Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil

Abstract This paper investigated barriers for the design and implementation of Urban Mobility Plans in small and medium-sized cities in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. To achieve this objective an exploratory survey was carried out with specialists involved in the urban planning processes of such cities. A total of 22 barriers were listed, and, using the Keiser criterion, these barriers were grouped into seven factors: (1) resources availability; (2) practical and technological; (3) city characteristics; (4) budget constrains; (5) social and cultural; (6) organizational; and (7) lack of infrastructure for sustainable vehicles; a grouping that, in general, was similar to those found in the literature. The first main barrier encountered in the municipalities analyzed were difficulties in finding mobility solutions that adequately meet all stakeholders’ needs, followed by budget constraints for implementing actions toward more sustainable transport modes. Even though the complexity of the actors involved is seen as one of the main barriers to urban planning, it is still necessary to effectively involve the population in the decision-making process, so that all needs are considered, and consensual solutions are reached. Through the Spearman correlation method, other barriers closely associated with the first main barrier were reconciling the mobility needs of the population with the already existing infrastructure and preference for motor vehicles. For the second main barrier, other closely correlated variables were insufficient data collection for the preparation of urban mobility plans and lack of qualified workforce within municipal agencies to both elaborate and implement the actions contained in the plans. These correlations suggest that a deficient budget hinders the development of sustainable urban mobility in several stages of the process, including the diagnosis phase (data collection).

[1]  I. Ugulu Development and validation of an instrument for assessing attitudes of high school students about recycling , 2015 .

[2]  Simon Shepherd,et al.  The Principles of Integration in Urban Transport Strategies , 2006 .

[3]  Ian Williamson,et al.  Developing a common spatial data infrastructure between State and Local Government--an Australian case study , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Márcia Helena Macêdo,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Mobility Conditions in Selected Cities of the Five Brazilian Regions , 2015 .

[5]  Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki,et al.  AN EVALUATION TO IDENTIFY THE BARRIERS TO THE FEASIBILITY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLANS: FIVE DECADES OF EXPERIENCE IN URBAN PLANNING IN IRAN , 2014, Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering.

[7]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review , 2017 .

[8]  Masanobu Kii,et al.  Looking at sustainable urban mobility through a cross-assessment model within the framework of land-use and transport integration , 2012 .

[9]  Clodoveu A. Davis,et al.  Main stumbling blocks for a good traffic accident database system - evidences from Brazil , 2015 .

[10]  H. Runhaar,et al.  Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[11]  K. Høyer,et al.  Sustainable mobility: the concept and its implications , 1999 .

[12]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[13]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[14]  Alexandre de Ávila Gomide,et al.  A mobilidade urbana: uma agenda inconclusa ou o retorno daquilo que não foi , 2013 .

[15]  Gerardo Marletto,et al.  A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test , 2012 .

[16]  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Participatory quantitative health impact assessment of urban and transport planning in cities: A review and research needs. , 2017, Environment international.

[17]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated , 2012 .

[18]  P. Wieringa,et al.  Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  Peter Jones,et al.  The evolution of urban mobility: The interplay of academic and policy perspectives , 2014 .

[20]  Angela Hull,et al.  Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities , 2008 .

[21]  Michele Biasutti,et al.  A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale , 2017 .

[22]  Martin Forsey Education in a mobile modernity , 2017 .

[23]  Angela Hull,et al.  Integrated transport planning in the UK: From concept to reality , 2005 .

[24]  A. Fernandes,et al.  A criação de municípios e a formalização de regiões metropolitanas: os desafios da coordenação federativa , 2015 .

[25]  S. Leitão,et al.  O plano de mobilidade urbana e o futuro das cidades , 2013 .

[26]  L. Bertolini,et al.  Urban Development without more Mobility by Car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a Multimodal Urban Region , 2003 .

[28]  Y. Baruch Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[29]  N. Morrison,et al.  High mountains and the faraway emperor: Overcoming barriers to citizen participation in China’s urban planning practices , 2016 .

[30]  Constantinos Antoniou,et al.  Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility , 2012, European Transport Research Review.

[31]  Sunho Jung,et al.  Exploratory factor analysis for small samples , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[32]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Assessing human and environmental pressures of global land-use change 2000–2010 , 2019, Global Sustainability.

[33]  David Banister,et al.  Barriers to the Implementation of Urban Sustainability , 1998 .

[34]  Anthony D. May,et al.  Encouraging good practice in the development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans , 2015 .

[35]  S. Sangle Critical success factors for corporate social responsibility: a public sector perspective , 2009 .

[36]  Maria Vittoria Corazza,et al.  A European vision for more environmentally friendly buses , 2016 .

[37]  M. Amorim,et al.  Assessment of Urban Heat Islands in Small- and Mid-Sized Cities in Brazil , 2017 .

[38]  J. Viegas Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility , 2001 .

[39]  Francesco Pinna,et al.  Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities , 2017 .

[40]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[41]  Jonathan Corcoran,et al.  How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing , 2016 .

[42]  Fernando Rodrigues Lima Briefing: Municipal engineering in Brazil , 2014 .

[43]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[44]  Maria Vittoria Corazza,et al.  A new generation of buses to support more sustainable urban transport policies: A path towards "greener" awareness among bus stakeholders in Europe , 2016 .

[45]  Stuart White,et al.  Making better choices: a systematic comparison of adversarial and collaborative approaches to the transport policy process , 2012 .

[46]  Anthony May,et al.  Appropriate national policy frameworks for sustainable urban mobility plans , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[47]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  A ‘sustainability window’ of urban form , 2016 .