Geographic and sociodemographic variation in self-reported seat belt use in the United States.

BACKGROUND With new data available, we sought to update existing literature on the prevalence of self-reported seat belt use by state, region, and rural/urban status and to estimate the strength of the association between seat belt use and rural/urban status adjusted for type of seat belt law and several other factors. METHODS We examined data on self-reported use of seat belts from 50 states, the District of Columbia, and three territories using the 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based random-digit-dialed telephone survey (n=406,552). Reported seat belt use was assessed by state, U.S. Census regions, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) rural/urban continuum codes. RESULTS Overall, 85% of adults in the United States reported they always used seat belts. Regionally, the West had the highest prevalence of persons who reported that they always wear seat belts (89.6%) and the Midwest had the lowest (80.4%). States with primary seat belt laws had the highest prevalence of reported seat belt use, compared with states with secondary or no laws. After adjusting for various sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index, and type of seat belt law, persons in the most densely populated metropolitan areas were significantly more likely to report always wearing seat belts than those in most sparsely populated rural areas (adjusted odds ratio=2.9). CONCLUSION Our findings reinforce the evidence that primary enforcement seat belt laws are effective for increasing seat belt use, and suggest that upgrading to primary enforcement laws will be an important strategy for reducing crash-related fatalities in rural areas.

[1]  C J Kahane,et al.  Fatality reduction by safety belts for front-seat occupants of cars and light trucks : updated and expanded estimates based on 1986-99 FARS data , 2000 .

[2]  J. Jakub,et al.  The economic impact of motor vehicle crashes: the cost of restrained versus unrestrained occupants in South Carolina. , 2002, The American surgeon.

[3]  T D Peterson,et al.  Cost savings associated with increased safety belt use in Iowa, 1987-1988. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  James L Nichols,et al.  Primary enforcement seat belt laws are effective even in the face of rising belt use rates. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  D E Nelson,et al.  Validity of self reported data on injury prevention behavior: lessons from observational and self reported surveys of safety belt use in the US. , 1996, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[6]  Madhuri S. Mulekar,et al.  Increased Mortality in Rural Vehicular Trauma: Identifying Contributing Factors Through Data Linkage , 2006 .

[7]  D E Nelson,et al.  Trends in safety belt use by demographics and by type of state safety belt law, 1987 through 1993. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[8]  David J Houston,et al.  Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law: the California experience. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  D E Nelson,et al.  Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). , 2001, Sozial- und Praventivmedizin.

[10]  K. Maull,et al.  Injury and cost comparison of restrained and unrestrained motor vehicle crash victims , 1988 .

[11]  E. Orsay,et al.  Prospective study of the effect of safety belts on morbidity and health care costs in motor-vehicle accidents. , 1988, JAMA.

[12]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES, 2000 , 2002 .

[13]  Bobbi Jo Perkins,et al.  Attitudes toward a primary seat belt law among adults in a rural state with a secondary seat belt law. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[14]  F P Rivara,et al.  Effectiveness of primary and secondary enforced seat belt laws. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  K I Maull,et al.  Injury and cost comparison of restrained and unrestrained motor vehicle crash victims. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  L Evans,et al.  The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  R. Rutledge,et al.  The cost of not wearing seat belts. A comparison of outcome in 3396 patients. , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[18]  Ruth A Shults,et al.  Associations between sociodemographics and safety belt use in states with and without primary enforcement laws. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[19]  J M Boyle,et al.  2003 motor vehicle occupant safety survey. Volume 2, Safety belt report , 2008 .

[20]  Shankuan Zhu,et al.  A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[21]  L. Einav,et al.  The Effects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Traffic Fatalities , 2003 .

[22]  Nicholas J. Ward,et al.  The culture of traffic safety in rural America , 2007 .

[23]  David J Houston,et al.  Getting Americans to buckle up: the efficacy of state seat belt laws. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  R A Cowley,et al.  Seatbelt effectiveness and cost of noncompliance among drivers admitted to a trauma center. , 1991, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  Americancollegeofemergencyphy.  Motor vehicle safety , 1985 .

[26]  D. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[27]  Ali H Mokdad,et al.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[29]  Randy W. Elder,et al.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase the use of safety belts. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.