Incentives to reliable order fulfillment for an Internet drop-shipping supply chain

In this paper, we analyze the interaction between revenue sharing and quality of order fulfillment that occurs in an Internet drop-shipping distribution system comprising an e-tailer and a supplier. The e-tailer manages sales activities and sends customer orders to the supplier, while the supplier fulfills the order. With drop-shipping strategy, the e-tailer cannot monitor or control the supplier's shipping operations and takes the risk of loss due to the supplier's inefficient deliveries. Using a Stackelberg game, we explore how the e-tailer (leader) can give the supplier (follower) appropriate incentive to improve the level of delivery reliability. We also address whether and when the supplier is willing to share its private cost information with the e-tailer. Since the e-tailer is always better off by knowing the supplier's private information, we study three possible strategies for the e-tailer to extract more accurate cost information from the supplier. Among them, we find that strategic partnership and utilization of information leakage are feasible strategies while a side payment is not.

[1]  A. Lau,et al.  Considering asymmetrical manufacturing cost information in a two-echelon system that uses price-only contracts , 2006 .

[2]  E. Brousseau,et al.  The Economics of Contracts: Bibliography , 2002 .

[3]  Weiyu Tsai,et al.  New Product Introduction: Timing, Design, and Pricing , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  Internet book retailing and supply chain management: an analytical study of inventory location speculation and postponement , 2005 .

[5]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[6]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Supply Chain Structures on the Internet , 2004 .

[7]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  Consumer direct fulfillment performance in Internet retailing : emergency transshipments and demand dispersion , 2005 .

[8]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Inventory rationing via drop-shipping in Internet retailing: A sensitivity analysis , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Modeling the design quality competition for durable products , 1999 .

[10]  M. Parlar,et al.  Game Theoretic Applications in Supply Chain Management: A Review , 2005 .

[11]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[12]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The evaluation of drop shipping option for e-commerce retailers☆ , 2001 .

[13]  James D. Broesch 8 – Variations on the Theme , 1991 .

[14]  Hongtao Zhang VERTICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN A SUPPLY CHAIN WITH DUOPOLY RETAILERS , 2002 .

[15]  P. Dutta Strategies and Games: Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[16]  Albert Y. Ha Supplier‐buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation , 2001 .

[17]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science) , 2004 .

[18]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Note. the Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Goods , 1998 .

[19]  Nils Rudi,et al.  Supply Chain Choice on the Internet , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Nicholas T. Scheel Drop Shipping as a Marketing Function: A Handbook of Methods and Policies , 1990 .

[21]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Hongtao Zhang,et al.  Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination , 2005 .

[23]  Lode Li Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition , 2002, Manag. Sci..