THE EFFECTS OF THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT AND STELLAR MASS ON GALAXY QUENCHING TO z ∼ 3
暂无分享,去创建一个
B. Mobasher | P. Capak | A. Faisst | N. Scoville | D. Sobral | B. Darvish | A. Rettura
[1] P. Hopkins,et al. How Stellar Feedback Simultaneously Regulates Star Formation and Drives Outflows , 2015, 1510.05650.
[2] O. Fèvre,et al. THE COSMOS2015 CATALOG: EXPLORING THE 1 < z < 6 UNIVERSE WITH HALF A MILLION GALAXIES , 2016, 1604.02350.
[3] D. Sobral,et al. The nature of Hα star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 0.4 in and around Cl 0939+4713: the environment matters , 2016, 1603.00462.
[4] S. Genel. HOW ENVIRONMENT AFFECTS GALAXY METALLICITY THROUGH STRIPPING AND FORMATION HISTORY: LESSONS FROM THE ILLUSTRIS SIMULATION , 2016, 1602.02773.
[5] A. Cimatti,et al. Non-linearity and environmental dependence of the star-forming galaxies main sequence , 2015, 1511.01899.
[6] P. Norberg,et al. ZENS. IV. SIMILAR MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH MASS QUENCHING AND ENVIRONMENT QUENCHING AND THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF BULGE GROWTH VERSUS THE FADING OF DISKS , 2014, 1402.1172.
[7] B. Garilli,et al. The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Environmental effects shaping the galaxy stellar mass function , 2015, 1511.01145.
[8] B. Mobasher,et al. SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN FILAMENTS AND THE FIELD AT z ∼ 0.5: EVIDENCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DEPENDENCE OF ELECTRON DENSITY , 2015, 1510.05009.
[9] W. Everett,et al. Probing star formation in the dense environments of z 1 lensing haloes aligned with dusty star-forming galaxies detected with the South Pole Telescope , 2015, 1510.01359.
[10] R. Demarco,et al. EVIDENCE FOR THE UNIVERSALITY OF PROPERTIES OF RED-SEQUENCE GALAXIES IN X-RAY- AND RED-SEQUENCE-SELECTED CLUSTERS AT z ∼ 1 , 2015, 1510.00104.
[11] A. Cimatti,et al. Reconstructing the galaxy density field with photometric redshifts: I. Methodology and validation on stellar mass functions , 2015, 1509.08964.
[12] L. Kewley,et al. ZFIRE: GALAXY CLUSTER KINEMATICS, Hα STAR FORMATION RATES, AND GAS PHASE METALLICITIES OF XMM-LSS J02182-05102 AT z cl = 1.6233 ?> , 2015, 1508.03057.
[13] M. Peth,et al. EVOLUTION OF STAR FORMATION PROPERTIES OF HIGH-REDSHIFT CLUSTER GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 , 2015, 1508.01294.
[14] A. Coil,et al. THE MOSDEF SURVEY: DISSECTING THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION USING Hα AND Hβ EMISSION LINES AT z ∼ 2 , 2015, 1507.03017.
[15] D. Schneider,et al. SURVEYING GALAXY PROTO-CLUSTERS IN EMISSION: A LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE AT z = 2.44 AND THE OUTLOOK FOR HETDEX , 2015, 1505.03877.
[16] B. Mobasher,et al. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DENSITY FIELD ESTIMATION FOR GALAXIES: NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES WITH ENVIRONMENT IN COSMOS OUT TO z ∼ 3 , 2015, 1503.07879.
[17] H. Rottgering,et al. MC2: boosted AGN and star formation activity in CIZA J2242.8+5301, a massive post-merger cluster at z = 0.19 , 2015, 1503.02076.
[18] I. Smail,et al. Evolution of the H β + [O iii] and [O ii] luminosity functions and the [O ii] star formation history of the Universe up to z ∼ 5 from HiZELS , 2015, 1503.00004.
[19] Gepi,et al. AVOIDING PROGENITOR BIAS: THE STRUCTURAL AND MASS EVOLUTION OF BRIGHTEST GROUP AND CLUSTER GALAXIES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELS SINCE z ≲ 1 , 2015, 1501.02800.
[20] D. Elbaz,et al. The reversal of the SF–density relation in a massive, X-ray-selected galaxy cluster at z = 1.58: results from Herschel , 2014, 1412.5188.
[21] A. Fontana,et al. Deconstructing the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function with UKIDSS and CANDELS: The Impact of Colour, Structure and Environment , 2014, 1411.3339.
