Space continuity constraint in dynamic Flex-Grid/SDM optical core networks: An evaluation with spatial and spectral super-channels

Abstract Space Division Multiplexing (SDM) appears as a promising solution to overcome the capacity limits of single-mode optical fibers. In Flex-Grid/SDM optical networks, nodes offering full interconnection between input/output fiber ports and spatial channels, typical SDM-Reconfigurable Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer (SDM-ROADM) referred to as independent switching with lane support (InS with LC support), require very complex and expensive node architectures. Alternative designs have been proposed to relax their requirements, such as those realizing Joint-switching (JoS) by switching one spectrum slice across all spatial channels at once. In this work, we evaluate the benefits of a cost-effective SDM-ROADM architecture that makes a trade-off between (i) performance in terms of network throughput and (ii) architectural complexity by forcing the Space Continuity Constraint (SCC) end-to-end, that is, along the connection physical path. The performance and architectural complexity of such a SDM-ROADM solution are compared in dynamic Flex-Grid/SDM scenarios against benchmark networks based on InS with LC support and JoS SDM-ROADMs, under both spatial and spectral super-channels. We quantify the network throughput when scaling the spatial multiplicity from 7 to 30 spatial channels, considering Multi-Fiber (MF) as well as Multi-Core Fiber (MCF) SDM solutions. The obtained results reveal that differences in terms of network throughput employing InS without LC support SDM-ROADMs is merely up to 14% lower than InS with LC support SDM-ROADMs, while the network CAPEX can be dramatically reduced by 86%. In contrast, networks employing InS without LC support SDM-ROADMs carry up to 40% higher throughput than JoS ones, whereas the network CAPEX can be raised up to 3×. This paper also analyses the spatial multiplicity impact on both network metrics (throughput and CAPEX).

[1]  Dan M. Marom,et al.  Switching solutions for WDM-SDM optical networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  Improving performance of spatially joint- switched space division multiplexing optical networks via spatial group sharing , 2017, IEEE\/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[3]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  Nyquist-WDM-Based Flexible Optical Networks: Exploring Physical Layer Design Parameters , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  T. Kawanishi,et al.  Space Division Multiplexed Transmission of 109-Tb/s Data Signals Using Homogeneous Seven-Core Fiber , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  Hideki Tode,et al.  Routing, spectrum and core assignment for space division multiplexing elastic optical networks , 2014, 2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks).

[6]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Comparison of CD(C) ROADM architectures for space division multiplexed networks , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[7]  R Nejabati,et al.  Fully-elastic multi-granular network with space/frequency/time switching using multi-core fibres and programmable optical nodes. , 2013, Optics express.

[8]  Francisco-Jose Martínez-Zaldívar,et al.  Book reviews [Three books reviewed] , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Liangjia Zong,et al.  Survey of photonic switching architectures and technologies in support of spatially and spectrally flexible optical networking [invited] , 2017, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[10]  Pablo Pavón-Mariño,et al.  Assessment of Flex-Grid/MCF Optical Networks with ROADM limited core switching capability , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM).

[11]  S. Spadaro,et al.  Evaluation of core-continuity-constrained ROADMs for flex-grid/MCF optical networks , 2017, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[12]  Dimitra Simeonidou,et al.  Routing, spectrum and core allocation in flexgrid SDM networks with multi-core fibers , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling.

[13]  Juan P. Fernández Palacios,et al.  Planning fixed to flexgrid gradual migration: drivers and open issues , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Naoya Wada,et al.  19-core MCF transmission system using EDFA with shared core pumping coupled via free-space optics. , 2014, Optics express.

[15]  Salvatore Spadaro,et al.  Capacity quantification of joint-switching-enabled flex-grid/SDM optical backbone networks , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[16]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of different SDM switching strategies in a network planning scenario , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[17]  Brandon Collings,et al.  New devices enabling software-defined optical networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  N. Wada,et al.  2.15 Pb/s transmission using a 22 core homogeneous single-mode multi-core fiber and wideband optical comb , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[19]  Jordi Perelló,et al.  Cost-effective spatial super-channel allocation in Flex-Grid/MCF optical core networks , 2018, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[20]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Impact of Spatial and Spectral Granularity on the Performance of SDM Networks Based on Spatial Superchannel Switching , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[21]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  Comparison of Spectral and Spatial Super-Channel Allocation Schemes for SDM Networks , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[22]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Cost and power consumption model for flexible super-channel transmission with all-optical sub-channel add/drop capability , 2015, 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[23]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Resource Allocation for Space-Division Multiplexing: Optical White Box Versus Optical Black Box Networking , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  H. Takara,et al.  Dense Space Division Multiplexed Transmission Over Multicore and Multimode Fiber for Long-haul Transport Systems , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[25]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Elastic optical networking: a new dawn for the optical layer? , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Jose A. Lazaro,et al.  Flex-grid/SDM backbone network design with inter-core XT-limited transmission reach , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[27]  M. Fishteyn,et al.  Joint Digital Signal Processing Receivers for Spatial Superchannels , 2012, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[28]  M. Koshiba,et al.  409-Tb/s + 409-Tb/s crosstalk suppressed bidirectional MCF transmission over 450 km using propagation-direction interleaving. , 2013, Optics express.

[29]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Making spatial multiplexing a reality , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[30]  B. Zhu,et al.  Spatial Superchannel Routing in a Two-Span ROADM System for Space Division Multiplexing , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[31]  Y. Miyamoto,et al.  High-density multicore fiber with heterogeneous core arrangement , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[32]  Hideki Tode,et al.  On-demand spectrum and core allocation for reducing crosstalk in multicore fibers in elastic optical networks , 2014, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[33]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Spatial multiplexing: The next frontier in network capacity scaling , 2013 .

[34]  L. Nelson,et al.  Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[35]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Spectrally and spatially flexible optical network planning and operations , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[36]  S. Tibuleac,et al.  N-degree ROADM architecture comparison: Broadcast-and-select versus route-and-select in 120 Gb/s DP-QPSK transmission systems , 2014, OFC 2014.