Challenges and strategies of the Genetics Home Reference.

OBJECTIVE This paper focuses on the first two years of operation of Genetics Home Reference (GHR), a Web-based resource for the general public that helps to explain the health implications of findings from the Human Genome Project. METHODS AND FINDINGS Key challenges of Web-based consumer health communication encountered in the growth and maintenance of GHR are discussed: prioritizing topics for GHR, streamlining the development process while keeping genetic information accurate, and designing a system that helps consumers navigate complex genetic relationships. Various strategies are used to address these challenges. Tying content development to topics of national priority and addressing topics requested by users makes the site increasingly important for both consumers and health professionals. Informatics methods are essential for quality control, particularly for genetic information that changes frequently. Indexing and hierarchical browsing features help to facilitate navigation. CONCLUSIONS GHR is a credible, dynamic Website that uses lay language to explain the effects of genetic variation on human health. Informatics strategies are key to effective management of a large and expanding body of genetics information. Feedback from formal and informal sources indicates increasing usage and favorable acceptance of GHR.

[1]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[2]  Valerie Vickerman Runes.  The department. , 2003, Midwifery today with international midwife.

[3]  Tsviya Olender,et al.  GeneCardsTM 2002: towards a complete, object-oriented, human gene compendium , 2002, Bioinform..

[4]  Jay M Bernhardt,et al.  Perceived Barriers to Internet-Based Health Communication on Human Genetics , 2002, Journal of health communication.

[5]  A. Guttmacher.  Human genetics on the web. , 2001, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[6]  A T McCray,et al.  From Phenotype to Genotype: Issues in Navigating the Available Information Resources , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Genomic medicine--a primer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Alan R. Aronson,et al.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program , 2001, AMIA.

[10]  Robert A. Logan,et al.  Evaluating Consumer Informatics: Learning from Health Campaign Research , 2004, MedInfo.

[11]  C E Lipscomb,et al.  Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[12]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Allen C. Browne,et al.  UMLS language and vocabulary tools. , 2003, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[14]  Thomas C. Rindflesch,et al.  EDGAR: extraction of drugs, genes and relations from the biomedical literature. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[15]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Genetics and genomics in practice: The continuum from genetic disease to genetic information in health and disease , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  Michael S. Watson,et al.  Newborn Screening: Toward a Uniform Screening Panel and System—Executive Summary , 2006, Pediatrics.

[17]  Betsy L. Humphreys,et al.  Technical Milestone: The Unified Medical Language System: An Informatics Research Collaboration , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Halil Kilicoglu,et al.  Abstraction Summarization for Managing the Biomedical Research Literature , 2004, HLT-NAACL 2004.

[19]  Alexa T. McCray,et al.  Terminology issues in user access to Web-based medical information , 1999, AMIA.

[20]  A T McCray,et al.  Biomedical ontologies. , 2005, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[21]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information , 2004, MedInfo.

[22]  B Marshall,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Alexa T. McCray,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Design of Genetics Home Reference: A New NLM Consumer Health Resource , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  A. Alman,et al.  Use of the Internet by patients and their families to obtain genetics-related information. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[25]  Tatiana A. Tatusova,et al.  Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Internet Health Resources , 2003 .

[27]  Gene Ontology Consortium.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2003 .

[28]  J E Backus,et al.  MEDLINEplus: building and maintaining the National Library of Medicine's consumer health Web service. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[29]  Patricia K. Baskin,et al.  GeneTests‐GeneClinics: Genetic testing information for a growing audience , 2002, Human mutation.

[30]  Mathew W. Wright,et al.  The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) , 2001, Human Genetics.

[31]  F. Collins,et al.  Welcome to the genomic era. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Alexa T. McCray,et al.  Application of Technology: Design and Implementation of a National Clinical Trials Registry , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..