[22] H. Hoekstra,et al. The rise and fall of star formation in z ~ 0.2 merging galaxy clusters , 2014, 1410.2891.
[23] C. Conselice,et al. Galactic conformity and central/satellite quenching, from the satellite profiles of M* galaxies at 0.4 < z < 1.9 in the UKIDSS UDS , 2014, 1406.6058.
[24] Ichi Tanaka,et al. An early phase of environmental effects on galaxy properties unveiled by near-infrared spectroscopy of protocluster galaxies at z > 2 , 2014, 1406.5219.
[25] R. Dav'e,et al. Hot gas in massive haloes drives both mass quenching and environment quenching , 2014, 1405.1043.
[26] M. Blanton,et al. PRIMUS: EFFECTS OF GALAXY ENVIRONMENT ON THE QUIESCENT FRACTION EVOLUTION AT z < 0.8 , 2014, 1412.7162.
[27] G. Gavazzi,et al. On the origin of the faint-end of the red sequence in high-density environments , 2014, 1411.5513.
[28] A. Cava,et al. The star formation activity in cosmic voids , 2014, 1410.0023.
[29] I. Smail,et al. COSMIC WEB AND STAR FORMATION ACTIVITY IN GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 , 2014, 1409.7695.
[30] A. Fontana,et al. A STUDY OF MASSIVE AND EVOLVED GALAXIES AT HIGH REDSHIFT , 2014, 1408.3684.
[31] S. Lilly,et al. QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY GROUPS: CENTRALS, SATELLITES, AND GALACTIC CONFORMITY , 2014, 1408.2553.
[32] O. Cucciati,et al. The influence of the environmental history on quenching star formation in a Λ cold dark matter universe , 2014, 1407.5621.
[33] S. E. Persson,et al. THE DISTRIBUTION OF SATELLITES AROUND MASSIVE GALAXIES AT 1 < z < 3 IN ZFOURGE/CANDELS: DEPENDENCE ON STAR FORMATION ACTIVITY , 2014, 1406.6056.
[34] Ž. Ivezić,et al. THE ANGULAR CLUSTERING OF WISE-SELECTED ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: DIFFERENT HALOS FOR OBSCURED AND UNOBSCURED ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI , 2014 .
[35] M. Hayashi,et al. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ON THE STAR FORMATION MAIN SEQUENCE: AN Hα STUDY OF THE NEWLY DISCOVERED RICH CLUSTER AT z = 1.52 , 2014, 1405.4165.
[36] V. Springel,et al. Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation , 2014, Nature.
[37] M. Balogh,et al. The connection between galaxy structure and quenching efficiency , 2014, 1402.3394.
[38] I. Smail,et al. Mapping the large-scale structure around a z=1.46 galaxy cluster in 3D using two adjacent narrow-band filters , 2014, 1401.3919.
[39] P. Norberg,et al. THE PAN-STARRS1 MEDIUM-DEEP SURVEY: THE ROLE OF GALAXY GROUP ENVIRONMENT IN THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION AND QUIESCENT FRACTION OUT TO z ∼ 0.8 , 2013, 1312.4736.
[40] R. Cen. ON THE ORIGIN OF THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE: I. INSIGHTS ON GALAXY COLOR MIGRATION FROM COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS , 2013, 1311.5916.
[41] P. Hopkins,et al. Galaxies on FIRE (Feedback In Realistic Environments): stellar feedback explains cosmologically inefficient star formation , 2013, 1311.2073.
[42] I. Smail,et al. The stellar mass function of star-forming galaxies and the mass-dependent SFR function since z = 2.23 from HiZELS , 2013, 1311.1503.
[43] Stefano Andreon,et al. SPECTROSCOPIC CONFIRMATION OF THE RICH z = 1.80 GALAXY CLUSTER JKCS 041 USING THE WFC3 GRISM: ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDS IN THE AGES AND STRUCTURE OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2013, 1310.6754.
[44] A. Cimatti,et al. Reversal or no reversal: the evolution of the star formation rate–density relation up to z ∼ 1.6 , 2013, 1310.1398.
[45] R. Muñoz,et al. Larger sizes of massive quiescent early-type galaxies in clusters than in the field at 0.8 < z < 1.5 , 2013, 1307.0003.
[46] M. Dickinson,et al. Cosmic Star-Formation History , 1996, 1403.0007.
[47] E. I. Robson,et al. THE SCUBA-2 COSMOLOGY LEGACY SURVEY: ULTRALUMINOUS STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN A z = 1.6 CLUSTER , 2013, 1312.3329.
[48] C. Conselice,et al. Evidence for a correlation between the sizes of quiescent galaxies and local environment to z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1307.3247.
