A finite element stratification method for a polyurethane jounce bumper

The primary problem in the finite element analysis of polyurethane jounce bumpers, bumper stops, or similar structures is the identification of a mathematical model for the constitutive material. The densities of the exterior polyurethane area and the interior polyurethane area usually differ owing to the manufacturing process. This difference results in inaccuracy when predicting the mechanical behavior of the jounce bumper and bumper stop if a homogeneous material model is used. Thus, this work proposes a stratification method for finite element analysis of a polyurethane jounce bumper. The polyurethane structure was divided into three regions (the ‘skin layer’, the ‘transition layer’, and the ‘core area’) with different material properties. A foam model was utilized as the constitutive relationship. The foam model coefficients of the core area were obtained by a curve-fitting process using uniaxial compression test results. Subsequently, the material properties of the skin layer and the transition layer were also obtained. The finite element analysis results show that the proposed stratification strategy improves the prediction of the deformed shapes of the polyurethane jounce bumper. Furthermore, the calculated load–displacement curve is reliable for small to medium strains (0–0.4). Therefore, the proposed stratification method can be applied to enhance the reliability of jounce bumper simulations and to simplify the design process.

[1]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  Effect of the suspension structure on equivalent suspension parameters , 1999 .

[2]  Ivonne Sgura,et al.  Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data , 2004 .

[3]  Y. Samim Ünlüsoy,et al.  Product Based Material Testing for Hyperelastic Suspension Jounce Bumper Design with FEA , 2010 .

[4]  R. Ogden,et al.  Large deformation isotropic elasticity: on the correlation of theory and experiment for compressible rubberlike solids , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  Aidy Ali,et al.  Durability of automotive jounce bumper , 2011 .

[6]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  Uncertainty modelling of a suspension unit , 2005 .

[7]  Atef F. Saleeb,et al.  Nonlinear material parameter estimation for characterizing hyper elastic large strain models , 2000 .

[8]  Daniel G. Dickson,et al.  Microcellular Polyurethane Jounce Bumper Design and the Effects on Durability , 2005 .

[9]  E. H. Twizell,et al.  Non-linear optimization of the material constants in Ogden's stress-deformation function for incompressinle isotropic elastic materials , 1983, The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics.

[10]  NJ Mills,et al.  Polymer Foams Handbook: Engineering and Biomechanics Applications and Design Guide , 2007 .

[11]  Wanzhong Zhao,et al.  Integrated optimisation of active steering and semi-active suspension based on an improved Memetic algorithm , 2015 .

[12]  Wanzhong Zhao,et al.  Research on the multi-disciplinary design method for an integrated automotive steering and suspension system , 2015 .

[13]  Nj Mills Chapter 6 – Finite element modelling of foam deformation , 2007 .

[14]  Daniel G. Dickson A Primer on Jounce Bumper Design Using Microcellular Polyurethane , 2004 .

[15]  Aidy Ali,et al.  Experimental Determination of Fatigue Life of Automotive Jounce Bumper , 2011 .

[16]  Roberto J. J. Williams,et al.  Integral‐skin polyurethane foams , 1986 .

[17]  V. K. Gupta,et al.  Formation of integral skin polyurethane foams , 1999 .

[18]  Aidy Ali,et al.  Fatigue life of automotive rubber jounce bumper , 2010 .

[19]  Aidy Ali,et al.  Fatigue Characteristics of Automotive Jounce Bumper , 2011 .

[20]  Sh Azadi,et al.  Non-linear dynamic analysis of automotive suspension system incorporating rubber bump stops , 2011 .