Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region

[1]  R. Gregory,et al.  Public perceptions of electric power transmission lines , 1988 .

[2]  J. Klayman.  Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .

[3]  T. Fiddaman.  Exploring policy options with a behavioral climate–economy model , 2002 .

[4]  Elizabeth Devlin,et al.  Factors Affecting Public Acceptance of Wind Turbines in Sweden , 2005 .

[5]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[6]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[7]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[8]  M. Cichon,et al.  Energy and Climate Change , 1997, Energy Exploration & Exploitation.

[9]  Claire Haggett.  Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms , 2008 .

[10]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience , 2009 .

[11]  C. Saunders,et al.  Sustainable development and equity , 2009 .

[12]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Landscape externalities from onshore wind power , 2010 .

[13]  C. Okereke.  Climate justice and the international regime , 2010 .

[14]  Birgitte Egelund Olsen.  Wind Energy and Local Acceptance: How to Get Beyond the Nimby Effect , 2010, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[15]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Visible technologies, invisible organisations: An empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply networks , 2010 .

[17]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[18]  John W. Murphy,et al.  Toward a post-market society , 2011 .

[19]  R. Belmans,et al.  Transmission investment problems in Europe: Going beyond standard solutions , 2011 .

[20]  Geraint Ellis,et al.  Large‐scale wind deployment, social acceptance , 2012 .

[21]  B. Hobbs,et al.  The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty , 2012 .

[22]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Perception of barriers for expansion of electricity grids in the European Union , 2012 .

[23]  R. Lifran,et al.  The case for offshore wind farms, artificial reefs and sustainable tourism in the French mediterranean , 2013 .

[24]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project , 2013 .

[25]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Public beliefs about high-voltage powerlines in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A comparative survey , 2014 .

[26]  J. Cohen,et al.  Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review , 2014 .

[27]  Neil Strachan,et al.  A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models , 2015 .

[28]  Liz Varga,et al.  Energy and complexity: New ways forward , 2015 .

[29]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  A critical and empirical analysis of the national-local ‘gap’ in public responses to large-scale energy infrastructures , 2015 .

[30]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK , 2015 .

[31]  S. Ruutu,et al.  Prospects of modelling societal transitions : position paper of an emerging community , 2015 .

[32]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects , 2016 .

[33]  K. Menrad,et al.  A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria , 2016 .

[34]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany , 2016 .

[35]  Heiko Thomas,et al.  Superconducting transmission lines – Sustainable electric energy transfer with higher public acceptance? , 2016 .

[36]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Understanding the role of trust in power line development projects: Evidence from two case studies in Norway , 2017 .

[37]  Christophe Claramunt,et al.  Evaluating the Visual Impact of an Offshore Wind Farm , 2017 .

[38]  A. Tomasgard,et al.  The impact of policy actions and future energy prices on the cost-optimal development of the energy system in Norway and Sweden , 2017 .

[39]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[40]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Stakeholder empowerment through participatory planning practices: The case of electricity transmission lines in France and Norway , 2017 .

[41]  M. Jørgensen,et al.  Navigations and governance in the Danish energy transition reflecting changing Arenas of Development, controversies and policy mixes , 2017 .

[42]  Laura Tolnov Clausen,et al.  Wind2050 – a transdisciplinary research partnership about wind energy , 2017 .

[43]  Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir,et al.  When tourists meet transmission lines: The effects of electric transmission lines on tourism in Iceland , 2017 .

[44]  M. Fortin,et al.  From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: towards a territorial perspective , 2017 .

[45]  M. Wolsink.  Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[46]  Johannes Schmidt,et al.  A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind energy , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[47]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  Assessing qualitative and quantitative dimensions of uncertainty in energy modelling for policy support in the United Kingdom , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[48]  T. Bolkesjø,et al.  A review of demand side flexibility potential in Northern Europe , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[49]  Frances Fahy,et al.  Developing transdisciplinary approaches to community energy transitions: An island case study , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[50]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[51]  K. Borch.  Mapping value perspectives on wind power projects: The case of the danish test centre for large wind turbines , 2018, Energy Policy.

[52]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public acceptance of high-voltage power lines: The influence of information provision on undergrounding , 2018 .

[53]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Co-production in distributed generation: renewable energy and creating space for fitting infrastructure within landscapes , 2018 .

[54]  B. Sovacool,et al.  Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework , 2018 .

[55]  Karl Sperling,et al.  Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power , 2018, Energies.

[56]  R. Sardaro,et al.  High-voltage overhead transmission lines and farmland value: Evidences from the real estate market in Apulia, southern Italy , 2018, Energy Policy.

[57]  Marie Münster,et al.  Balmorel open source energy system model , 2018 .

[58]  J. Firestone,et al.  Power transmission: Where the offshore wind energy comes home , 2018, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[59]  D. Copena,et al.  Strong wind development with no community participation. The case of Galicia (1995–2009) , 2019, Energy Policy.

[60]  P. Wells,et al.  An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[61]  Isabelle Stadelmann‐Steffen.  Bad news is bad news: Information effects and citizens’ socio-political acceptance of new technologies of electricity transmission , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[62]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[63]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  From Carbon Calculators to Energy System Analysis in Cities , 2019, Energies.

[64]  O. Raaschou-Nielsen,et al.  Long-Term Exposure to Wind Turbine Noise and Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A Nationwide Cohort Study , 2019, Environmental health perspectives.

[65]  S. Bolwig,et al.  Pathway Analysis of a Zero-Emission Transition in the Nordic-Baltic Region , 2019, Energies.

[66]  O. Raaschou-Nielsen,et al.  Impact of Long-Term Exposure to Wind Turbine Noise on Redemption of Sleep Medication and Antidepressants: A Nationwide Cohort Study , 2019, Environmental health perspectives.

[67]  H. Ravn,et al.  The role of cross-border power transmission in a renewable-rich power system - A model analysis for Northwestern Europe. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[68]  K. Borch,et al.  Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance , 2020 .