Using confidence intervals to estimate the response of salmon populations (Oncorhynchus spp.) to experimental habitat alterations

There is considerable uncertainty about the effectiveness of fish habitat restoration programs, and reliable monitoring programs are needed to evaluate them. Statistical power analysis based on traditional hypothesis tests are usually used for monitoring program design, but here we argue that effect size estimates and their associated confidence intervals are more informative because results can be compared with both the null hypothesis of no effect and effect sizes of interest, such as restoration goals. We used a stochastic simulation model to compare alternative monitoring strategies for a habitat alteration that would change the productivity and capacity of a coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) producing stream. Estimates of the effect size using a freshwater stock–recruit model were more precise than those from monitoring the abundance of either spawners or smolts. Less than ideal monitoring programs can produce ambiguous results, which are cases in which the confidence interval includes both the null...

[1]  M. Bradford,et al.  Reference points for coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) harvest rates and escapement goals based on freshwater production , 2000 .

[2]  J. Korman,et al.  Utility of escapement time series data for monitoring the response of salmon populations to habitat alteration , 1997 .

[3]  John G. Williams.  Stock Dynamics and Adaptive Management of Habitat: An Evaluation Based on Simulations , 1999 .

[4]  G. McBride,et al.  What do significance tests really tell us about the environment? , 1993 .

[5]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[6]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Uncertainty and instream flow standards , 1996 .

[7]  B. Mapstone.  Scalable Decision Rules for Environmental Impact Studies: Effect Size, Type I, and Type II Errors , 1995 .

[8]  M. Bradford.  Comparative review of Pacific salmon survival rates , 1995 .

[9]  G. Pess,et al.  A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .

[10]  Neville Nicholls,et al.  commentary and analysis: The Insignificance of Significance Testing , 2001 .

[11]  A H Smith,et al.  Confidence limit analyses should replace power calculations in the interpretation of epidemiologic studies. , 1992, Epidemiology.

[12]  D. Scarnecchia,et al.  Emigration of age-0 chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts from the upper South Umpqua River basin, Oregon, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[13]  C. Coronado,et al.  Spatial and temporal factors affecting survival in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Pacific Northwest , 1998 .

[14]  M. Clark,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management , 2002 .

[15]  Allan Stewart-Oaten,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: "PSEUDOREPLICATION" IN TIME?' , 1986 .

[16]  R. A. Hinrichsen.  High variability in spawnerrecruit data hampers learning , 2001 .

[17]  M. L. Murphy,et al.  Determination of Salmonid Smolt Yield with Rotary‐Screw Traps in the Situk River, Alaska, to Predict Effects of Glacial Flooding , 1994 .

[18]  High variability in spawner-recruit data hampers learning , 2001 .

[19]  M. Bradford.  Trends in the Abundance of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) of the Nechako River, British Columbia , 1994 .

[20]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Adaptive Inference for Distinguishing Credible from Incredible Patterns in Nature , 2002, Ecosystems.

[21]  A Decision Analysis Framework for Comparing Experimental Designs of Projects to Enhance Pacific Salmon , 2002 .

[22]  James R. Bence,et al.  Analysis of Short Time Series: Correcting for Autocorrelation , 1995 .

[23]  H. Iyer,et al.  Detecting cumulative watershed effects: the statistical power of pairing , 2001 .

[24]  Samu Mäntyniemi,et al.  Bayesian mark-recapture estimation with an application to a salmonid smolt population , 2002 .

[25]  Douglas H. Johnson.  The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing , 1999 .

[26]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Learning as an objective within a structured risk management decision process. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  C. Walters,et al.  Linking recruitment to trophic factors: revisiting the Beverton--Holt recruitment model from a life history and multispecies perspective , 1999, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[28]  T. Pearsons,et al.  Can reduced salmonid population abundance be detected in time to limit management impacts , 2000 .

[29]  Effects of observer efficiency, arrival timing, and survey life on estimates of escapement for steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) derived from repeat mark-recapture experiments , 2002 .

[30]  M. Bradford,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Trends in the Abundance of Coho Salmon Smolts from Western North America , 1999 .

[31]  Detecting juvenile survival effects of habitat actions: power analysis applied to endangered Snake River spring-summer chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) , 2003 .

[32]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[33]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Valuation of experimental management options for ecological systems , 1997 .

[34]  Michael J Keough,et al.  The Variability of Estimates of Variance, and Its Effect on Power Analysis in Monitoring Design , 2002, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[35]  Robert J. Steidl,et al.  Statistical power analysis in wildlife research , 1997 .