping Transcriptional Activators under Control , 2006, Cell.

[20]  Jason Piper,et al.  Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic Exchange at Regulatory Elements during Chromatin Remodeling Underlies Assisted Loading Mechanism , 2011, Cell.

[22]  Michael J. Guertin,et al.  Transient estrogen receptor binding and p300 redistribution support a squelching mechanism for estradiol-repressed genes. , 2014, Molecular endocrinology.

[23]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Myong-Hee Sung,et al.  Transcription factor AP1 potentiates chromatin accessibility and glucocorticoid receptor binding. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[25]  Peter B. Becker,et al.  Genomic footprinting reveals cell type-specific DNA binding of ubiquitous factors , 1987, Cell.

[26]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Michael J. Guertin,et al.  Mechanisms by which transcription factors gain access to target sequence elements in chromatin. , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[28]  R. Sandstrom,et al.  Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase I , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Gioacchino Natoli,et al.  A hyper‐dynamic equilibrium between promoter‐bound and nucleoplasmic dimers controls NF‐κB‐dependent gene activity , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[30]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[31]  Adam T. Szafran,et al.  Estrogen-receptor-alpha exchange and chromatin dynamics are ligand- and domain-dependent. , 2006, Journal of cell science.

[32]  James G. McNally,et al.  Rapid Glucocorticoid Receptor Exchange at a Promoter Is Coupled to Transcription and Regulated by Chaperones and Proteasomes , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  L. Grøntved,et al.  Rapid genome-scale mapping of chromatin accessibility in tissue , 2012, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[34]  E. Birney,et al.  High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. , 2011, Genome research.

[35]  J. McNally,et al.  A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  M. Zofall,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Changes in Histone-DNA Contacts of Nucleosomes Remodeled by ISW2 , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian network for identifying protein-binding footprints from single molecule-based sequencing data , 2010, Bioinform..

[38]  S. Bekiranov,et al.  Measuring Chromatin Interaction Dynamics on the Second Time Scale at Single-Copy Genes , 2013, Science.

[39]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  A method for mapping intranuclear protein-DNA interactions and its application to a nuclease hypersensitive site. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  G. Hager,et al.  Rapid periodic binding and displacement of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[41]  Tim R. Mercer,et al.  The Human Mitochondrial Transcriptome , 2011, Cell.

[42]  M. Montminy,et al.  Glutamine Rich and Basic Region/Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Domains Stabilize cAMP-response Element-binding Protein (CREB) Binding to Chromatin* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. , 2013, Cell reports.

[44]  S. Mandrup,et al.  Extensive chromatin remodelling and establishment of transcription factor ‘hotspots’ during early adipogenesis , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[45]  J. McNally,et al.  Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[46]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Epigenome characterization at single base-pair resolution , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Single-Molecule Dynamics of Enhanceosome Assembly in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[48]  Shane J. Neph,et al.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints , 2012, Nature.