Investigating Improvements to Pedestrian Crossings with an Emphasis on the Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon

The goal of this research effort was to improve pedestrian safety at urban and suburban crossing locations by identifying and evaluating low- to medium-cost pedestrian treatments. The treatments were to have the potential to reduce pedestrian crashes at both midblock and intersection locations. While several treatments were considered during early efforts of this project, later tasks focused on the rectangular rapid-flashing beacon (RRFB). The RRFB has received extensive national attention because of high yielding rates observed at multiple installations, and several studies have found increased driver yielding after installing this device. The key research effort for this study included a closed-course study and an open-road study. The objectives of the closed-course study were as follows: (1) Determine whether the shape, size, and placement of flashing beacons/light-emitting diodes (LEDs) affect sign legibility distances and object detection. (2) Determine driver ratings of disability glare for 8-inch circular beacons and LED-embedded signs using a rapid flash pattern. (3) Identify up to two assemblies for field evaluation to be conducted following the conclusion of the closed-course tasks. The objectives of the open-road study were as follows: (1) Determine whether drivers yielded differently to circular or rectangular beacons when used with a rapid-flashing pattern. (2) Determine to what extent, if any, a driver is more likely to yield to a pedestrian when the rapid-flashing beacon is activated than when it is not activated. (3) Determine whether vehicle traffic volume affects driver yielding.

[1]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[2]  P R Boyce,et al.  EVALUATION OF IN-PAVEMENT, FLASHING WARNING LIGHTS ON PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SAFETY , 2003 .

[3]  Donald W. Kline,et al.  SYMBOL SIGNING DESIGN FOR OLDER DRIVERS , 1997 .

[4]  T. Schnell,et al.  Traffic Sign Luminance Requirements of Nighttime Drivers for Symbolic Signs , 2004 .

[5]  L. McCloskey,et al.  Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians. , 2002, JAMA.

[6]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Modern traffic control devices to improve safety at rural intersections. , 2011 .

[7]  June Ross,et al.  Assessment of Driver Yielding Rates Pre- and Post-RRFB Installation, Bend, Oregon , 2011 .

[8]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Advance Yield Markings: Reducing Motor Vehicle—Pedestrian Conflicts at Multilane Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approach , 2001 .

[9]  J Domarad,et al.  Improving Crosswalk Safety: Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB) Trial in Calgary , 2013 .

[10]  Madaniyo Mutabazi Sight obstruction at at-grade pedestrian crossings: A review of the understanding of the meaning of zigzag lines , 2010 .

[11]  D Evans THE LIGHT OF YOUR LIFE: IN-PAVEMENT LEDS STOP CARS AND SAVE LIVES , 1999 .

[12]  Srinivas Subrahmanyam Pulugurtha,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an In-pavement Flashing Light System , 2006 .

[13]  Lance E Dougald,et al.  Safer Midblock Environments for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossings , 2012 .

[14]  Sherrill Swan,et al.  TREATMENTS OF OVERPASSES AND UNDERCROSSING FOR THE DISABLED: EARLY REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE ART. ABRIDGMENT , 1978 .

[15]  Mark Feldman,et al.  Empirical Bayesian Evaluation of Safety Effects of High-Visibility School (Yellow) Crosswalks in San Francisco, California , 2010 .

[16]  M J Cynecki,et al.  A REVIEW OF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RESEARCH IN THE UNITED STATES AND ABROAD , 2004 .

[17]  Jeffrey F Paniati Legibility and Comprehension of Traffic Sign Symbols , 1988 .

[18]  Reid Ewing,et al.  The Relative Effectiveness of Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures at Urban Intersections: Lessons from a New York City Experience , 2012 .

[19]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment , 2010 .

[20]  Katharine Hunter-Zaworski,et al.  Evaluation of Alternative Pedestrian Traffic Control Devices , 2012 .

[21]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Crosswalk Marking Field Visibility Study , 2010 .

[22]  D. Schrank,et al.  2012 Urban Mobility Report , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  Effect of Luminance and Text Size on Information Acquisition Time from Traffic Signs , 2009 .

[24]  Marcus A Brewer,et al.  Characteristics of Texas Pedestrian Crashes and Evaluation of Driver Yielding at Pedestrian Treatments , 2014 .

[25]  J W Van Winkle,et al.  PEDESTRIAN-ACTUATED CROSSWALK FLASHERS , 2000 .

[26]  R Bacquie,et al.  PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND SAFETY AUDIT , 2001 .

[27]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Effects of Yellow Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks , 2010 .

[28]  M S Janoff,et al.  FIXED ILLUMINATION FOR PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION , 1975 .

[29]  Kelley Klaver Pecheux,et al.  Guidebook for Mitigating Fixed-Route Bus-and-Pedestrian Collisions , 2008 .

[30]  B. F. Herms PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK STUDY: ACCIDENTS IN PAINTED AND UNPAINTED CROSSWALKS , 1972 .

[31]  L Malenfant,et al.  The influence of signs prompting motorists to yield before marked crosswalks on motor vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at crosswalks with flashing amber. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Christopher Strong,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Yield-To-Pedestrian Channelizing Devices: Final Report , 2006 .

[33]  J. Tebbs,et al.  An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis , 2008 .

[34]  J. Stewart,et al.  Safety effects of marked vs unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: executive summary and recommended guidelines , 2002 .

[35]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  A Comparison of Gateway In-Street Sign Treatment to Other Driver Prompts to Increase Yielding to Pedestrians at Crosswalks , 2014 .

[36]  Michael J. Cynecki,et al.  PEDESTRIAN WARNING FLASHERS IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: DO THEY HELP? , 1990 .

[37]  Victoria Gitelman,et al.  An evaluation of crosswalk warning systems: effects on pedestrian and vehicle behaviour , 2002 .

[38]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of the Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon at a Pinellas Trail Crossing in St. Petersburg, Florida: Final Report, October 2009 , 2009 .

[39]  Vinod Vasudevan,et al.  Evaluation of Effectiveness of Traffic Signs to Enhance Pedestrian Safety , 2010 .

[40]  R L Knoblauch,et al.  Pedestrian crosswalk case studies : Sacramento, California; Richmond, Virginia; Buffalo, New York; Stillwater, Minnesota , 2001 .

[41]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .

[42]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[43]  John Fox,et al.  Robust Regression in R An Appendix to An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition , 2011 .

[44]  Robert E. Dewar,et al.  Human factors in traffic safety , 2002 .

[45]  Panos D. Prevedouros EVALUATION OF IN-PAVEMENT FLASHING LIGHTS ON A SIX-LANE ARTERIAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING , 2001 .

[46]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  Legibility of Traffic Sign Text and Symbols , 1999 .

[47]  A. Genz,et al.  Computation of Multivariate Normal and t Probabilities , 2009 .

[48]  Brian L Bowman,et al.  EFFECT OF URBAN AND SUBURBAN MEDIAN TYPES ON BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY , 1994 .

[49]  R. Houten,et al.  The effects of advance stop lines and sign prompts on pedestrian safety in a crosswalk on a multilane highway. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[50]  Charles V. Zegeer,et al.  Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities , 2001 .

[51]  Marcus A Brewer,et al.  Driver Yielding at Traffic Control Signals, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons, and Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons in Texas , 2014 .

[52]  W Jansen,et al.  IN-PAVEMENT PEDESTRIAN FLASHER EVALUATION: CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA , 2004 .

[53]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Advance Yield Markings and Fluorescent Yellow-Green RA 4 Signs at Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approaches , 2002 .

[54]  Charles Zegeer,et al.  Effects of Innovative Pedestrian Signs at Unsignalized Locations: Three Treatments , 2000 .

[55]  Robert E. Dewar,et al.  Human Factors in Traffic Safety, Second Edition , 2007 .

[56]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Improving pedestrian safety at unsignalized crossings , 2007 .

[57]  Brian L Bowman,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT PRACTICE IN SELECTION AND DESIGN OF URBAN MEDIANS TO BENEFIT PEDESTRIANS , 1994 .

[58]  M. Townes TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops , 2000 .

[59]  Abishai Polus,et al.  An analysis of nighttime pedestrian accidents at specially illuminated crosswalks , 1978 .

[60]  Dan Nabors,et al.  Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies , 2008 .

[61]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic Control Devices, Year 3 , 2011 .

[62]  A. Gibby,et al.  EVALUATION OF MARKED AND UNMARKED CROSSWALKS AT INTERSECTIONS IN CALIFORNIA. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[63]  Charles Zegeer,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility in Europe , 2013 .

[64]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Reduction of Pedestrian Fatalities, Injuries, Conflicts, and Other Surrogate Measures in Miami–Dade, Florida , 2009 .

[66]  B. Pegrum THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES AND THEIR EFFECT ON ROAD SAFETY , 1972 .

[67]  J Templer DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITY ACCESSIBLE NETWORKS-AN IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL. PROVISIONS FOR THE ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED PEDESTRIANS , 1980 .

[68]  J R Tobin STANDARDS & GUIDELINES FOR MID-BLOCK CROSSINGS: LAS VEGAS STUDY , 1999 .

[69]  Shashi S Nambisan,et al.  Effectiveness of Automatic Pedestrian Detection Device and Smart Lighting for Pedestrian Safety , 2009 .