Asymptotic powers for matched trend tests and robust matched trend tests in case-control genetic association studies

The matched trend test (MTT), developed using a conditional logistic regression, has been proposed to test for association in matched case-control studies to control the bias of known confounding effects and reduce the potential impact of population stratification. The MTT requires a known genetic model. When the genetic model is unknown, a Monte Carlo robust test, MAX, has been proposed for the analysis of matched case-control studies. The MAX statistic takes the maximum of three MTTs optimal for three common genetic models. We derive the asymptotic power for MTTs and robust tests. In particular, we derive the asymptotic p-value for MAX. Using these analytical results, we conduct simulation studies to compare the performance of MAX and the two-degree-of-freedom Chi-square test for matched case-control studies, where the latter is implemented in most computing software. Our simulation results show that MAX is always asymptotically more powerful than the two-degree-of-freedom Chi-square test under common genetic models. Our results provide guidelines for the analysis of genetic association using matched case-control data. An illustration of our results to a real matched pair case-control etiologic study of sarcoidosis is given.

[1]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Statistical methods for haplotype‐based matched case‐control association studies , 2007, Genetic epidemiology.

[2]  Jinbo Chen,et al.  Conditional Likelihood Methods for Haplotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Matched Case–Control Data , 2007, Biometrics.

[3]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[4]  N Breslow,et al.  Covariance adjustment of relative-risk estimates in matched studies. , 1982, Biometrics.

[5]  N. Day,et al.  Testing hypotheses in case-control studies--equivalence of Mantel-Haenszel statistics and logit score tests. , 1979, Biometrics.

[6]  Qizhai Li,et al.  Efficient Approximation of P‐value of the Maximum of Correlated Tests, with Applications to Genome‐Wide Association Studies , 2008, Annals of human genetics.

[7]  J. Hirschhorn,et al.  Genetic model testing and statistical power in population‐based association studies of quantitative traits , 2007, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  P. Sasieni.  From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. , 1997, Biometrics.

[9]  U. Vogel,et al.  Association of DNA repair gene XRCC1 and lung cancer susceptibility among nonsmoking Chinese women. , 2009, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[10]  Wen-Chung Lee.  Case‐control association studies with matching and genomic controlling , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[11]  Z. Li,et al.  MAX-rank: a simple and robust genome-wide scan for case-control association studies , 2008, Human Genetics.

[12]  Wentian Li,et al.  Exploring case-control genetic association tests using phase diagrams , 2009, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[13]  G. Zheng,et al.  Robust trend tests for genetic association using matched case‐control design , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  R. Baughman.  Design of a case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis (ACCESS). ACCESS Research Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  Manal M. Hassan,et al.  Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Gene Polymorphisms Alone or In Interaction with Diabetes on the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  Xavier Estivill,et al.  Maximizing association statistics over genetic models , 2008, Genetic epidemiology.

[17]  Day Ne,et al.  Testing hypotheses in case-control studies--equivalence of Mantel-Haenszel statistics and logit score tests. , 1979 .

[18]  D. Schaid,et al.  Case-Control Studies of Genetic Markers: Power and Sample Size Approximations for Armitage’s Test for Trend , 2001, Human Heredity.

[19]  T. Hudson,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature.

[20]  David Reich,et al.  Discerning the Ancestry of European Americans in Genetic Association Studies , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[21]  H. Ury,et al.  Comparison of Four Procedures for Multiple Comparisons Among Means (Pairwise Contrasts) for Arbitrary Sample Sizes , 1976 .

[22]  J. Srisomboon,et al.  Association between Bcl-2 expression and tumor recurrence in cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  D. Allison,et al.  Review and Evaluation of Methods Correcting for Population Stratification with a Focus on Underlying Statistical Principles , 2008, Human Heredity.

[24]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: A comparison of simple and flexible techniques , 2005, Genetic epidemiology.

[25]  H K Ury,et al.  Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data. , 1975, Biometrics.

[26]  Joseph L. Gastwirth,et al.  Trend Tests for Case-Control Studies of Genetic Markers: Power, Sample Size and Robustness , 2002, Human Heredity.

[27]  J. Gastwirth,et al.  Robust genomic control for association studies. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Joseph L. Gastwirth,et al.  The Use of Maximin Efficiency Robust Tests in Combining Contingency Tables and Survival Analysis , 1985 .