Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance

The design of high-resolution retinal prostheses presents many unique engineering and biological challenges. Ever smaller electrodes must inject enough charge to stimulate nerve cells, within electrochemically safe voltage limits. Stimulation sites should be placed within an electrode diameter from the target cells to prevent 'blurring' and minimize current. Signals must be delivered wirelessly from an external source to a large number of electrodes, and visual information should, ideally, maintain its natural link to eye movements. Finally, a good system must have a wide range of stimulation currents, external control of image processing and the option of either anodic-first or cathodic-first pulses. This paper discusses these challenges and presents solutions to them for a system based on a photodiode array implant. Video frames are processed and imaged onto the retinal implant by a head-mounted near-to-eye projection system operating at near-infrared wavelengths. Photodiodes convert light into pulsed electric current, with charge injection maximized by applying a common biphasic bias waveform. The resulting prosthesis will provide stimulation with a frame rate of up to 50 Hz in a central 10 degrees visual field, with a full 30 degrees field accessible via eye movements. Pixel sizes are scalable from 100 to 25 microm, corresponding to 640-10,000 pixels on an implant 3 mm in diameter.

[1]  J E Morgan,et al.  Histological measurement of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness , 2005, Eye.

[2]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  W. Liu Intraocular retinal prosthesis: microelectronics meets medicine , 2001, Digest of Papers. Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2001. 2001 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.01EX468).

[4]  Rolf Eckmiller,et al.  Exploration of a dialog-based tunable retina encoder for retina implants , 1999, Neurocomputing.

[5]  J. Flannery,et al.  Degenerative changes in a retina affected with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  D. Atchison,et al.  The eye and visual optical instruments: Frontmatter , 1997 .

[7]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling during retinal degeneration. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[8]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  John M. Osepchuk,et al.  Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation , 1983 .

[10]  E Zrenner,et al.  [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview]. , 2005, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[11]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Franz Fankhauser,et al.  Adjustment of guidelines for exposure of the eye to optical radiation from ocular instruments: statement from a task group of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). , 2005, Applied optics.

[13]  Stuart F Cogan,et al.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Migration of retinal cells through a perforated membrane: implications for a high-resolution prosthesis. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  G. Ziegelberger,et al.  International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. , 2006, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[16]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Attracting retinal cells to electrodes for high-resolution stimulation , 2004, SPIE BiOS.

[17]  Philip R. Troyk,et al.  In vitro comparison of the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) and platinum-iridium microelectrodes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis. Big steps to sight restoration. , 2006, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[21]  B. Rappaz,et al.  Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  Daniel V. Palanker,et al.  Dynamic range of safe electrical stimulation of the retina , 2006, SPIE BiOS.

[23]  David A. Atchison,et al.  The eye and visual optical instruments: The eye , 1997 .

[24]  Yael Henkin,et al.  Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant. , 2003, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

[25]  Paul J DeMarco,et al.  Stimulation via a subretinally placed prosthetic elicits central activity and induces a trophic effect on visual responses. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the nervous system: The principle of safe charge injection with noble metal electrodes , 1975 .

[27]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[28]  Thomas Schanze,et al.  Implantation of retina stimulation electrodes and recording of electrical stimulation responses in the visual cortex of the cat , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[29]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  Philip R. Troyk,et al.  Potential-biased, asymmetric waveforms for charge-injection with activated iridium oxide (AIROF) neural stimulation electrodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinal prosthesis for the blind. , 2002, Survey of ophthalmology.

[32]  Wentai Liu,et al.  Design and analysis of an adaptive transcutaneous power telemetry for biomedical implants , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[33]  Ralf Brinkmann,et al.  Noninvasive optoacoustic temperature determination at the fundus of the eye during laser irradiation. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[34]  Thomas Laube,et al.  A method and technical equipment for an acute human trial to evaluate retinal implant technology , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  Thomas W. Raasch,et al.  The Eye and Visual Optical Instruments , 1998 .

[36]  Daniel Palanker High Resolution Optoelectronic Retinal Prosthesis , 2007 .

[37]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[38]  F. Gekeler,et al.  Stand des subretinalen Implantatprojekts , 2005, Der Ophthalmologe.

[39]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: AMethod for Determination of "Real" Electrode Areas , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  T. Velte,et al.  A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  Srinivas R. Sadda,et al.  Electrical stimulation in normal and retinal degeneration (rd1) isolated mouse retina , 2006, Vision Research.

[42]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[43]  J M Marston,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. V. The effect of protein on Pt dissolution. , 1980, Biomaterials.