2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Progress in endoscopic surgery in the past few decades has led to the application of 3-dimensional (3D) procedures in operating rooms. This permits patient- and surgeon-friendly operations and also maximizes the superiority of laparoscopy over laparotomy. In this study, we compare 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D endoscopy techniques with regard to time, efficiency, optics, and handling by users with different degrees of experience at 4 difficulty levels. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps for students and postgraduates. SETTING The trials took place at the Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, a training unit of the Kiel University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, a tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS The 277 study participants, divided into students, residents, and specialists, worked on pelvitrainers with 2 different optical systems, the 2D full HD and the 3D mode. The following 4 exercises were performed with each optical system: (1) grasping and transferring of pins, (2) cutting predetermined marks, (3) vaginal closure with prevention of prolapse, and (4) sacrocolpopexy. The duration and success of the tasks were measured and compared. A self-assessment questionnaire was completed by the participants. RESULTS Overall, the 3D-system permitted a greater improvement in working speed, superior optical visualization, and better endoscopic handling in all groups, independent of surgical experience. All students improved in speed (exercises: 1-3) and made significantly fewer mistakes (exercise 2) on 3D compared with 2D. Residents made progress in time (exercises: 1-4) and task performance (exercise 3). Specialists improved significantly in the more challenging tasks 3 and 4. Subjectively, 68.8% of participants preferred 3D for performing laparoscopy. CONCLUSION Systematic training programs on pelvitrainers can improve endoscopic skills not only in beginners but also in experienced surgeons. The 3D system offered distinct advantages over 2D imaging and was well accepted by surgeons.

[1]  R. Autorino,et al.  Three-dimensional Technology Facilitates Surgical Performance of Novice Laparoscopy Surgeons: A Quantitative Assessment on a Porcine Kidney Model. , 2015, Urology.

[2]  P. Stieg,et al.  Dual-Port 2D and 3D Endoscopy: Expanding the Limits of the Endonasal Approaches to Midline Skull Base Lesions with Lateral Extension , 2014, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part B.

[3]  Martin Lacher,et al.  Erratum to: 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  NavarraGiuseppe,et al.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant? , 2015 .

[5]  I. Alkatout Communicative and Ethical Aspects of the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Extreme Situations , 2018 .

[6]  Ferdinando Fusco,et al.  Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. , 2013, Urology.

[7]  R. Li,et al.  Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy: evaluation of physicians' performance and preference using a pelvic trainer. , 2015, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[8]  Jun Zhou,et al.  A Comparative Study of Distinct Ocular Symptoms After Performing Laparoscopic Surgical Tasks Using a Three-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System and a Conventional Two-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[9]  Lars Konge,et al.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  J. Fuchs,et al.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in children and adults: A prospective clinical trial , 2015, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  G. Andriole,et al.  2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. , 2012, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[12]  Shahzad Ahmed,et al.  Three-Dimensional Hand-to-Gland Combat: The Future of Endoscopic Surgery? , 2015, Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports.

[13]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Three-dimensional Neurostereoendoscopy: Subjective and Objective Comparison to 2D , 2009, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[14]  Liselotte Mettler,et al.  Integration and Validation of Hysteroscopy Simulation in the Surgical Training Curriculum. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[15]  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer , 2014, Oncology letters.

[16]  G. Antoniou,et al.  Past, Present, and Future of Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery , 2015, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[17]  Giuseppe Navarra,et al.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant? , 2015, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[18]  Andrea Ghedi,et al.  3D vs 2D laparoscopic systems: Development of a performance quantitative validation model , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  M O Schurr,et al.  3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. , 1993, Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies.

[20]  P. Stieg,et al.  A combined dual-port endoscope-assisted pre- and retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle: an extensive anatomo-surgical study , 2014, Neurosurgical Review.

[21]  H. Feussner,et al.  Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  Yanlei Ma,et al.  Laparoscopy or not: A Meta-analysis of the Surgical Effects of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy , 2010, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[23]  A Ashraf,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[24]  L. Mettler,et al.  Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Prolapse: A Multiprocedural Concept , 2014, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[25]  L. Mettler,et al.  Imaging in Gynecologic Surgery , 2011, Women's health.

[26]  J. Ito,et al.  Efficacy of three-dimensional endoscopy in endonasal surgery. , 2015, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[27]  M. Hashizume,et al.  Novel, high‐definition 3‐D endoscopy system with real‐time compression communication system to aid diagnoses and treatment between hospitals in Thailand , 2015, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[28]  Martin Lacher,et al.  3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[29]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Three-dimensional high-definition neuroendoscopic surgery: a controlled comparative laboratory study with two-dimensional endoscopy and clinical application. , 2013, Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery.

[30]  Ibrahim Alkatout,et al.  [Communicative and ethical aspects of physician-patient relationship in extreme situations]. , 2015, Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift.

[31]  F. Le Pimpec Barthès,et al.  Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems †. , 2014, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[32]  Xinyang Liu,et al.  Visualization of the Supraglottis in Laryngomalacia With 3-Dimensional Pediatric Endoscopy. , 2016, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[33]  P. Kallidonis,et al.  Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy? , 2015, Lasers in Medical Science.