Compressed sensing of EEG using a random sampling ADC in 90nm CMOS

Wireless physiological sensors are often limited by energy consumption of the hardware. Power consumption is typically related to the amount of data being transmitted, conventionally the Nyquist rate which is twice the bandwidth of the signal. However, if the signals are sparse in a known basis, compressed sensing facilitates accurate reconstruction of data when sampled below the Nyquist rate. Thus, power consumption at the sensor node could be improved, which would allow long-term use of wireless physiological sensors. We have implemented a random sampling based compressed analog to information converter (AIC) in 90nm CMOS technology. Sufficiently sparse signals were reconstructed using the ℓ1-minimization algorithm. Here we present experimental results that demonstrate reconstruction of non-sparse signals, in this case EEG, by using an ℓ1, 2 regularization algorithm exploiting group sparsity. These results demonstrate the performance achievable by physical compressed sensing AIC systems for brain computer interface applications.

[1]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Group sparse optimization by alternating direction method , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[4]  S. Kirolos,et al.  Random Sampling for Analog-to-Information Conversion of Wideband Signals , 2006, 2006 IEEE Dallas/CAS Workshop on Design, Applications, Integration and Software.

[5]  Sameer R. Sonkusale,et al.  A Compressed Sensing Analog-to-Information Converter With Edge-Triggered SAR ADC Core , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[6]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  D.J. Brady,et al.  Compression at the Physical Interface , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  D. Hammond,et al.  Neurofeedback Treatment of Depression and Anxiety , 2005 .

[10]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Low Energy Wireless Body-Area Networks for Fetal ECG Telemonitoring via the Framework of Block Sparse Bayesian Learning , 2012, ArXiv.

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[12]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[13]  Daibashish Gangopadhyay,et al.  System considerations for the compressive sampling of EEG and ECoG bio-signals , 2011, 2011 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[14]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  From Theory to Practice: Sub-Nyquist Sampling of Sparse Wideband Analog Signals , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[15]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Esther Rodríguez-Villegas,et al.  Compressive sensing scalp EEG signals: implementations and practical performance , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.