Both DNA and Histone Fold Sequences Contribute to Archaeal Nucleosome Stability*

The roles and interdependence of DNA sequence and archaeal histone fold structure in determining archaeal nucleosome stability and positioning have been determined and quantitated. The presence of four tandem copies of TTTAAAGCCG in the polylinker region of pLITMUS28 resulted in a DNA molecule with increased affinity (ΔΔG of ∼700 cal mol−1) for the archaeal histone HMfB relative to the polylinker sequence, and the dominant, quantitative contribution of the helical repeats of the dinucleotide TA to this increased affinity has been established. The rotational and translational positioning of archaeal nucleosomes assembled on the (TTTAAAGCCG)4 sequence and on DNA molecules selectively incorporated into archaeal nucleosomes by HMfB have been determined. Alternating A/T- and G/C-rich regions were located where the minor and major grooves, respectively, sequentially faced the archaeal nucleosome core, and identical positioning results were obtained using HMfA, a closely related archaeal histone also fromMethanothermus fervidus. However, HMfA did not have similarly high affinities for the HMfB-selected DNA molecules, and domain-swap experiments have shown that this difference in affinity is determined by residue differences in the C-terminal region of α-helix 3 of the histone fold, a region that is not expected to directly interact with DNA. Rather this region is thought to participate in forming the histone dimer:dimer interface at the center of an archaeal nucleosome histone tetramer core. If differences in this interface do result in archaeal histone cores with different sequence preferences, then the assembly of alternative archaeal nucleosome tetramer cores could provide an unanticipated and novel structural mechanism to regulate gene expression.

[1]  H. Blöcker,et al.  Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Karolin Luger,et al.  Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[3]  D. Crothers,et al.  Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Reeve,et al.  DNA binding by the archaeal histone HMf results in positive supercoiling. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Widom Structure, dynamics, and function of chromatin in vitro. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  J. Reeve,et al.  Archaeal Histones, Nucleosomes, and Transcription Initiation , 1997, Cell.

[7]  K. Decanniere,et al.  Crystal structures of recombinant histones HMfA and HMfB from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Mikael Kubista,et al.  Nucleosome Structural Features and Intrinsic Properties of the TATAAACGCC Repeat Sequence* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  B. Révet,et al.  Interaction of the histone (H3-H4)2 tetramer of the nucleosome with positively supercoiled DNA minicircles: Potential flipping of the protein from a left- to a right-handed superhelical form. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Shimizu,et al.  Characterization of the binding of HU and IHF, homologous histone-like proteins of Escherichia coli, to curved and uncurved DNA. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  J. Widom,et al.  New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Reeve,et al.  Thermodynamic stability of archaeal histones. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[13]  J. Svaren,et al.  Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes. , 1996, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[14]  Christopher A. Hunter,et al.  Sequence-dependent DNA structure: tetranucleotide conformational maps. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Widom,et al.  Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  J. Widom,et al.  Archaeal histone selection of nucleosome positioning sequences and the procaryotic origin of histone-dependent genome evolution. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  John N. Anderson,et al.  Unique translational positioning of nucleosomes on synthetic DNAs. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  D M Crothers,et al.  Identification and characterization of genomic nucleosome-positioning sequences. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  D M Crothers,et al.  Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Reeve,et al.  [10] Archaeal histones and nucleosomes , 2001 .

[21]  D. Fitzgerald,et al.  DNA distortion as a factor in nucleosome positioning. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. Reeve,et al.  Archaeal nucleosome positioning sequence from Methanothermus fervidus. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Reeve,et al.  Structure and functional relationships of archaeal and eukaryal histones and nucleosomes , 2000, Archives of Microbiology.

[24]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[26]  J. Reeve,et al.  Mutational analysis of archaeal histone-DNA interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  J M Gottesfeld,et al.  Energetics and affinity of the histone octamer for defined DNA sequences. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[28]  H. Drew,et al.  Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  T. Richmond,et al.  DNA binding within the nucleosome core. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  J. Reeve,et al.  Histone stoichiometry and DNA circularization in archaeal nucleosomes. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  J. Reeve,et al.  MJ1647, an open reading frame in the genome of the hyperthermophile Methanococcus jannaschii, encodes a very thermostable archaeal histone with a C-terminal extension , 2000, Extremophiles.

[32]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[33]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Histone contributions to the structure of DNA in the nucleosome. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  T. Tullius,et al.  The unusual conformation adopted by the adenine tracts in kinetoplast DNA , 1987, Cell.

[35]  J. Griffith,et al.  HMf, a histone-related protein from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, binds preferentially to DNA containing phased tracts of adenines , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  C. Romier,et al.  The histone fold is a key structural motif of transcription factor TFIID. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  H. Richard-Foy,et al.  The Switch in the Helical Handedness of the Histone (H3-H4)2 Tetramer within a Nucleoprotein Particle Requires a Reorientation of the H3-H3 Interface* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  D. Timm,et al.  Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution. , 2000, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[39]  J. Reeve,et al.  Growth-phase-dependent synthesis of histones in the archaeon Methanothermus fervidus. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  D. Crothers,et al.  Global structure and mechanical properties of a 10-bp nucleosome positioning motif. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.