Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013
暂无分享,去创建一个
David F. Albertini | Norbert Gleicher | D. Albertini | D. Barad | N. Gleicher | V. Kushnir | Vitaly A. Kushnir | David H. Barad | Sarah K. Darmon | S. Darmon
[1] D. Albertini,et al. IVF outcomes in average- and poor-prognosis infertile women according to the number of embryos transferred. , 2016, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[2] M. Gissler,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. , 2016, Human reproduction.
[3] G D Adamson,et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. , 2016, Human reproduction.
[4] D. Albertini,et al. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.
[5] D. Albertini,et al. Effect of Embryo Banking on U.S. National Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rates , 2016, PloS one.
[6] J. Crosby,et al. Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: The Latin American Registry, 2013. , 2016, JBRA assisted reproduction.
[7] A. Chavez-Badiola,et al. Minimal Stimulation IVF vs Conventional IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016 .
[8] Human Fertilisation,et al. Fertility Treatment in 2014: Trends and Figures , 2016 .
[9] F. Hirahara,et al. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.
[10] V. Goossens,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. , 2016, Human reproduction.
[11] D. Albertini,et al. Live-birth rates in very poor prognosis patients, who are defined as poor responders under the Bologna criteria, with nonelective single embryo, two-embryo, and three or more embryos transferred. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.
[12] A. Chughtai,et al. Risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer: a large population study using contemporary registry data from Australia and New Zealand. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.
[13] B. Luke,et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). , 2015, Fertility and sterility.
[14] Y. Choi,et al. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2010 , 2015, Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine.
[15] E. Adashi,et al. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[16] D. Barad,et al. Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection? , 2015, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.
[17] S. Daneshmand,et al. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.
[18] D. Kissin,et al. Number of Embryos Transferred After In Vitro Fertilization and Good Perinatal Outcome , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[19] A. Laenen,et al. The impact of legally restricted embryo transfer and reimbursement policy on cumulative delivery rate after treatment with assisted reproduction technology. , 2014, Human reproduction.
[20] S. Roh,et al. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2009 , 2013, Obstetrics & gynecology science.
[21] E. Lesaffre,et al. The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: a case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy. , 2013, Human reproduction.
[22] W. Schoolcraft,et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.
[23] D. Barad,et al. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.
[24] Osamu Ishihara,et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. , 2013, Human reproduction.
[25] N. Gleicher,et al. Mistaken advocacy against twin pregnancies following IVF , 2013, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[26] V. Goossens,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE , 2012 .
[27] D. Bodri,et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort , 2012, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.
[28] S. Dyer,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in South Africa: first results generated from the South African Register of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. , 2012, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.
[29] F. Bissonnette,et al. Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec. , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[30] N. Gleicher. Eliminating multiple pregnancies: an appropriate target for government intervention? , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[31] D. Barad,et al. Low-intensity IVF: real progress? , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[32] S. Silber,et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation (mini-IVF) for IVF utilizing vitrification and cryopreserved embryo transfer. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[33] L. Nardo,et al. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.
[34] E. Sullivan,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2007 , 2009 .
[35] D. Barad,et al. Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.
[36] H. Tournaye,et al. Elective single embryo transfer , 2008 .
[37] S. Daya,et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.
[38] D. Barad,et al. Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.
[39] S. Daya,et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.
[40] D. Barad,et al. On the benefit of assisted reproduction techniques, a comparison of the USA and Europe. , 2006, Human reproduction.
[41] D. Barad,et al. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA. , 2006, Human reproduction.
[42] M. Keirse,et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies , 2004 .
[43] M Orava,et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. , 2001, Human reproduction.
[44] F. Olivennes. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART. Double trouble: yes a twin pregnancy is an adverse outcome. , 2000, Human reproduction.
[45] F. Kotsuji,et al. [The current status of assisted reproductive technology]. , 2000, Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica.
[46] Matheus Roque,et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.
[47] C. Farquhar,et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[48] O. Kato,et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a large-scale retrospective study. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[49] L. Gianaroli,et al. On the benefit of assisted reproduction techniques, a comparison of the USA and Europe. , 2006, Human reproduction.
[50] V. Maclachlan,et al. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. , 2004, Human reproduction.
[51] D. Goldhamer,et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology , 2003 .
[52] J. R. Scotti,et al. Available From , 1973 .