Veinlite Transillumination in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Therapeutic Interventional Trial

Objectives: We hypothesized that transillumination would increase peripheral intravenous (IV) insertion success rates in pediatric emergency department patients. Primary outcome was success in first attempt, and secondary outcome was success within 2 attempts. Methods: We evaluated IV insertion by pediatric emergency department physicians and nurses using the Veinlite (TransLite, Sugar Land, Tex). Patients who required nonemergent IV insertion were enrolled if younger than 3 years or aged 3 to 21 years with a history of difficult access. Participants were randomly assigned to transillumination or nontransillumination. Analyses were performed using a mixed-effects logistic regression model adjusting for provider effect. Results: We evaluated 240 patients. After adjusting for significant covariates (safety catheter [P = 0.008], visibility [P = 0.01], and palpability [P = 0.03]) and controlling for provider effect, IV placement was more likely successful in first attempt in transilluminated patients (P = 0.03; odds ratio, 2.1 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.9]). After adjusting for significant covariates (safety catheter [P < 0.001], location [P = 0.005], and palpability [P = 0.05]) and controlling for provider effect, IV placement was more likely successful within 2 attempts in transilluminated patients (P = 0.01; odds ratio, 3.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-8.9]). Intracluster correlation for random effect of provider was 10% in first attempt and 16% within 2 attempts. Conclusions: After adjusting for multiple significant covariates and controlling for random effect of provider, our results indicated a benefit in the use of Veinlite transillumination for IV insertion in first attempt and within 2 attempts. This technique seemed to facilitate nonemergent IV placement in pediatric patients compared with standard practice.

[1]  J. Kuint,et al.  Transillumination of the palm for venipuncture in infants , 2001, Pediatric emergency care.

[2]  R. Pearse,et al.  Percutaneous catheterisation of the radial artery in newborn babies using transillumination. , 1978, Archives of disease in childhood.

[3]  M. Gauderer Vascular access techniques and devices in the pediatric patient. , 1992, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[4]  L. Kuhns,et al.  Intense transillumination for infant venipuncture. , 1975, Radiology.

[5]  L. Kuhns,et al.  Light filtration during transillumination of the neonate: a method to reduce heat buildup in the skin. , 1977, Pediatrics.

[6]  R. McArtor,et al.  Iatrogenic second-degree burn caused by a transilluminator. , 1979, Pediatrics.

[7]  A. M. Frey,et al.  Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. , 1998, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[8]  Robert Brown,et al.  Introduction of a “Safety” Intravenous Catheter for Use in an Emergency Department: A Pediatric Hospital's Experience , 1992, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  F. Moler,et al.  Percutaneous central venous catheterization in a pediatric intensive care unit: a survival analysis of complications. , 1990, Critical care medicine.

[10]  W. P. Arnold,et al.  Fiberoptic transillumination for intravenous cannulation under general anesthesia. , 1981, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  M. Dinner Transillumination to facilitate venipuncture in children. , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  J. Mateer,et al.  Intraosseous infusion: an alternative route of pediatric intravascular access. , 1985, Annals of emergency medicine.

[13]  L. Kuhns,et al.  Letter: A caution about using photoillumination devices. , 1976, Pediatrics.

[14]  Frey Am Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. , 1998 .

[15]  M. Statter Peripheral and central venous access. , 1992, Seminars in pediatric surgery.