Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test

Background: The functional performance of currently available body-powered prostheses is unknown. Objective: The goal of this study was to objectively assess and compare the functional performance of three commonly used body-powered upper limb terminal devices. Study design: Experimental trial. Methods: A total of 21 able-bodied subjects (n = 21, age = 22 ± 2) tested three different terminal devices: TRS voluntary closing Hook Grip 2S, Otto Bock voluntary opening hand and Hosmer Model 5XA hook, using a prosthesis simulator. All subjects used each terminal device nine times in two functional tests: the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Box and Blocks Test. Results: Significant differences were found between the different terminal devices and their scores on the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Box and Blocks Test. The Hosmer hook scored best in both tests. The TRS Hook Grip 2S scored second best. The Otto Bock hand showed the lowest scores. Conclusion: This study is a first step in the comparison of functional performances of body-powered prostheses. The data can be used as a reference value, to assess the performance of a terminal device or an amputee. Clinical relevance The measured scores enable the comparison of the performance of a prosthesis user and his or her terminal device relative to standard scores.

[1]  L. Kruger,et al.  Myoelectric and Body‐Powered Prostheses , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  I. Dudkiewicz,et al.  Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Semra Topuz,et al.  Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees. , 2012, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[4]  Bob Radocy Voluntary Closing Control : A Successful New Design Approach to an Old Concept , 2009 .

[5]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .

[7]  Peter J Kyberd The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  C. Jang,et al.  A Survey on Activities of Daily Living and Occupations of Upper Extremity Amputees , 2011, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  Peter S. Lum,et al.  Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  S. Spaulding,et al.  Jebsen Hand Function Test: performance of the uninvolved hand in hemiplegia and of right-handed, right and left hemiplegic persons. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  C. Sollerman,et al.  Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[16]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Robin C Crandall,et al.  Pediatric Unilateral Below-Elbow Amputees: Retrospective Analysis of 34 Patients Given Multiple Prosthetic Options , 2002, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  The i-LIMB Hand and the DMC Plus Hand Compared: A Case Report , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.