Devices for Self-Monitoring Sedentary Time or Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

Background It is well documented that meeting the guideline levels (150 minutes per week) of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) is protective against chronic disease. Conversely, emerging evidence indicates the deleterious effects of prolonged sitting. Therefore, there is a need to change both behaviors. Self-monitoring of behavior is one of the most robust behavior-change techniques available. The growing number of technologies in the consumer electronics sector provides a unique opportunity for individuals to self-monitor their behavior. Objective The aim of this study is to review the characteristics and measurement properties of currently available self-monitoring devices for sedentary time and/or PA. Methods To identify technologies, four scientific databases were systematically searched using key terms related to behavior, measurement, and population. Articles published through October 2015 were identified. To identify technologies from the consumer electronic sector, systematic searches of three Internet search engines were also performed through to October 1, 2015. Results The initial database searches identified 46 devices and the Internet search engines identified 100 devices yielding a total of 146 technologies. Of these, 64 were further removed because they were currently unavailable for purchase or there was no evidence that they were designed for, had been used in, or could readily be modified for self-monitoring purposes. The remaining 82 technologies were included in this review (73 devices self-monitored PA, 9 devices self-monitored sedentary time). Of the 82 devices included, this review identified no published articles in which these devices were used for the purpose of self-monitoring PA and/or sedentary behavior; however, a number of technologies were found via Internet searches that matched the criteria for self-monitoring and provided immediate feedback on PA (ActiGraph Link, Microsoft Band, and Garmin Vivofit) and sedentary time (activPAL VT, the Lumo Back, and Darma). Conclusions There are a large number of devices that self-monitor PA; however, there is a greater need for the development of tools to self-monitor sedentary time. The novelty of these devices means they have yet to be used in behavior change interventions, although the growing field of wearable technology may facilitate this to change.

[1]  A. Ian Glendon,et al.  Can anti-speeding messages based on protection motivation theory influence reported speeding intentions? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Andrew T. Kaczynski,et al.  Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  John C. Sieverdes,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor , 2013, Clinical epidemiology.

[4]  M. Sevick,et al.  Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. , 2011, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  Alberto G Bonomi,et al.  Estimation of Free‐Living Energy Expenditure Using a Novel Activity Monitor Designed to Minimize Obtrusiveness , 2010, Obesity.

[6]  J. Vanhelst,et al.  Validation of the Vivago Wrist-Worn accelerometer in the assessment of physical activity , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[7]  P. Katzmarzyk,et al.  The physical activity transition. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[8]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials , 2014, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[11]  Ali K. Yetisen,et al.  Mobile Medical Applications , 2015 .

[12]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  A model for improving quality of decisions in mobile health , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Gregory J. Welk,et al.  Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  Jeremy N. Morris,et al.  Walking to Health , 1997, Sports medicine.

[16]  S. Schachter Quality of life for patients with epilepsy is determined by more than seizure control: the role of psychosocial factors , 2006, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[17]  Lucas J Carr,et al.  Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours". , 2012, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  A. Ian Glendon,et al.  Young drivers’ responses to anti-speeding and anti-drink-driving messages , 2003 .

[20]  R. J. Shephard,et al.  Breaks in Sedentary Time: Beneficial associations with metabolic risk , 2010 .

[21]  Tim Olds,et al.  The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[22]  Allison Gates,et al.  Evaluating User Perceptions of Mobile Medication Management Applications With Older Adults: A Usability Study , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[23]  Matthew P Buman,et al.  Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  F. H. Kanfer,et al.  Self-management methods. , 1991 .

[25]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[26]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[27]  M. O'Kane,et al.  Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  John C. Sieverdes,et al.  Validation of the mywellness key in walking and running speeds. , 2012, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[29]  C. Carver,et al.  Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Raymond C Browning,et al.  A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[32]  Claire F Fitzsimons Scottish physical activity research collaboration , 2009 .

[33]  R. Silverman,et al.  Mobile health applications: the patchwork of legal and liability issues suggests strategies to improve oversight. , 2014, Health affairs.

[34]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Thea J. M. Kooiman,et al.  Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers , 2015, BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[36]  G Plasqui,et al.  Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[37]  M. Granat,et al.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[38]  J. Takács,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[39]  Matthew P Buman,et al.  Validity and reliability of Nike + Fuelband for estimating physical activity energy expenditure , 2015, BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[40]  C. Abraham,et al.  Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[41]  Eric J. Topol,et al.  The emerging field of mobile health , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[42]  Edward L. Melanson,et al.  Accuracy Of Fitbit Activity Monitor To Predict Energy Expenditure With And Without Classification Of Activities: 725 , 2011 .

[43]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[44]  K. Khunti,et al.  Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Diabetologia.

[45]  S. Chastin,et al.  Methods for objective measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[46]  M. Granat,et al.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[47]  B. Wansink,et al.  Factors Related to Sustained Use of a Free Mobile App for Dietary Self-Monitoring With Photography and Peer Feedback: Retrospective Cohort Study , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.