[49] C. Collins,et al. Growth of brightest cluster galaxies via mergers since z = 1 , 2013, 1307.1702.
[50] A. Finoguenov,et al. LoCuSS: THE STEADY DECLINE AND SLOW QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN CLUSTER GALAXIES OVER THE LAST FOUR BILLION YEARS , 2013, 1307.1135.
[51] Yen-Ting Lin,et al. THE STELLAR MASS GROWTH OF BRIGHTEST CLUSTER GALAXIES IN THE IRAC SHALLOW CLUSTER SURVEY , 2013, 1305.5254.
[52] A. Cimatti,et al. GALAXY EVOLUTION IN OVERDENSE ENVIRONMENTS AT HIGH REDSHIFT: PASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES IN A CLUSTER AT z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1305.3577.
[53] Qi Guo,et al. EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES AND THEIR ENVIRONMENTS AT z = 0.1–3 IN COSMOS , 2013, 1303.6689.
[54] P. Martini,et al. THE CLUSTER AND FIELD GALAXY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS FRACTION AT z = 1–1.5: EVIDENCE FOR A REVERSAL OF THE LOCAL ANTICORRELATION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENT AND AGN FRACTION , 2013, 1302.6253.
[55] A. M. Swinbank,et al. On the evolution and environmental dependence of the star formation rate versus stellar mass relation since z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1302.5315.
[56] Y. Mellier,et al. Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z ≃ 4 from UltraVISTA , 2013, 1301.3157.
[57] J. Tinker,et al. Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: satellite star formation histories and quenching time-scales in a hierarchical Universe , 2012, 1206.3571.
[58] Michele Cirasuolo,et al. A large Hα survey at z = 2.23, 1.47, 0.84 and 0.40: the 11 Gyr evolution of star-forming galaxies from HiZELS , 2012, 1202.3436.
[59] B. Garilli,et al. THE COLORS OF CENTRAL AND SATELLITE GALAXIES IN zCOSMOS OUT TO z ≃ 0.8 AND IMPLICATIONS FOR QUENCHING , 2012, 1211.5607.
[60] H. Hoekstra,et al. Evidence for Significant Growth in the Stellar Mass of Brightest Cluster Galaxies over the Past 10 Billion Years , 2012, 1208.5143.
[61] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): galaxy environments and star formation rate variations , 2012, 1205.3368.
[62] Y. Mellier,et al. UltraVISTA: a new ultra-deep near-infrared survey in COSMOS , 2012, 1204.6586.
[63] Andrew C. Fabian,et al. Observational Evidence of Active Galactic Nuclei Feedback , 2012 .
[64] Major-merger Galaxy Pairs in the COSMOS Field—Mass-dependent Merger Rate Evolution since z = 1 , 2012 .
[65] Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution. II. The Quenching of Satellite Galaxies as the Origin of Environmental Effects , 2011, 1106.2546.
[66] H. Hoekstra,et al. THE GEMINI CLUSTER ASTROPHYSICS SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY (GCLASS): THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENT AND SELF-REGULATION IN GALAXY EVOLUTION AT z ∼ 1 , 2011, 1112.3655.
[67] C. Conselice,et al. Measures of Galaxy Environment I - What is "Environment"? , 2011, 1109.6328.
[68] Puragra Guhathakurta,et al. The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift , 2011, 1109.5698.
[69] C. Conselice,et al. The relationship between star formation rates, local density and stellar mass up to z ~ 3 in the GOODS NICMOS Survey , 2011, 1108.0402.
[70] H. Hildebrandt,et al. TRACING THE STAR-FORMATION–DENSITY RELATION TO z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1104.1426.
[71] A. Cimatti,et al. The effect of environment on star forming galaxies at redshift I. First insight from PACS , 2011, 1104.1094.
[72] Carnegie,et al. THE STAR-FORMATION-RATE–DENSITY RELATION AT 0.6 < z < 0.9 AND THE ROLE OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2011, 1104.0934.
[73] M. Nonino,et al. EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1.3. III. ON THE DEPENDENCE OF FORMATION EPOCHS AND STAR FORMATION HISTORIES ON STELLAR MASS AND ENVIRONMENT , 2011, 1103.0265.
[74] H. Rix,et al. THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF MASS-SELECTED GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS FIELD , 2010, 1011.6370.
[75] H. Rix,et al. A COSMIC VARIANCE COOKBOOK , 2010, 1001.1737.
[76] I. Smail,et al. The dependence of star formation activity on environment and stellar mass at z∼ 1 from the HiZELS-Hα survey , 2010, 1007.2642.
[77] J. Dunlop,et al. REVERSAL OF FORTUNE: CONFIRMATION OF AN INCREASING STAR FORMATION–DENSITY RELATION IN A CLUSTER AT z = 1.62 , 2010, 1005.5126.
[78] B. Garilli,et al. MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AS DRIVERS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION IN SDSS AND zCOSMOS AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SCHECHTER FUNCTION , 2010, 1003.4747.
[79] Astronomy,et al. COMPARING THE RELATION BETWEEN STAR FORMATION AND GALAXY MASS IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS , 2009, 0912.1180.
[80] V. Wild,et al. Star formation and AGN activity in SDSS cluster galaxies , 2009, 0909.3522.
[81] D. Thompson,et al. Tracking the impact of environment on the galaxy stellar mass function up to z ~ 1 in the 10 k zCOSMOS sample , 2009, 0907.0013.
[82] M. Nonino,et al. FORMATION EPOCHS, STAR FORMATION HISTORIES, AND SIZES OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES IN CLUSTER AND FIELD ENVIRONMENTS AT z = 1.2: INSIGHTS FROM THE REST-FRAME ULTRAVIOLET , 2008, 0806.4604.
[83] H. Rix,et al. MAJOR MERGING: THE WAY TO MAKE A MASSIVE, PASSIVE GALAXY , 2009, 0910.4018.
[84] Leiden,et al. THE DEPENDENCE OF STAR FORMATION RATES ON STELLAR MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AT z ∼ 0.8 , 2009, 0910.0837.
[85] B. Garilli,et al. The zCOSMOS Redshift Survey: How group environment alters global downsizing trends , 2009, 0909.1951.
[86] B. Garilli,et al. zCOSMOS – 10k-bright spectroscopic sample - The bimodality in the galaxy stellar mass function: exploring its evolution with redshift , 2009, 0907.5416.
[87] P. Dokkum,et al. A high stellar velocity dispersion for a compact massive galaxy at redshift z = 2.186 , 2009, Nature.
[88] E. Bell,et al. THE EFFECT OF DRY MERGERS ON THE COLOR–MAGNITUDE RELATION OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES , 2009, 0905.4525.
[89] Oxford,et al. THE GREATER IMPACT OF MERGERS ON THE GROWTH OF MASSIVE GALAXIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR MASS ASSEMBLY AND EVOLUTION SINCE z ≃ 1 , 2009, 0902.1188.
[90] L. Pentericci,et al. The fraction of quiescent massive galaxies in the early Universe , 2009, 0901.2898.
[91] S. Bamford,et al. THE ENVIRONMENTS OF STARBURST AND POST-STARBURST GALAXIES AT z = 0.4–0.8 , 2008, 0811.0252.
[92] O. Fakhouri,et al. Environmental dependence of dark matter halo growth – I. Halo merger rates , 2008, 0808.2471.
[93] D. Thompson,et al. COSMOS PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS WITH 30-BANDS FOR 2-deg2 , 2008, 0809.2101.
[94] H. Ford,et al. Recent Structural Evolution of Early-Type Galaxies: Size Growth from z = 1 to z = 0 , 2008, 0808.0077.
[95] D. Patton,et al. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE LUMINOSITY DEPENDENCE OF THE GALAXY MERGER RATE , 2022 .
[96] H. Mo,et al. The importance of satellite quenching for the build-up of the red sequence of present-day galaxies , 2007, 0710.3164.
[97] S. Bamford,et al. The environmental dependence of the chemical properties of star-forming galaxies , 2007, 0709.3794.
[98] C. Conselice,et al. The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the role of galaxy environment in the cosmic star formation history , 2007, 0706.4089.
[99] A. Cimatti,et al. Multiwavelength Study of Massive Galaxies at z~2. I. Star Formation and Galaxy Growth , 2007, 0705.2831.
[100] D. Schiminovich,et al. The First Release COSMOS Optical and Near-IR Data and Catalog , 2007, 0704.2430.
[101] K. Sheth,et al. The effects of environment on morphological evolution between 0 , 2007, astro-ph/0703668.
[102] K. Sheth,et al. The Effects of Environment on Morphological Evolution at 0 < z < 1.2 in the COSMOS Survey , 2007 .
[103] J. Starck,et al. The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe , 2007, astro-ph/0703653.
[104] An increase in the faint red galaxy population in massive clusters since z \~ 0.5. , 2007, astro-ph/0703484.
[105] L. Guzzo,et al. The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview* , 2006, astro-ph/0612305.
[106] A. Biviano,et al. The AGN fraction-velocity dispersion relation in clusters of galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0610738.
