Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[4]  G. Fauconnier.  Polarity and the Scale Principle , 1975 .

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[7]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Nathan Salmon,et al.  Reflexivity , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[9]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location , 1986 .

[10]  H. Cairns,et al.  Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Marcia C. Linebarger,et al.  Negative polarity and grammatical representation , 1987 .

[12]  P. Sells.  Aspects of logophoricity , 1987 .

[13]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[14]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Anne Zribi-Hertz.  Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse , 1989 .

[16]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Jackendoff.  MME. Tussaud meets the binding theory , 1992 .

[18]  C. Pollard.  Anhaphors in English and the scope of binding theory , 1992 .

[19]  J. Kounios,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[21]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[22]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  The Semantics and Pragmatics of Weak and Strong Polarity Items in Assertions , 1994 .

[24]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[25]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[26]  K. Paterson,et al.  Attentional focusing with quantifiers in production and comprehension , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[27]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[28]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[29]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Reading the WordsHer, His, Him:Implications for Parsing Principles Based on Frequency and on Structure , 1997 .

[30]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Surface structure and interpretation , 1996, Linguistic inquiry.

[32]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[33]  H. Coslett,et al.  ANALYZING SEMANTIC PROCESSING USING EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS , 1998 .

[34]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency , 2000 .

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[36]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.

[37]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[39]  Tony Harris,et al.  An ERP Investigation of Binding and Coreference , 2000, Brain and Language.

[40]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Denials as controllers of negative quantifier focus. , 2001 .

[41]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[44]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  I. Noveck,et al.  Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study , 2003, Brain and Language.

[46]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[47]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[49]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing☆ , 2003 .

[51]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs , 2004, Brain and Language.

[52]  M. Israel.  The Pragmatics of Polarity , 2004 .

[53]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  The handbook of pragmatics , 2004 .

[54]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[56]  Marga Reis,et al.  Linguistic evidence : empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives , 2005 .

[57]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing Negative Polarity Items: When Negation Comes Through the Backdoor , 2005 .

[59]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[60]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Testing the strength of the spurious licensing effect for negative polarity items , 2006 .

[61]  P. Gordon,et al.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  Peter beim Graben,et al.  Diagnosis and repair of negative polarity constructions in the light of symbolic resonance analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[63]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrase , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Only, Emotive Factive Verbs, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency , 2006 .

[65]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[66]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[67]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  C. Phillips.  The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena , 2007 .

[69]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora , 2007 .

[70]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[71]  Processing negative polarity items: a Magnetoencephalography study , 2008 .

[72]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .