The U.S. Army’s Engagement Skills Trainer (EST) uses sensors on simulated weapons to collect valuable data about a soldier’s performance during marksmanship exercises. That data is available to an instructor for coaching and remediation purposes. However, experience shows that accessing the data, reviewing the data, and providing feedback to a trainee can be a time consuming process. This environment presents challenges when considering the number of trainees who must complete this training and the limited number of instructors available. This also assumes that instructors are capable of accurately interpreting the data and applying effective remediation. Simulators like the EST are prime candidates for the incorporation of an Intelligent Tutoring System’s (ITS) capabilities. The goals of an ITS are to collect data from a system, make inference on that data as it relates to defined metrics, and to provide formative feedback when data is found to deviate from a specified standard. For this purpose, a system requires models to compare data against. In this paper, we will present the results of the first phase of a study to apply ITS technology to the fundamentals of marksmanship. Models created in this phase will be integrated into an adaptive training system prototype built within the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) for future experimentation. Data was collected across eight experts from the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit’s service rifle team as they conducted marksmanship tasks. These models are built around sensor data collected during execution, with each sensor being selected based on their link to the fundamentals of marksmanship. We will review the techniques applied to the data for model construction, trends found in the data that are generalized across each expert, and how the models will be used to diagnose error and trigger remediation.
[1]
Jean L. Dyer,et al.
Rifle Marksmanship Diagnostic and Training Guide
,
2011
.
[2]
Graham Cooper,et al.
Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW
,
2008
.
[3]
Robert A. Sottilare,et al.
The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT)
,
2012
.
[4]
Chris Berka,et al.
An Exploratory Investigation of the Effect of Individualized Computer-Based Instruction on Rifle Marksmanship Performance and Skill. CRESST Report 754.
,
2009
.
[5]
Dick Stottler,et al.
Transitioning an ITS Developed for Schoolhouse Use to the Fleet: TAO ITS, a Case Study
,
2001
.
[6]
Chris Berka,et al.
Characterizing the Psychophysiological Profile of Expert and Novice Marksmen
,
2009,
HCI.
[7]
K. VanLehn.
The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems
,
2011
.