A Small Company of Actors

The concept of style has been central to material culture studies for the past 50 years. During this time, the main problem of style has been one of defi nition. Whether cultural evolutionist, processualist or constructivist, the problem of 'what is style' has remained problematic. This paper attempts to go beyond the quest for a definition of style to question the foundations of the categorization of the world into style and utility, and, through the work of others, challenge the dualist doctrine that constitutes our view of the material world and our relation to it.

[1]  P. Ricoeur.  Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences , 1981 .

[2]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[3]  Paul A. Shackel.  Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social life in Britain, 2900‐1200 BC. John C. Barrett , 1994 .

[4]  P. Wiessner.  Style or Isochrestic Variation? A Reply to Sackett , 1985, American Antiquity.

[5]  P. Wiessner.  Reconsidering the Behavioral Basis for Style: A Case Study among the Kalahari San , 1984 .

[6]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[7]  Michael P. Hoffman,et al.  The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics , 1965 .

[8]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Humans and Others, Agents and Things , 1994 .

[9]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[10]  Donald Davidson,et al.  On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme , 1973 .

[11]  Lewis R. Binford,et al.  "Red Ocher" Caches from the Michigan Area: A Possible Case of Cultural Drift , 1963, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology.

[12]  Colin Richards,et al.  Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 , 1995 .

[13]  J. Sackett.  Approaches to style in lithic archaeology , 1982 .

[14]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Pragmatogonies: A Mythical Account of How Humans and Nonhumans Swap Properties , 1994 .

[15]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[16]  Michael Shanks,et al.  Social Theory And Archaeology , 1988 .

[17]  Robin Benville Boast.  The categorisation and design systematics of British Beakers : a re-examination , 1991 .

[18]  J. Sackett.  Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner , 1985, American Antiquity.

[19]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[20]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[21]  D. Jary,et al.  The HarperCollins dictionary of sociology , 1991 .

[22]  D. Smith.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature , 1981 .

[23]  Ivan Gaskell.  The Art of Describing. Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century , 1984 .

[24]  W A LONGACRE,et al.  Archeology as Anthropology: A Case Study , 1964, Science.

[25]  James N. Hill.  Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social Organization in the American Southwest , 1971 .

[26]  M. Iversen.  Patterns of Intention. On the Historical Explanation of Pictures , 1986 .

[27]  Judy Sterner.  Who is signalling whom? Ceramic style, ethnicity and taphonomy among the Sirak Bulahay , 1989, Antiquity.

[28]  James Sackett.  The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model , 1977, American Antiquity.

[29]  Lewis R. Binford,et al.  Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture Process , 1965, American Antiquity.

[30]  P. Wiessner.  Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points , 1983, American Antiquity.

[31]  C. Orton.  ‘Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape’: Essays on British and Irish Pottery for Ian Longworth. Edited by I. Kinnes and G. Varndell , 1997 .

[32]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[33]  Gordon Graham,et al.  On Human Conduct. , 1975 .

[34]  Anna O. Shepard,et al.  Ceramics for the archaeologist , 1958 .