Innovative Implementation of a Web-Based Rating System for Individualizing Online English Speaking Instruction

The primary goal of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in general, and of online language instruction in particular, is to create and evaluate language learning opportunities. To be effective, online language courses need to be guided by an integrated set of theoretical perspectives to second language acquisition (SLA), as well as by specific curricular goals, learning objectives and outcomes, appropriate tasks and necessary materials, and learners’ characteristics and abilities – to name a few factors that are essential in both online and face-to-face teaching (Xu & Morris, 2007). Doughty and Long (2003) articulate pedagogical principles for computer-enhanced language teaching, which highlight the importance of exercising task-based activities, elaborating the linguistic input, enhancing the learning processes with negative feedback, and individualizing learning. Chapelle (2009) further puts forth a framework of evaluation principles that define the characteristics of tasks and materials drawing on SLA theories. Notably, she remarks that “[t]he groundwork for such evaluation projects is an iterative process of stating ideals for the materials based on the theoretical framework and providing a judgmental analysis of the degree to which the desired features actually appear in the materials” (Chapelle, 2009: 749). In other words, she calls for a judgmental analysis as preevaluation. With regards to online language instruction, pre-evaluation is rather challenging when it comes to individualizing learning in view of learners’ characteristics and abilities, which are different in every iteration

[1]  L. Morris,et al.  Collaborative Course Development for Online Courses , 2007 .

[2]  Jenifer Larson-Hall,et al.  A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS , 2009 .

[3]  E. Jang Diagnostic assessment in language classrooms , 2012, The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing.

[4]  Xiaoming Xi Validating TOEFL® iBT Speaking and Setting Score Requirements for ITA Screening , 2007 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  Cristina Pardo-Ballester,et al.  Measuring Oral Proficiency in Distance, Face-to-Face, and Blended Classrooms , 2008 .

[7]  Paul D. Nichols,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating and Planning Assessments Intended to Improve Student Achievement , 2009 .

[8]  Mike Levy,et al.  A Task-Cycling Pedagogy Using Stimulated Reflection and Audio-Conferencing in Foreign Language Learning , 2004 .

[9]  Michael Levy,et al.  Computer applications in second language acquisition : Foundations for teaching , testing and research , 2009 .

[10]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  The Relationship between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. , 2009 .

[11]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  CALL Evaluation by Developers, a Teacher, and Students , 2013 .

[12]  Lisa M. Volle,et al.  Analyzing Oral Skills in Voice E-Mail and Online Interviews. , 2005 .

[13]  Philip Hubbard,et al.  An Integrated Framework for CALL Courseware Evaluation , 2013 .

[14]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  Language assessment in practice : developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world , 2010 .

[15]  Philip L. Hubbard,et al.  Evaluating CALL Software , 2005 .

[16]  An Investigation Into the Validity of the TOEFL iBT Speaking Test for International Teaching Assistant Certification , 2013 .

[17]  M. Kane Explicating validity , 2016 .

[18]  Janna Fox,et al.  Moderating top-down policy impact and supporting EAP curricular renewal: Exploring the potential of diagnostic assessment , 2009 .

[19]  Erik Voss,et al.  20 Years of Technology and Language Assessment in "Language Learning & Technology". , 2016 .

[20]  Nathan T. Carr,et al.  Designing and Analyzing Language Tests , 2011 .

[21]  Michael H. Long,et al.  OPTIMAL PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR DISTANCE FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2003 .