Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children

Deficient sustained attention is a symptom of hyperactivity that can be improved by stimulant medication. Recently, amphetamine has been shown to increase detections during a vigilance task in both normal and hyperactive boys. The present study applied signal detection analysis to the vigilance performance of 15 hyperactive and 14 normal boys divided into two age groups (6–9 and 10–12). A computerized continuous performance test was administered under amphetamine and placebo. Overall group comparisons indicated that perceptual sensitivity or d′ was higher for the normal boys and the older groups, and analysis of drug treatments showed that amphetamine significantly increased d′. Interactions between drugs and age groups demonstrated that amphetamine affected the younger boys to a significantly greater degree than the older children for both d′ and response bias or β. It is notable that the results were essentially parallel for both normal and hyperactive children.

[1]  A. Sostek Effects of electrodermal lability and payoff instructions on vigilance performance. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[2]  E. Balka,et al.  Amitriptyline and methylphenidate treatment of behaviorally disordered children. , 1977, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  C. Conners,et al.  Symptom Patterns in Hyperkinetic, Neurotic, and Normal Children. , 1970 .

[4]  J. F. Mackworth THE EFFECT OF AMPHETAMINE ON THE DETECTABILITY OF SIGNALS IN A VIGILANCE TASK. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  F. Lévy,et al.  The development of sustained attention (vigilance) and inhibition in children: some normative data. , 1980, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  B. Cornblatt,et al.  Sustained attention in children at risk for schizophrenia. Report on a continuous performance test. , 1977, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  J. M. Grossberg,et al.  Clinical psychophysics: applications of ratio scaling and signal detection methods to research on pain, fear, drugs, and medical decision making. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  The influence of d-amphetamine, benactyzine, and chlorpromazine on performance in an auditory vigilance task , 1965, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[10]  T. Allen,et al.  An examination of attention, arousal, and learning dysfunctions of hyperkinetic children. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Autonomic and behavioral effects of dextroamphetamine and placebo in normal and hyperactive prepubertal boys , 1980, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[12]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[13]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Signal probability and vigilance: a reappraisal of the 'signal-rate' effect. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[14]  S. Kupietz,et al.  Children's vigilance performance and inattentiveness in the classroom. , 1978, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  The Effects of Methylphenidate Dosage on the Visual Event Related Potential of Hyperactive Children , 1979 .

[16]  M S Buchsbaum,et al.  Dextroamphetamine: cognitive and behavioral effects in normal prepubertal boys. , 1978, Science.

[17]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Vigilance and human attention under conditions of methylphenidate and secobarbital intoxication: an assessment using brain potentials. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Michel Loeb,et al.  Variation in performance on auditory and visual monitoring tasks as a function of signal and stimulus frequencies , 1968 .