Evaluation of errors made in solar irradiance estimation due to averaging the Angstrom turbidity coefficient

Abstract Even though the monitoring of solar radiation experienced a vast progress in the recent years both in terms of expanding the measurement networks and increasing the data quality, the number of stations is still too small to achieve accurate global coverage. Alternatively, various models for estimating solar radiation are exploited in many applications. Choosing a model is often limited by the availability of the meteorological parameters required for its running. In many cases the current values of the parameters are replaced with daily, monthly or even yearly average values. This paper deals with the evaluation of the error made in estimating global solar irradiance by using an average value of the Angstrom turbidity coefficient instead of its current value. A simple equation relating the relative variation of the global solar irradiance and the relative variation of the Angstrom turbidity coefficient is established. The theoretical result is complemented by a quantitative assessment of the errors made when hourly, daily, monthly or yearly average values of the Angstrom turbidity coefficient are used at the entry of a parametric solar irradiance model. The study was conducted with data recorded in 2012 at two AERONET stations in Romania. It is shown that the relative errors in estimating global solar irradiance (GHI) due to inadequate consideration of Angstrom turbidity coefficient may be very high, even exceeding 20%. However, when an hourly or a daily average value is used instead of the current value of the Angstrom turbidity coefficient, the relative errors are acceptably small, in general less than 5%. All results prove that in order to correctly reproduce GHI for various particular aerosol loadings of the atmosphere, the parametric models should rely on hourly or daily Angstrom turbidity coefficient values rather than on the more usual monthly or yearly average data, if currently measured data is not available.

[1]  D. Mihailovic,et al.  The use of NEOPLANTA model for evaluating the UV index in the Vojvodina region (Serbia) , 2011 .

[2]  R. Perez,et al.  Effective Accuracy of Satellite-Derived Hourly Irradiances , 1999 .

[3]  P. Ineichen Comparison of eight clear sky broadband models against 16 independent data banks , 2006 .

[4]  Viorel Badescu,et al.  New approach to measure the stability of the solar radiative regime , 2011 .

[5]  Christian A. Gueymard,et al.  Temporal variability in direct and global irradiance at various time scales as affected by aerosols , 2012 .

[6]  Z. Schlett,et al.  A simplified but accurate spectral solar irradiance model , 2003 .

[7]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[8]  Thomas S. Pagano,et al.  Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  Viorel Badescu,et al.  Computing global and diffuse solar hourly irradiation on clear sky. Review and testing of 54 models , 2012 .

[10]  M. Paulescu,et al.  Influence of aerosols pollution on the amount of collectable solar energy , 2013 .

[11]  D. Djafer,et al.  Estimation of atmospheric turbidity over Ghardaïa city , 2013 .

[12]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Comparison of Cloudless Sky Parameterizations of Solar Irradianceat Various Spanish Midlatitude Locations , 2000 .

[13]  Nobuyuki Tamai,et al.  A hybrid model for estimating global solar radiation , 2001 .

[14]  Pramod K. Pandey,et al.  A new method to estimate average hourly global solar radiation on the horizontal surface , 2012 .

[15]  Viorel Badescu,et al.  Weather Modeling and Forecasting of PV Systems Operation , 2012 .

[16]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[17]  G. G. Palancar,et al.  Using the optical properties of aerosols from the AERONET database to calculate surface solar UV-B irradiance in Córdoba, Argentina : Comparison with measurements , 2008 .

[18]  Kun Yang,et al.  Improving estimation of hourly, daily, and monthly solar radiation by importing global data sets , 2006 .

[19]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[20]  P. Ineichen,et al.  A new airmass independent formulation for the Linke turbidity coefficient , 2002 .

[21]  T. McMahon,et al.  Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2007 .

[22]  Roberto Román,et al.  Turbidity coefficients from normal direct solar irradiance in Central Spain , 2014 .

[23]  Z. Schlett,et al.  Performance assessment of global solar irradiation models under Romanian climate , 2004 .

[24]  Serm Janjai,et al.  Semi-empirical models for the estimation of clear sky solar global and direct normal irradiances in the tropics , 2011 .

[25]  Determination of Atmospheric Turbidity and its Correlation with Climatologically Parameters , 2012 .

[26]  M. El-Metwally,et al.  Simple new methods to estimate global solar radiation based on meteorological data in Egypt , 2004 .

[27]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Assessment of the Level-3 MODIS daily aerosol optical depth in the context of surface solar radiation and numerical weather modeling , 2012 .

[28]  M. El-Metwally Indirect determination of broadband turbidity coefficients over Egypt , 2012, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[29]  P. Ineichen,et al.  Comparison of Direct Normal Irradiation Maps for Europe , 2009 .

[30]  A. Ångström,et al.  Techniques of Determinig the Turbidity of the Atmosphere , 1961 .

[31]  L. Wald,et al.  On the clear sky model of the ESRA — European Solar Radiation Atlas — with respect to the heliosat method , 2000 .

[32]  M. El-Metwally,et al.  Comparative study on different models for estimation of direct normal irradiance (DNI) over Egypt atmosphere , 2006 .

[33]  Sasha Madronich,et al.  Theoretical Estimation of Biologically Effective UV Radiation at the Earth’s Surface , 1997 .

[34]  Miroslav Trnka,et al.  Effect of Estimated Daily Global Solar Radiation Data on the Results of Crop Growth Models , 2007, Sensors.