A refined model of sedimentary rock cover in the southeastern part of the Congo basin from GOCE gravity and vertical gravity gradient observations

Abstract We aim to interpret the vertical gravity and vertical gravity gradient of the GOCE-GRACE combined gravity model over the southeastern part of the Congo basin to refine the published model of sedimentary rock cover. We use the GOCO03S gravity model and evaluate its spherical harmonic representation at or near the Earth's surface. In this case, the gradiometry signals are enhanced as compared to the original measured GOCE gradients at satellite height and better emphasize the spatial pattern of sedimentary geology. To avoid aliasing, the omission error of the modelled gravity induced by the sedimentary rocks is adjusted to that of the GOCO03S gravity model. The mass-density Green's functions derived for the a priori structure of the sediments show a slightly greater sensitivity to the GOCO03S vertical gravity gradient than to the vertical gravity. Hence, the refinement of the sedimentary model is carried out for the vertical gravity gradient over the basin, such that a few anomalous values of the GOCO03S-derived vertical gravity gradient are adjusted by refining the model. We apply the 5-parameter Helmert's transformation, defined by 2 translations, 1 rotation and 2 scale parameters that are searched for by the steepest descent method. The refined sedimentary model is only slightly changed with respect to the original map, but it significantly improves the fit of the vertical gravity and vertical gravity gradient over the basin. However, there are still spatial features in the gravity and gradiometric data that remain unfitted by the refined model. These may be due to lateral density variation that is not contained in the model, a density contrast at the Moho discontinuity, lithospheric density stratifications or mantle convection. In a second step, the refined sedimentary model is used to find the vertical density stratification of sedimentary rocks. Although the gravity data can be interpreted by a constant sedimentary density, such a model does not correspond to the gravitational compaction of sedimentary rocks. Therefore, the density model is extended by including a linear increase in density with depth. Subsequent L 2 and L ∞ norm minimization procedures are applied to find the density parameters by adjusting both the vertical gravity and the vertical gravity gradient. We found that including the vertical gravity gradient in the interpretation of the GOCO03S-derived data reduces the non-uniqueness of the inverse gradiometric problem for density determination. The density structure of the sedimentary formations that provide the optimum predictions of the GOCO03S-derived gravity and vertical gradient of gravity consists of a surface density contrast with respect to surrounding rocks of 0.24–0.28 g/cm 3 and its decrease with depth of 0.05–0.25 g/cm 3 per 10 km. Moreover, the case where the sedimentary rocks are gravitationally completely compacted in the deepest parts of the basin is supported by L ∞ norm minimization. However, this minimization also allows a remaining density contrast at the deepest parts of the sedimentary basin of about 0.1 g/cm 3 .

[1]  W. Featherstone,et al.  Topographic/isostatic evaluation of newgeneration GOCE gravity field models , 2012 .

[2]  Z. Martinec Mass-density Green's functions for the gravitational gradient tensor at different heights , 2014 .

[3]  S. Fishwick,et al.  Structure and evolution of the intracratonic Congo Basin , 2010 .

[4]  S. Lebedev,et al.  Global shear speed structure of the upper mantle and transition zone , 2013 .

[5]  M. Gurnis,et al.  Instantaneous dynamics of the cratonic Congo basin , 2009 .

[6]  D. Delvaux,et al.  Structure and geological history of the Congo Basin: an integrated interpretation of gravity, magnetic and reflection seismic data , 2011 .

[7]  Z. Martinec The Density Contrast At the Mohorovičic̀ Discontinuity , 1994 .

[8]  Zdeněk Martinec Program to calculate the spectral harmonic expansion coefficients of the two scalar fields product , 1989 .

[9]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[10]  A. Jäggi,et al.  The new combined satellite only model GOCO03s , 2012 .

[11]  S. Fishwick,et al.  Towards a better understanding of African topography: a review of passive-source seismic studies of the African crust and upper mantle , 2011 .

[12]  M. Fuchs,et al.  GOCE gravity gradients versus global gravity field models , 2012 .

[13]  F. Lucazeau,et al.  A Proterozoic-rift origin for the structure and the evolution of the cratonic Congo basin , 2011 .

[14]  T. Gruber,et al.  Impact of GOCE Level 1b data reprocessing on GOCE-only and combined gravity field models , 2013, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica.

[15]  S. Buiter,et al.  Could the mantle have caused subsidence of the Congo Basin , 2012 .

[16]  M. Daly,et al.  Tectonic evolution of the Cuvette Centrale, Zaire , 1992, Journal of the Geological Society.

[17]  Alan Watt,et al.  3D Computer Graphics , 1993 .

[18]  M. Pasyanos,et al.  A top to bottom lithospheric study of Africa and Arabia , 2006 .

[19]  T. Hegna,et al.  Mesozoic sedimentary cover sequences of the Congo Basin in the Kasai region, Democratic Republic of Congo , 2015 .

[20]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[21]  Z. Martinec Program to calculate the least-squares estimates of the spherical harmonic expansion coefficients of an equally angular-gridded scalar field , 1991 .

[22]  The Phobos gravitational field modeled on the basis of its topography , 1989 .

[23]  J. Afonso,et al.  The structure and evolution of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary beneath the Atlantic-Mediterranean Transition Region , 2010 .

[24]  D. Varshalovich,et al.  Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum , 1988 .