Using Tree Diagrams as an Assessment Tool in Statistics Education

This study examines the potential of the tree diagram, a type of graphic organizer, as an assessment tool to measure students' knowledge structures in statistics education. Students' knowledge structures in statistics have not been sufficiently assessed in statistics, despite their importance. This article first presents the rationale and method for using tree diagrams as assessment tools in statistics education, followed by an empirical study examining the technical quality of tree diagram assessment. Thirty-seven university students enrolled in an introductory statistics course, and four statistics experts participated in the study. The results provide evidence of reliability and validity for the proposed function of using tree diagrams to measure knowledge structures in statistics education. As reliability evidence, the interrater reliability of tree diagram scoring is high (Pearson's r = .96); alpha coefficient of the 21 linked vertex pairs in tree diagrams is .89. As validity evidence, experts performed better than novices on the tree diagram assessment; students' performance with the tree diagram is significantly correlated with their performance on statistics achievement tests (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = .62); tree diagrams are sensitive to the discrepancies in students' knowledge structures, and most students considered tree diagrams helpful to their organization of statistics knowledge.

[1]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[2]  Pamela J. Dunston,et al.  A critique of graphic organizer research , 1991 .

[3]  Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo,et al.  Windows into the mind , 2005 .

[4]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[5]  R. Shavelson,et al.  On the Validity of Cognitive Interpretations of Scores From Alternative Concept-Mapping Techniques , 2001 .

[6]  C A Nelson,et al.  Learning to Learn , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[7]  M. Gleason,et al.  Using Graphic Organizers to Attain Relational Knowledge From Expository Text , 2002, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of Two Concept-Mapping Techniques: Implications for Scoring, Interpretation, and Use. , 2005 .

[9]  Diana C. Rice,et al.  Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in the Science Classroom: Must Different Methods Compete?. , 1998 .

[10]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding , 1999 .

[11]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Application of Generalizability Theory to Concept Map Assessment Research , 2004 .

[12]  Parmalee P. Hawk,et al.  Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science , 1986 .

[13]  Stephania Braselton,et al.  Using Graphic Organizers to Improve the Reading of Mathematics. , 1994 .

[14]  L. Malone,et al.  Effects of Graphic Organizer Instruction on Fifth-Grade Students , 1995 .

[15]  B. Ives Graphic Organizers Applied to Secondary Algebra Instruction for Students with Learning Disorders , 2007 .

[16]  D. Ball With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Why Graphic Organizers Facilitate Search Processes: Fewer Words or Computationally Efficient Indexing? , 1996 .

[18]  M. Wolf,et al.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  Sarah Guri‐Rozenblit Effects of a Tree Diagram on Students' Comprehension of Main Ideas in an Expository Text with Multiple Themes. , 1989 .

[20]  Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo,et al.  Windows into the mind. Higher Education , 2005 .

[21]  Candace Schau,et al.  Use of Map Techniques in Teaching Applied Statistics Courses , 1997 .

[22]  Andrew D. Katayama,et al.  Getting Students “Partially” Involved in Note-Taking Using Graphic Organizers , 2000 .

[23]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Computational Efficiency through Visual Argument: Do Graphic Organizers Communicate Relations in Text Too Effectively?. , 1994 .

[24]  Anthony J. Nitko,et al.  Solving Problems Is Not Enough: Assessing and Diagnosing the Ways in Which Students Organize Statistical Concepts. , 1990 .

[25]  Using Propositions for the Assessment of Structural Knowledge , 2009 .

[26]  Brad W. Baxendell Consistent, Coherent, Creative: The 3 C's of Graphic Organizers , 2003 .

[27]  J. Minstrell,et al.  Teaching Science for Understanding , 1989 .

[28]  Joan Garfield,et al.  The Challenge of Developing Statistical Reasoning , 2002 .

[29]  H. Suen,et al.  Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality , 1999 .

[30]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[31]  Simonne Pollini,et al.  Teaching Cause—Effect Text Structure Through Social Studies Content to At-Risk Second Graders , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  James P. Barufaldi,et al.  The effects of a combination of text structure awareness and graphic postorganizers on recall and retention of science knowledge , 1994 .

[33]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept‐mapping techniques* , 2001 .

[34]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[35]  S. Kay On the Nature of Expertise. , 1992 .

[36]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom , 1996 .

[37]  J. Novak Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[38]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[39]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[40]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[41]  L. Roberts,et al.  Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding , 1999 .

[42]  Nancy C. Lavigne Mutually Informative Measures of Knowledge: Concept Maps Plus Problem Sorts in Statistics , 2005 .

[43]  E. Yalow On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .