Development of chocolate dairy dessert with addition of prebiotics and replacement of sucrose with different high-intensity sweeteners.

The aims of this study were (1) to optimize the formulation of a prebiotic chocolate dairy dessert and assess the extent to which sensory properties were affected by adding different concentrations of prebiotics (inulin and fructooligosaccharides) combined with different levels of xanthan and guar gums, and (2) to analyze the ideal and relative sweetness of prebiotic chocolate milk dessert sweetened with different artificial and natural sweeteners. Acceptability was evaluated by 100 consumers using a 9-cm hedonic scale, and the level of sample creaminess was evaluated using a 9-point just-about-right (JAR) scale. Data were subjected to a multivariate regression analysis and fitted to a model provided by response surface methodology. The optimal concentrations were 7.5% (wt/wt) prebiotic and 0.20% (wt/wt) gum (guar and xanthan, in a 2:1 ratio). The ideal sweetness analysis revealed that the ideal concentration of sucrose was 8.13%. The relative sweetness analysis showed that Neotame (NutraSweet Corp., Chicago, IL) had the highest sweetening power compared with the prebiotic chocolate dairy dessert containing 8% sucrose, followed by sucralose, aspartame, and stevia. The study of sweetness in this product is important because consumers desire healthier functional products with no added sugar.

[1]  C. Delattre,et al.  An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field , 2013 .

[2]  E. Costell,et al.  Flow behaviour of inulin-enriched dairy desserts: influence of inulin average chain length , 2009 .

[3]  M. McDaniel,et al.  FORMULATING A NEW PASSION FRUIT JUICE BEVERAGE WITH DIFFERENT SWEETENER SYSTEMS , 2009 .

[4]  Daniel Granato,et al.  Sensory Analysis: Relevance for Prebiotic, Probiotic, and Synbiotic Product Development. , 2010, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[5]  E. Çapanoğlu,et al.  Frozen yogurt with added inulin and isomalt. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  E. Esmerino,et al.  The influence of sweeteners in probiotic Petit Suisse cheese in concentrations equivalent to that of sucrose. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  R. Cadena,et al.  Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar , 2012 .

[8]  V. R. Souza,et al.  Analysis of various sweeteners in petit suisse cheese: determination of the ideal and equivalent sweetness , 2011 .

[9]  G. Ares,et al.  CONSUMERS' CREAMINESS CONCEPT PERCEPTION: A CROSS‐CULTURAL STUDY IN THREE SPANISH‐SPEAKING COUNTRIES , 2011 .

[10]  R. Cadena,et al.  Time–intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream , 2011 .

[11]  A. Trujillo,et al.  Influence of fat replacement by inulin on rheological properties, kinetics of rennet milk coagulation, and syneresis of milk gels. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  A. Tárrega,et al.  Optimising acceptability of new prebiotic low-fat milk beverages. , 2010 .

[13]  COMPARISON OF ATTRIBUTE LIKING AND JAR SCALES TO EVALUATE THE ADEQUACY OF SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF MILK DESSERTS , 2009 .

[14]  O. Thas,et al.  Interactions between κ-carrageenan, milk proteins and modified starch in sterilized dairy desserts , 2006 .

[15]  M. Drake,et al.  Salty taste in dairy foods: can we reduce the salt? , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception , 2010 .

[17]  S. G. Wiet,et al.  Sensory Characteristics of Sucralose and other High Intensity Sweeteners , 1992 .

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  Z. Vickers SENSORY SPECIFIC SATIETY IN LEMONADE USING A JUST RIGHT SCALE FOR SWEETNESS , 1988 .

[20]  T. C. Pimentel,et al.  Short communication: Influence of long-chain inulin and Lactobacillus paracasei subspecies paracasei on the sensory profile and acceptance of a traditional yogurt. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  G. Hough,et al.  COMPARING 3‐POINT VERSUS 9‐POINT JUST‐ABOUT‐RIGHT SCALES FOR DETERMINING THE OPTIMUM CONCENTRATION OF SWEETNESS IN A BEVERAGE , 2010 .

[22]  Gail Vance Civille,et al.  Sensory evaluation in quality control , 1992 .

[23]  István Siró,et al.  Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—A review , 2008, Appetite.

[24]  Helena Maria André Bolini,et al.  Ultra-flash Profile And Projective Mapping For Describing Sensory Attributes Of Prebiotic Mortadellas , 2013 .

[25]  A. Tárrega,et al.  Inulin blend as prebiotic and fat replacer in dairy desserts: optimization by response surface methodology. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  H. Bolini,et al.  Prebiotic gluten-free bread: Sensory profiling and drivers of liking , 2014 .

[27]  V. R. Souza,et al.  Analysis of various sweeteners in low‐sugar mixed fruit jam: equivalent sweetness, time‐intensity analysis and acceptance test , 2013 .

[28]  J. Tinti,et al.  Neotame: discovery, properties, utility , 2000 .

[29]  R. Cadena,et al.  Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: sensory profiling and external preference mapping. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  A. G. Cruz,et al.  Gluten-free bread: multiple time–intensity analysis, physical characterisation and acceptance test , 2013 .

[31]  R. N. Cavalcanti,et al.  Developing a prebiotic yogurt: Rheological, physico-chemical and microbiological aspects and adequacy of survival analysis methodology , 2013 .

[32]  M. Rodrigues,et al.  Optimization of synbiotic fermented food from hydrosoluble soy extract applying experimental design and sensory analysis techniques. , 2010 .

[33]  H. Bolini,et al.  Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness , 2007 .

[34]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  THE JUST‐ABOUT‐RIGHT INTENSITY SCALE: FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES AND RELATION TO HEDONICS , 2007 .

[35]  K. Kanmatsuse,et al.  [Functional food]. , 2000, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[36]  Ian Wakeling,et al.  Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested , 1995 .

[37]  R. N. Cavalcanti,et al.  Processing optimization of probiotic yogurt containing glucose oxidase using response surface methodology. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  G. Dubois,et al.  Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. , 2012, Annual review of food science and technology.

[39]  H. Bolini,et al.  DIFFERENT SWEETENERS IN BEVERAGES PREPARED WITH INSTANT AND ROASTED GROUND COFFEE: IDEAL AND EQUIVALENT SWEETNESS , 2010 .

[40]  G. Ares,et al.  EXPLORING AND EXPLAINING CREAMINESS PERCEPTION: CONSUMERS' UNDERLYING CONCEPTS , 2011 .

[41]  M. Drake,et al.  Sensory properties and drivers of liking for Greek yogurts. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.