[107] R. Pelló,et al. The build-up of the colour-magnitude relation in galaxy clusters since z ~ 0.8 , 2006, astro-ph/0610373.
[108] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment , 2006, astro-ph/0607648.
[109] D. Kelson,et al. Spectroscopic Confirmation of a Large Population of Active Galactic Nuclei in Clusters of Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602496.
[110] G. Gavazzi,et al. Environmental Effects on Late‐Type Galaxies in Nearby Clusters , 2006, astro-ph/0601108.
[111] UCOLick,et al. Submitted to ApJ Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 THE MASS ASSEMBLY HISTORY OF FIELD GALAXIES: DETECTION OF AN EVOLVING MASS LIMIT FOR STAR FORMING GALAXIES , 2005 .
[112] L. Kewley,et al. Metallicity and Nuclear Star Formation in Nearby Galaxy Pairs: Evidence for Tidally Induced Gas Flows , 2005, astro-ph/0511119.
[113] D. Elson,et al. SPECTROSCOPIC CONFIRMATION OF A LARGE AGN POPULATION IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES , 2006 .
[114] Ž. Ivezić,et al. The host galaxies of radio-loud active galactic nuclei: mass dependences, gas cooling and active galactic nuclei feedback , 2005 .
[115] D. Madgwick,et al. Measuring Galaxy Environments with Deep Redshift Surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0506518.
[116] R. Bouwens,et al. The Morphology-Density Relation in z ~ 1 Clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0501224.
[117] A. Dekel,et al. Galaxy bimodality due to cold flows and shock heating , 2004, astro-ph/0412300.
[118] J. Brinkmann,et al. The environmental dependence of the relations between stellar mass, structure, star formation and nuclear activity in galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0402030.
[119] Christopher J. Miller,et al. Galaxy ecology: groups and low-density environments in the SDSS and 2dFGRS , 2003, astro-ph/0311379.
[120] J. Brinkmann,et al. The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift universe , 2003, astro-ph/0311060.
[121] G. Bruzual,et al. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.
[122] R. Nichol,et al. The Environment of Active Galactic Nuclei in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0307124.
[123] G. Chabrier. Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.
[124] Y. Birnboim,et al. Virial shocks in galactic haloes , 2003, astro-ph/0302161.
[125] J. Navarro,et al. The Origin of Star Formation Gradients in Rich Galaxy Clusters , 2000, astro-ph/0004078.
[126] A. Kinney,et al. The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911459.
[127] Ram pressure stripping of spiral galaxies in clusters , 1999, astro-ph/9903436.
[128] Alan Dressler,et al. A Spectroscopic Catalog of 10 Distant Rich Clusters of Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9901263.
[129] Jr.,et al. STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE , 1998, astro-ph/9807187.
[130] G. Lake,et al. Morphological Transformation from Galaxy Harassment , 1997, astro-ph/9701211.
[131] L. Cowie,et al. New Insight on Galaxy Formation and Evolution from Keck Spectroscopy of the Hawaii Deep Fields , 1996, astro-ph/9606079.
[132] L. Hernquist,et al. Gasdynamics and starbursts in major mergers , 1995, astro-ph/9512099.
[133] J. Gunn,et al. The Morphology of Distant Cluster Galaxies. I. HST Observations of CL 0939+4713 , 1994 .
[134] R. Ellis,et al. Evidence for systematic evolution in the properties of galaxies in distant clusters , 1993 .
[135] W. Couch,et al. A spectroscopic study of three rich galaxy clusters at z = 0.31 , 1987 .
[136] James E. Gunn,et al. Spectroscopy of galaxies in distant clusters. II: The population of the 3C 295 cluster , 1983 .
[137] D. Merritt,et al. Relaxation and tidal stripping in rich clusters of galaxies. II. Evolution of the luminosity distribution. , 1983 .
[138] P. Nulsen. Transport processes and the stripping of cluster galaxies. , 1982 .
[139] Rida T. Farouki,et al. Computer simulations of environmental influences on galaxy evolution in dense clusters. II. rapid tidal encounters , 1981 .
[140] B. Tinsley,et al. The evolution of disk galaxies and the origin of S0 galaxies , 1980 .
[141] A. Oemler,et al. Evolution of galaxies in clusters. I. ISIT photometry of Cl 0024 + 1654 and 3C 295 , 1978 .
[142] L. Cowie,et al. Thermal evaporation of gas within galaxies by a hot intergalactic medium , 1977, Nature.
[143] J. Gunn,et al. On the Infall of Matter into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution , 1972 .