Using Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Test for a Continuum Structure of Motivation

This paper explores the nature of workplace motivation by testing the continuum structure of motivation proposed by self-determination theory through the application of relatively new and advanced methodological techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate the usefulness of the overarching bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework in organizational psychology and discuss implications of such models over more traditional confirmatory factor analyses. This framework is applied to responses obtained from 1,124 Canadian employees who completed a multidimensional measure of workplace motivation. The results support a continuum of self-regulation and illustrate the importance of accounting for quality of motivation in addition to its global quantity. Indeed, the results showed that specific types of motivation explained variance in covariates over and above the variance already explained by the global quantity of self-determination. The current study further demonstrates the limitation of the commonly used relative autonomy index and offers alternate conceptualizations of human motivation.

[1]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions , 2013 .

[2]  Hans De Witte,et al.  Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale , 2010 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel A. Sass,et al.  Rotation Criteria and Hypothesis Testing for Exploratory Factor Analysis: Implications for Factor Pattern Loadings and Interfactor Correlations , 2011 .

[5]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education , 1992 .

[6]  Understanding exercise motivation: Examining the revised social-cognitive model of achievement motivation. , 2008 .

[7]  Caroline Aubé,et al.  The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation Evidence in Two Languages , 2010 .

[8]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Methodological Measurement Fruitfulness of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM): New Approaches to Key Substantive Issues in Motivation and Engagement , 2011 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[10]  K. Holzinger,et al.  The Bi-factor method , 1937 .

[11]  Gilles E. Gignac.  The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better , 2016 .

[12]  H. Caci,et al.  Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire , 2015, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[13]  C. Vandenberghe,et al.  Perceived sacrifice and few alternatives commitments: The motivational underpinnings of continuance commitment's subdimensions , 2012 .

[14]  Tyler M. Moore,et al.  Target Rotations and Assessing the Impact of Model Violations on the Parameters of Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models , 2011 .

[15]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[16]  Emanuela Chemolli,et al.  Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. , 2014, Psychological assessment.

[17]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[18]  M. Browne.  An Overview of Analytic Rotation in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating Cfa and Efa: Application to Students' Evaluations of University Teaching , 2022 .

[20]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries , 2015 .

[21]  Studies in the learning function , 1937 .

[22]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  C. Vandenberghe,et al.  Mindsets of Commitment and Motivation: Interrelationships and Contribution to Work Outcomes , 2013, The Journal of psychology.

[25]  U. Trautwein,et al.  The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model Revisited: Incorporating General Cognitive Ability and General Academic Self-Concept , 2008, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989 .

[27]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling With Cross-Loadings and Residual Covariances , 2015 .

[28]  Emanuela Chemolli,et al.  A Temporal Analysis of the Relation between Organisational Commitment and Work Motivation , 2008 .

[29]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[30]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[31]  F. Guay,et al.  Achievement : Mediating and Additive Effects , 2017 .

[32]  H. Marsh,et al.  Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right--camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[33]  B. Muthén,et al.  Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling , 2009 .

[34]  P. Harmer,et al.  Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Sport Motivation Scale: a structural equation modeling analysis. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[35]  A. Cox,et al.  Social physique anxiety in physical education: Social contextual factors and links to motivation and behavior , 2011 .

[36]  L. Pelletier,et al.  Pressure From Above and Pressure From Below as Determinants of Teachers ’ Motivation and Teaching Behaviors , 2002 .

[37]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. , 2010, Psychological assessment.

[38]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[39]  Michael Eid,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions , 2000 .

[40]  E. Deci,et al.  “Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains”: Correction to Deci and Ryan (2008). , 2008 .

[41]  M. Blais,et al.  Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) , 1995 .

[42]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  F. Chen.  Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[44]  D. Ingledew,et al.  The relationships between body mass and body image and relative autonomy for exercise among adolescent males and females , 2007 .

[45]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  Frédéric Guay,et al.  Motivation for PhD studies : scale development and validation , 2015 .

[47]  A. Morin,et al.  Cross-validation of the short form of the physical self-inventory (PSI-S) using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) , 2011 .

[48]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  When does quality of relationships with coworkers predict burnout over time? The moderating role of work motivation , 2010 .

[49]  Pierre Valois,et al.  Application of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Evaluate the Academic Motivation Scale , 2015 .

[50]  H. Marsh,et al.  Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. , 2007 .

[51]  David Thissen,et al.  On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model , 1999 .

[52]  C. Vandenberghe,et al.  Extension of the three-component model of commitment to five foci - Development of measures and substantive test , 2002 .

[53]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II) , 2013 .

[54]  Daniel F. Gucciardi,et al.  Exploratory structural equation modelling and Bayesian estimation , 2016 .

[55]  R. Ryan,et al.  Autonomy in children's learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Frederick L. Oswald,et al.  Bifactor Models of Personality and College Student Performance: A Broad versus Narrow View , 2014 .

[57]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis , 2011, Psychometrika.

[58]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian SEM : A more flexible representation of substantive theory , 2010 .

[59]  S. Reise.  The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models , 2012 .

[60]  Gilles E. Gignac.  Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models: g as superordinate or breadth factor? , 2008 .

[61]  Daniel A Sass,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Multivariate Behavioral Research a Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria within Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2022 .

[62]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[63]  J. Kahn.  Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice , 2006 .

[64]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[65]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  On the Assessment of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education: Evidence on the Concurrent and Construct Validity of the Academic Motivation Scale , 1993 .

[66]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework for the Identification of Distinct Sources of Construct-Relevant Psychometric Multidimensionality , 2016 .

[67]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  An Introduction to Intermediate and Advanced Statistical Analyses for Sport and Exercise Scientists , 2015 .

[68]  R. Vallerand.  Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[69]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Repairing Tom Swift's Electric Factor Analysis Machine , 2003 .

[70]  Aja Louise Murray,et al.  The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure , 2013 .

[71]  S. Wininger.  Self-Determination Theory and Exercise Behavior: An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Motivation Scale , 2007 .

[72]  H. Caci,et al.  Exploring sources of construct‐relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement: A tutorial and illustration using the Composite Scale of Morningness , 2016, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[73]  Fuzhong Li,et al.  The exercise motivation scale : its multifaceted structure and construct validity (physical activity) , 1999 .

[74]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  Local Influence and Robust Procedures for Mediation Analysis , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[75]  Herbert W Marsh,et al.  Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. , 2014, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[76]  Peter Newcombe,et al.  Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale , 2007 .

[77]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .