Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study

Introduction Millions of acute care hospital patients need a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) each year. However, up to half of PIVCs remain in situ when not being used, and 30%–50% of intravenous (IV) catheters develop complications or stop working before treatment is finished, requiring the insertion of a new device. Improved assessment could prompt timely removal of redundant catheters and prevent IV complications. This study aims to validate an evidence-based PIVC assessment and decision-making tool called I-DECIDED and evaluate the effect of implementing this tool into acute hospital clinical practice. Methods and analysis The protocol outlines a prospective, multicentre, mixed-methods study using an interrupted time-series (multiple measures preintervention and postintervention) implementation at three Australian hospitals between August 2017 and July 2018. The study will examine the effectiveness of the I-DECIDED assessment and decision-making tool in clinical practice on prompting timely PIVC removal and early detection of complications. Primary outcomes are prevalence of redundant PIVCs (defined as device in situ without a clear purpose), IV complications (occlusion, dislodgement, infiltration, extravasation and phlebitis) and substandard dressings (loose, lifting, moist or soiled); device utilisation ratios; and primary bloodstream infection rates. Secondary outcomes including staff barriers and enablers to PIVC assessment and removal, patient participation, documentation of PIVC assessment and decisions taken to continue or remove the PIVC will be recorded. Using the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we will undertake staff focus groups, bedside patient interviews and PIVC assessments and chart audits. Patients aged 18 years or more with a PIVC will be eligible for inclusion. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/17/QPCH/47), Griffith University (Ref No. 2017/152) and St Vincent’s Health and Aged Care Human Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No. 17/28). Results will be published. Trial registration number ANZCTR: 12617000067370; Pre-results.

[1]  D. McHugh,et al.  Review article: Idle ‘just‐in‐case’ peripheral intravenous cannulas in the emergency department: Is something wrong? , 2018, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[2]  M. Wallis,et al.  Not "just" an intravenous line: Consumer perspectives on peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). An international cross-sectional survey of 25 countries , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  S. Keogh,et al.  Experiences of peripheral IV insertion in hospital: a qualitative study. , 2017, British journal of nursing.

[4]  J. Webster,et al.  Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure , 2017, Journal of hospital medicine.

[5]  M. Alexander A Search for Tools to Support Decision-Making for PIVC Use. , 2017, Journal of Hospital Medicine.

[6]  K. Göransson,et al.  Measurement of peripheral venous catheter-related phlebitis: a cross-sectional study. , 2017, The Lancet. Haematology.

[7]  G. Ray-Barruel,et al.  Peripheral intravenous catheter assessment: beyond phlebitis. , 2017, The Lancet. Haematology.

[8]  L. Drager,et al.  Project HANDS: A Bundled Approach to Increase Short Peripheral Catheter Dwell Time , 2017, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[9]  H. Sanada,et al.  Removal of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Due to Catheter Failures Among Adult Patients , 2017, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[10]  P. Astagneau,et al.  Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Adverse Events: Evaluation from a Multicentre Epidemiological Study in France (the CATHEVAL Project) , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  N. Safdar,et al.  Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of idle intravenous catheters: An integrative review. , 2016, American journal of infection control.

[12]  A. Cheng,et al.  Reducing Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections associated with peripheral intravenous cannulae: successful implementation of a care bundle at a large Australian health service. , 2016, The Journal of hospital infection.

[13]  G. Mihala,et al.  Varied flushing frequency and volume to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial in adult medical-surgical hospital patients , 2016, Trials.

[14]  Li Zhang,et al.  Infection risks associated with peripheral vascular catheters , 2016, Journal of infection prevention.

[15]  Patricia S. Mancos,et al.  Protected Clinical Indication of Peripheral Intravenous Lines: Successful Implementation , 2016 .

[16]  R. Evans,et al.  The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) initiative: A summary and review of peripherally inserted central catheter and venous catheter appropriate use. , 2016, Journal of hospital medicine.

[17]  F. Lowy,et al.  Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Is an Underrecognized Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection , 2016, Open forum infectious diseases.

[18]  A. Bodenham,et al.  Development of the UK Vessel Health and Preservation (VHP) framework: a multi-organisational collaborative , 2016, Journal of infection prevention.

[19]  D. Bolton Clinically indicated replacement of peripheral cannulas. , 2015, British journal of nursing.

[20]  M. Wallis,et al.  Inter-rater agreement on PIVC-associated phlebitis signs, symptoms and scales. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[21]  F. Davidoff,et al.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process. , 2015, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[22]  V. Chopra,et al.  The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  K. Holt,et al.  The Effectiveness of Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: An Evidence Review With Implications for Clinical Practice. , 2015, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[24]  N. Marsh,et al.  Nursing and midwifery practice for maintenance of vascular access device patency. A cross-sectional survey. , 2015, International journal of nursing studies.

[25]  L. Mermel,et al.  International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. , 2015, Journal of hospital medicine.

[26]  M. Wallis,et al.  Postinfusion Phlebitis: Incidence and Risk Factors , 2015, Nursing research and practice.

[27]  G. Goossens Flushing and Locking of Venous Catheters: Available Evidence and Evidence Deficit , 2015, Nursing research and practice.

[28]  J. Klausner,et al.  Accepted but Unacceptable: Peripheral IV Catheter Failure , 2015, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[29]  R. McGuire Assessing standards of vascular access device care. , 2015, British journal of nursing.

[30]  C. Padula,et al.  Knowing 'something is not right' is beyond intuition: development of a clinical algorithm to enhance surveillance and assist nurses to organise and communicate clinical findings. , 2015, Journal of clinical nursing.

[31]  J. Webster,et al.  Intravascular device use, management, documentation and complications: a point prevalence survey. , 2014, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[32]  Louise Locock,et al.  Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  N. Sevdalis,et al.  Fragmentation of Care Threatens Patient Safety in Peripheral Vascular Catheter Management in Acute Care– A Qualitative Study , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  P. Scuffham,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Indicated Versus Routine Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters , 2014, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

[35]  D. Polit,et al.  Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review , 2014, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[36]  M. Wallis,et al.  Risk Factors for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure: A Multivariate Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[37]  R. Chan,et al.  A point prevalence study of cancer nursing practices for managing intravascular devices in an Australian tertiary cancer center. , 2013, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[38]  Robert B. Penfold,et al.  Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. , 2013, Academic pediatrics.

[39]  T. Buckley,et al.  The impact structured patient assessment frameworks have on patient care: an integrative review. , 2013, Journal of clinical nursing.

[40]  R. Stuart,et al.  Half of all peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain? , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[41]  F. Bella,et al.  Impact of a multimodal intervention to reduce bloodstream infections related to vascular catheters in non-ICU wards: a multicentre study. , 2013, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[42]  J. Rodríguez-Baño,et al.  Successful multifaceted intervention aimed to reduce short peripheral venous catheter-related adverse events: a quasiexperimental cohort study. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[43]  E. Gillespie,et al.  Peripheral intravenous catheter‐associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: more than 5 years of prospective data from two tertiary health services , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[44]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[45]  L. Hadaway Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters and Infections , 2012, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[46]  S. Szpunar,et al.  Sustained Improvements in Peripheral Venous Catheter Care in Non–Intensive Care Units: A Quasi-Experimental Controlled Study of Education and Feedback , 2012, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[47]  D. Polit,et al.  Statistical process control in nursing research. , 2012, Research in nursing & health.

[48]  D. Stannard Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2012 .

[49]  D. Phelan,et al.  Vessel Health and Preservation (Part 1): A New Evidence-Based Approach to Vascular Access Selection and Management , 2012, The journal of vascular access.

[50]  A. Palese,et al.  Factors Influencing Nurses' Decision-Making Process on Leaving in the Peripheral Intravascular Catheter After 96 Hours: A Longitudinal Study , 2011, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[51]  H. Humphreys,et al.  Implementing peripheral vascular catheter care bundle in a tertiary care hospital: No room for complacency? , 2011 .

[52]  B. Dimitrov,et al.  Role of Patient Awareness in Prevention of Peripheral Vascular Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection , 2011, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[53]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Clinical review: Checklists - translating evidence into practice , 2009, Critical care.

[55]  A. Willman,et al.  Nurses' clinical reasoning concerning management of peripheral venous cannulae. , 2009, Journal of clinical nursing.

[56]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[57]  A. Willman,et al.  Registered nurses' adherence to clinical guidelines regarding peripheral venous catheters: a structured observational study. , 2008, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[58]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[59]  R. Barbour Doing Focus Groups , 2008 .

[60]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[61]  B. Hales,et al.  Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[62]  M. Wilcox,et al.  epic3: National Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections in NHS Hospitals in England , 2007, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[63]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[64]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  The PARIHS framework--a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. , 2004, Journal of nursing care quality.

[65]  A. Randolph,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[66]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2001 .

[67]  Leanne Boyd,et al.  The prevalence of peripheral intravenous cannulae and pattern of use: A point prevalence in a private hospital setting , 2018, Journal of clinical nursing.

[68]  L. Yagnik,et al.  Plastic in patient study: Prospective audit of adherence to peripheral intravenous cannula monitoring and documentation guidelines, with the aim of reducing future rates of intravenous cannula‐related complications , 2017, American journal of infection control.

[69]  Ying Hua Grace Tan,et al.  Optimising peripheral venous catheter usage in the general inpatient ward: a prospective observational study , 2017, Journal of clinical nursing.

[70]  A. Ullman,et al.  Randomised controlled trials in peripheral vascular access catheters: a scoping review , 2017 .

[71]  Julie Helton,et al.  Peripheral IV Site Rotation Based on Clinical Assessment vs. Length of Time Since Insertion. , 2016, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[72]  Peninnah Oberdorfer,et al.  Effectiveness of peripheral vascular catheter care bundle in the Pediatric Nursing Service, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand , 2014 .

[73]  C. Greensitt,et al.  HANDS: standardised intravascular practice based on evidence. , 2012, British journal of nursing.

[74]  M. Dowling,et al.  Early breast cancer: diagnosis, treatment and survivorship. , 2012, British journal of nursing.

[75]  D. Nathwani,et al.  Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality improvement and safer patient care. , 2011, The Journal of hospital infection.

[76]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[77]  Claire Rickard,et al.  Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[78]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. , 2009, International journal of antimicrobial agents.