Talking about quantities in space: Vague quantifiers, context and similarity

Abstract In this paper we examine how vague quantifiers, such as few, several, lots of, map onto non-linguistic number systems. In particular our focus is to examine how judgements about vague quantifiers are affected by the presence of objects in visual scenes other than those being referred to. An experiment is presented that manipulated the number of objects in a visual scene (men playing golf; the ‘focus’ objects) together with the number of other objects in those scenes and their similarity — in terms of form (women or crocodiles) and function (playing golf, not playing golf) — to the focus objects. We show that the number of other objects in a scene impacts upon quantifiers judgements even when those objects are in a different category to the focus objects. We discuss the results in terms of the mapping between the large approximate number (estimation) system and language.

[1]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Denials as controllers of negative quantifier focus. , 2001 .

[2]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The Meaning of ‘Most’: Semantics, Numerosity and Psychology , 2009 .

[3]  David Barner,et al.  Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[5]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Context and the interpretation of quantifiers of frequency , 1987 .

[6]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  CONTROL CHART FOR LINGUISTIC VARIABLES : A METHOD BASED ON THE USE OF LINGUISTIC QUANTIFIERS , 1999 .

[7]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  The role of context and functionality in the interpretation of quantifiers , 2000 .

[9]  P. Gordon.  Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[10]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[11]  Lynn Richards,et al.  Grounding language in perception: A connectionist model of spatial terms and vegue quantifiers , 2005 .

[12]  Christopher C. Cummins,et al.  Scalar quantifiers: Logic, acquisition, and processing , 2010 .

[13]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .

[14]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Numbers and Quantifiers , 2006 .

[15]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Fuzzy quantifiers as an explanation of set inclusion performance , 1984 .

[16]  A. Sanford,et al.  Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[17]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  How much is 'quite a bit'? Mapping between numerical values and vague quantifiers , 1994 .

[19]  Clinton I. Chase,et al.  Often is where you find it. , 1969 .

[20]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Language as a Cognitive Technology: English-Speakers Match Like Pirahã When You Don't Let Them Count , 2008 .

[21]  Christoph Schwarze,et al.  Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language , 1983 .

[22]  Buell E. Goocher.  Effects of attitude and experience on the selection of frequency adverbs , 1965 .

[23]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Spatial Prepositions and Vague Quantifiers: Implementing the Functional Geometric Framework , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[24]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  J. Piaget,et al.  The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .

[26]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  The development of language and abstract concepts: the case of natural number. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount. , 1974 .

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[29]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Grounding Natural Language Quantifiers in Visual Attention , 2005 .

[30]  J. Piaget,et al.  La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires : classifications et sériations , 1959 .

[31]  P. Pollard,et al.  The effect of set size on the interpretation of quantifiers used in rating scales. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Hans Hörmann.  The Calculating Listener, or: How Many are einige, mehrere and ein paar (Some, Several, and a Few)? , 1983 .

[33]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Marc D Hauser,et al.  Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton–top tamarins , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Anna Maria Di Sciullo,et al.  Natural Language Understanding , 2009, SoMeT.

[36]  Daniel Casasanto.  Crying "Whorf" , 2005, Science.

[37]  V F Reyna,et al.  The language of possibility and probability: Effects of negation on meaning , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Multicriteria decision making using fuzzy quantifiers , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr).

[39]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate. , 2009, Child development perspectives.

[40]  Jean-Pierre Corriveau,et al.  A Pragmatic Treatment of Quantification in Natural Language , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[41]  Earl Cox,et al.  Fuzzy logic and the measures of certainty in eCommerce expert systems , 2001 .

[42]  Hiyan Alshawi,et al.  Resolving Quasi Logical Forms , 1990, CL.

[43]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[44]  Janusz Kacprzyk.  Mining sales data at a computer retailer via fuzzy-logic-based linguistic summaries , 1999, ICONIP'99. ANZIIS'99 & ANNES'99 & ACNN'99. 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX378).

[45]  Justin Halberda,et al.  The Development of “Most” Comprehension and Its Potential Dependence on Counting Ability in Preschoolers , 2008 .

[46]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  Context-dependent interpretations of linguistic terms in fuzzy relational databases , 1995, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering.