Cluster analysis of spatial point patterns: posterior distribution of parents inferred from offspring

This manuscript demonstrates an empirical Bayesian estimation of cluster centers (parents) in spatial point pattern. We use the Thomas models on a plane, namely, Neyman–Scott process of a two-dimensional Gaussian-type or its extension to the multi-type species. This manuscript firstly confirms restoration method; namely, the numbers of parents and their locations are estimated from simulated datasets of Thomas process or its multi-type process; and the Metropolis’ simulation of parent locations are well performed from their posterior distributions. Then, we further apply the models to three real datasets of plant ecology, volcano swarms, and inland shallow micro-earthquakes. However, in the latter two cases, a preliminary analysis by the pairwise correlation suggests that the classical second-order moment relationship between the ordinary Thomas process and the Palm intensity cannot be applicable. Therefore, alternative method is implemented by applying a Bayesian selection of the optimal number of parents; which is searched by maximizing the marginal likelihood (integrated posterior) by numerically performing the high-dimensional integration with respective to the location coordinates of the parents. Then, the optimal posterior distribution of the selected model provides the image of likely locations of parents.

[1]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Parameter Estimation and Model Selection for Neyman‐Scott Point Processes , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[2]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[3]  Mitsuhiro Matsu'ura,et al.  The 3‐D tectonic stress fields in and around Japan inverted from centroid moment tensor data of seismic events , 2010 .

[4]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns , 1988 .

[5]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[6]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Likelihood estimation of soft-core interaction potentials for Gibbsian point patterns , 1989 .

[7]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Estimating Pair Correlation Functions of Planar Cluster Processes , 1996 .

[8]  C. Geyer Markov Chain Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood , 1991 .

[9]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Identification and estimation of superposed Neyman–Scott spatial cluster processes , 2014 .

[10]  Hirotugu Akaike,et al.  Likelihood and the Bayes procedure , 1980 .

[11]  Y. Ogata A Monte Carlo method for high dimensional integration , 1989 .

[12]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Estimation of Interaction Potentials of Marked Spatial Point Patterns Through the Maximum Likelihood Method , 1985 .

[13]  M. Thomas A generalization of Poisson's binomial limit for use in ecology. , 1949, Biometrika.

[14]  Masatake Mori,et al.  Quadrature formulas obtained by variable transformation , 1973 .

[15]  E. B. Jensen,et al.  Asymptotic Palm likelihood theory for stationary point processes , 2013 .

[16]  D. Vere-Jones Stochastic Models for Earthquake Occurrence , 1970 .

[17]  R. Waagepetersen,et al.  Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * , 2007 .

[18]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Exploratory analysis of earthquake clusters by likelihood-based trigger models , 2001, Journal of Applied Probability.

[19]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Estimation of interaction potentials of spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood procedure , 1981 .

[20]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns , 2000 .

[21]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[22]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[23]  Y. Ogata A Monte Carlo method for an objective Bayesian procedure , 1990 .

[24]  R. Waagepetersen An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes , 2007, Biometrics.

[25]  J. Møller,et al.  Log Gaussian Cox Processes , 1998 .

[26]  A. Baddeley,et al.  A non-parametric measure of spatial interaction in point patterns , 1996, Advances in Applied Probability.

[27]  M. N. M. Lieshout,et al.  ADRIAN BADDELEY, EGE RUBAK, AND ROLF TURNER, Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press , 2016 .

[28]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[29]  L. Adamopoulos Cluster models for earthquakes: Regional comparisons , 1976 .

[30]  B. Ripley Modelling Spatial Patterns , 1977 .

[31]  D. García-Castellanos,et al.  Lithospheric structure of the Gorringe Bank: Insights into its origin and tectonic evolution , 2010 .

[32]  C. Geyer,et al.  Constrained Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood for Dependent Data , 1992 .

[33]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[34]  D. Vere-Jones,et al.  A statistical survey of earthquakes in the main seismic region of New Zealand: Part 2—Time series analyses , 1966 .

[35]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Likelihood Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns , 1984 .

[36]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Modelling heterogeneous space–time occurrences of earthquakes and its residual analysis , 2003 .

[37]  J. Neyman,et al.  Statistical Approach to Problems of Cosmology , 1958 .

[38]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R , 2015 .

[39]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[40]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Comparison of Two Methods for Calculating the Partition Functions of Various Spatial Statistical Models , 2001 .

[41]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Polynomial-Time Approximation Algorithms for the Ising Model , 1990, SIAM J. Comput..

[42]  I. Good Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities , 1971 .

[43]  A. Raftery,et al.  Estimating Bayes Factors via Posterior Simulation with the Laplace—Metropolis Estimator , 1997 .

[44]  Y. Ogata Evaluation of spatial Bayesian models—Two computational methods☆ , 1996 .