A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays

In this paper we investigate human binocular depth perception on 3D electronic display technologies. Our study is motivated by the increasing use of 3D displays in applications, including geo-science and medicine, where critical decisions are made using fine binocular depth judgements. We predict subject performance for a depth judgement task using published specifications for seven different 3D displays. A repeated measures, within subjects experimental design is used to determine the effect that display and binocular disparity have on subject scores in the task. We find that there is reliable variation in participant performance with display and disparity, however this variation is not always consistent with our predictions from the display specifications. We also present subjective results that suggest user preference for a 3D display is not always a reliable guide to their ability to perform the task. We conclude that care must be taken in selecting 3D display systems for tasks that critically rely on human depth judgement.

[1]  Graham John Woodgate,et al.  3D Display Systems Hardware Research at Sharp Laboratories of Europe : an update , 1999 .

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[3]  Shih-Ching Yeh,et al.  Effects of gender, application, experience, and constraints on interaction performance using autostereoscopic displays , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Jesse B. Eichenlaub.  Developments in autosterioscopic technology at Dimension Technologies Inc. , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Graham R Jones,et al.  Controlling perceived depth in stereoscopic images , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Voicu Popescu,et al.  Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Jesse B. Eichenlaub.  Further advances in autostereoscopic technology at Dimension Technologies Inc. , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Armin Schwerdtner,et al.  Dresden 3D display (D4D) , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Limits of Fusion and Depth Judgment in Stereoscopic Color Displays , 1990, Human factors.

[10]  Graham John Woodgate,et al.  Performance of a flat-panel display system convertible between 2D and autostereoscopic 3D modes , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Leslie S. Mair,et al.  Stereoscopic display using a 1.2-m diameter stretchable membrane mirror , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Issues in the design of studies to test the effectiveness of stereo imaging , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  Joshua M. Cobb.  Autostereoscopic desktop display: an evolution of technology , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Derek H. Fender,et al.  Human Engineering in Stereoscopic Viewing Devices , 1993, Advances in Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays , 2006, AVI '06.

[16]  Nicolas S. Holliman,et al.  Mapping perceived depth to regions of interest in stereoscopic images , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Scott S. Fisher,et al.  Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIV , 2007 .

[18]  Andrew J. Woods,et al.  Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Barbara Froner,et al.  An application driven comparison of depth perception on desktop 3D displays , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Neil A. Dodgson,et al.  Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Martin G. H. Hiddink,et al.  2D/3D switchable displays , 2006, SPIE Photonics Europe.

[22]  Jonathan D. Pfautz,et al.  Depth Perception in Computer Graphics , 2000 .

[23]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.