Reducing pollution at five critical points of shale gas production: Strategies and institutional responses

While the public and governments debate the advisability of engaging in shale gas production, the United States has proceeded to develop its resources with an accompanying remarkable increase in natural gas production. The development of shale gas has not been without problems, and some countries have decided that shale gas production should not proceed until more is known about the accompanying health issues and environmental damages. From experiences in the United States, careful consideration of five critical points relating to shale gas production can form the basis for developing strategies for reducing discharges of pollutants: (1) casing and cementing, (2) handling wastewater, (3) venting and flaring, (4) equipment with air emissions, and (5) seismic events. For each strategy, institutional responses to markedly reduce the risks of harm to people and the environment are identified. These responses offer state and local governments ideas for enabling shale gas resources to be developed without sacrificing public health and environmental quality.

[1]  Qingmin Meng,et al.  Spatial analysis of environment and population at risk of natural gas fracking in the state of Pennsylvania, USA. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Gbenga Ibikunle,et al.  Determinants of Renewable Energy Growth: A Global Sample Analysis , 2014 .

[3]  R. Kerr Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. , 2010, Science.

[4]  Cliff Frohlich,et al.  Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  T. Centner,et al.  Local governments want authority to address problems: The case of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the United States , 2015 .

[6]  C. Frohlich,et al.  Two-year survey of earthquakes and injection/production wells in the Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, prior to the MW4.8 20 October 2011 earthquake , 2013 .

[7]  T. Centner Oversight of shale gas production in the United States and the disclosure of toxic substances , 2013 .

[8]  R. Jackson,et al.  A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  B. Kutchko,et al.  An approach for assessing engineering risk from shale gas wells in the United States , 2014 .

[10]  M. Hitzman,et al.  Induced Seismicity Potential of Energy Technologies , 2013 .

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Paul Upham,et al.  Addressing social representations in socio-technical transitions with the case of shale gas , 2015 .

[13]  Matthew R. Johnson,et al.  Opportunities for CO2 equivalent emissions reductions via flare and vent mitigation: A case study for Alberta, Canada , 2012 .

[14]  Garvin A. Heath,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from Barnett Shale gas used to generate electricity , 2014 .

[15]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States , 2014 .

[16]  S. Ge,et al.  High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity , 2015, Science.

[17]  J. Abad,et al.  Water resource impacts during unconventional shale gas development: The Pennsylvania experience , 2014 .

[18]  R. Jackson,et al.  The effects of shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing on the quality of water resources in the United States , 2013 .

[19]  J. Abad,et al.  Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality , 2013, Science.

[20]  R. Jackson,et al.  Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  O. S. Ismail,et al.  Global Impact of Gas Flaring , 2012 .

[22]  Terence J. Centner,et al.  Permitting program with best management practices for shale gas wells to safeguard public health. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Mohammad Reaza Rahimpour,et al.  Feasibility of flare gas reformation to practical energy in Farashband gas refinery: no gas flaring. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  N. Abas,et al.  Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies , 2015 .

[25]  Justin L. Rubinstein,et al.  Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity , 2015 .

[26]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands , 2015 .

[27]  Katherine E. Konschnik,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals Reporting: Analysis of Available Data and Recommendations for Policymakers , 2016 .

[28]  Keith B. Hall Hydraulic Fracturing: Trade Secrets and the Mandatory Disclosure of Fracturing Water Composition , 2013 .

[29]  Christopher E. Clarke,et al.  Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology , 2015 .

[30]  Timothy T Eaton,et al.  Science-based decision-making on complex issues: Marcellus shale gas hydrofracking and New York City water supply. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Renjin Sun,et al.  A comprehensive environmental impact assessment method for shale gas development , 2015 .

[33]  T. Colborn,et al.  Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective , 2011 .

[34]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Regional air quality impacts of hydraulic fracturing and shale natural gas activity: Evidence from ambient VOC observations , 2014 .

[35]  Timothy J. Considine,et al.  Environmental regulation and compliance of Marcellus Shale gas drilling , 2013 .

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  David A. Dana,et al.  A Market Approach to Regulating the Energy Revolution: Assurance Bonds, Insurance, and the Certain and Uncertain Risks of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2015 .

[38]  Barry G Rabe,et al.  Shale play politics: the intergovernmental Odyssey of American shale governance. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Juan Roberto,et al.  The United States experience as a reference of success for shale gas development: The case of Mexico , 2013 .

[40]  Sue Vink,et al.  Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  M. Melikoğlu Shale gas: Analysis of its role in the global energy market , 2014 .

[42]  Bret Wells Please Give Us One More Oil Boom – I Promise Not to Screw It Up this Time: The Broken Promise of Casinghead Gas Flaring in the Eagle Ford Shale , 2014 .

[43]  Liam G. Herringshaw,et al.  Oil and gas wells and their integrity : implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation , 2014 .

[44]  Robert B Jackson,et al.  The integrity of oil and gas wells , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  E. McFarland Unconventional Chemistry for Unconventional Natural Gas , 2012, Science.

[46]  Benjamin Sovacool Cornucopia or Curse? Reviewing the Costs and Benefits of Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking) , 2014 .

[47]  B. Rabe,et al.  Taxing Fracking: The Politics of State Severance Taxes in the Shale Era , 2015 .