Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes

Summary Experiments were carried out to assess the increase in yield potential of winter wheat in the U.K. due to variety improvement since the early years of this century. The effects of other genetic changes were minimized by applying fungicide to control eyespot and foliar diseases, and by using nets to prevent lodging. The experiments were carried out in 1978 at Cambridge. One, on soil of high fertility in Camp Field, received 104 kg N/ha and the other, on soil of lower fertility in Paternoster Field, received 38 kg N/ha. Twelve genotypes were tested. Eight were varieties which formed a chronological series beginning with Little Joss, introduced in 1908. The remaining genotypes were recently developed selections from the Plant Breeding Institute and a line bred by the French breeders, Benoist. The average yield of the 12 varieties and lines tested was 3·96 t/ha in Paternoster Field and 6·40 t/ha in Camp Field. In both fields the two highest yielding entries, Hobbit and the advanced breeding line 989/10, outyielded Little Joss by close to 40%. Benoist 10483 was the only entry for which the percentage yield advantage depended on high soil fertility. The newer, high yielding, varieties were shorter and reached anthesis earlier than the older varieties. They had lower stem weights/m2 than the older varieties but similar maximum leaf area indices and leaf weights/m2. Within each experiment the total dry-matter production of the varieties was similar, the increase in grain yield due to variety improvement being associated mainly with greater harvest index (ratio of grain yield to grain + straw yield). It is argued that by a continuation of the trend towards reduced stem length, with no change in above-ground biomass, breeders may be able to increase harvest index, from the present value of about 50% to about 60%, achieving a genetic gain in yield of some 25%. As the limit to harvest index is approached, genetic gain in yield will depend on detecting and exploiting genetic variation in biomass production.

[1]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  R. B. Austin,et al.  The Fate of the Dry Matter, Carbohydrates and 14C Lost from the Leaves and Stems of Wheat during Grain Filling , 1977 .

[3]  J. Bingham,et al.  The effects of a granular nitrogen fertilizer and a foliar spray of urea on the yield and bread-making quality of ten winter wheats , 1976, Journal of Agricultural Sciences.

[4]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Some effects of leaf posture on photosynthesis and yield in wheat , 1976 .

[5]  D. J. C. Friend,et al.  EAR LENGTH AND SPIKELET NUMBER OF WHEAT GROWN AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES AND LIGHT INTENSITIES , 1965 .

[6]  H. K. Jain,et al.  Dwarfing genes and breeding for yield in bread wheat , 1976 .

[7]  J. Patrick Distribution of Assimilate During Stem Elongation in Wheat , 1972 .

[8]  L. Evans,et al.  The contribution of stem reserves to grain development in a range of wheat cultivars of different height , 1971 .

[9]  J. Syme A high-yielding Mexican semi-dwarf wheat and the relationship of yield to harvest index and other varietal characteristics. , 1970 .

[10]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. , 1970 .

[11]  J. Bingham,et al.  physiological determinants of grain yield in cereals , 1969 .

[12]  H. Rawson,et al.  TRANSLOCATION AND REMOBILIZATION OF $sup 14$C ASSIMILATED AT DIFFERENT STAGES BY EACH LEAF OF THE WHEAT PLANT. , 1969 .

[13]  D. Watson,et al.  Analysis of Growth and Yield of Winter and Spring Wheats , 1963 .