A new analysis method for structural failure evaluation

Abstract There are many possible approaches for structural failure evaluation which uses different nonlinear structural analysis methods. For computer implementation purposes, some important differences between them are the results precision, the amount of computer memory needed and computer processing time. For solving practical problems, a compromise between accuracy and computational effort is needed. In this work, a new method is presented for linear and nonlinear structural analysis. The new developed method was named Fibre Contact Element Method (FCEM). In the proposed method, structures are divided in a mesh of several small rectangular block elements (neighbour blocks do not need to be aligned). These elements are divided in several micro fibre elements. Fibres belonging to neighbour blocks are connected between contact points. Two degrees of freedom are considered per contact point and three degrees of freedom are considered for each block (in a 2D model). The elemental block stiffness matrix is obtained from the assembly of fibre stiffness matrix. A static matrix condensation is preformed to reduce the block stiffness matrix dimension. The elasticity and plasticity is concentrated on each fibre element. Global nonlinear response can result from flexural or from shear fibre cracking or yielding. In this work, comparisons between numerical and analytical results are presented. The new method seems to be accurate and fast enough for solving practical problems, namely for seismic damage assessment. Results seem to demonstrate that FCEM can be a valid option for using in structural failure evaluation.

[1]  Yuichi Sato,et al.  Discrete‐like crack simulation by smeared crack‐based FEM for reinforced concrete , 2007 .

[2]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[3]  Hamed Salem,et al.  Toward an economic design of reinforced concrete structures against progressive collapse , 2011 .

[4]  Steen Krenk,et al.  A dual orthogonality procedure for non-linear finite element equations , 1995 .

[5]  L. J. Sluys,et al.  Non-homogeneous displacement jumps in strong embedded discontinuities , 2003 .

[6]  Jorge Alfaiate,et al.  A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF NON-PRESCRIBED CRACK PROPAGATION IN CONCRETE , 1997 .

[7]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings , 2009 .

[8]  Gouri Dhatt,et al.  Incremental displacement algorithms for nonlinear problems , 1979 .

[9]  N. Monteiro Azevedo,et al.  Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Mehrdad Sasani,et al.  Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns , 2008 .

[11]  Peter Linde,et al.  Numerical Modelling and Capacity Design of Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Walls , 1993 .

[12]  Željana Nikolić,et al.  A combined finite-discrete element analysis of dry stone masonry structures , 2013 .

[13]  George E. Blandford,et al.  Work-increment-control method for non-linear analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Paola Ceresa,et al.  Flexure-Shear Fiber Beam-Column Elements for Modeling Frame Structures Under Seismic Loading — State of the Art , 2007 .

[15]  E. Ramm,et al.  On the application of a discrete model to the fracture process of cohesive granular materials , 2002 .

[16]  M. Vinches,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of a stone masonry bridge assessed using an implicit discrete element method , 2013 .

[17]  E. Garboczi,et al.  FRACTURE SIMULATIONS OF CONCRETE USING LATTICE MODELS : COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS , 1997 .

[18]  Kimiro Meguro,et al.  Applied Element Simulation of RC Structures under Cyclic Loading , 2001 .

[19]  René de Borst,et al.  Discrete vs smeared crack models for concrete fracture: bridging the gap , 2004 .