Swimming muscles power suction feeding in largemouth bass

Significance Over one-half of all vertebrate species are ray-finned fishes. Across this extraordinary diversity, the most common feeding mode is suction feeding: rapid expansion of the mouth to suck in water and food. Here, we find that the power required for suction expansion is generated primarily by the axial swimming muscles. Rather than being restricted to the low power capacity of the small cranial muscles, suction-feeding fishes have co-opted the massive swimming muscles for this powerful feeding behavior. Therefore, the evolution of axial muscles in ray-finned fishes should now be considered in the context of feeding as well as locomotion, changing our perspective on musculoskeletal form and function in over 30,000 species. Most aquatic vertebrates use suction to capture food, relying on rapid expansion of the mouth cavity to accelerate water and food into the mouth. In ray-finned fishes, mouth expansion is both fast and forceful, and therefore requires considerable power. However, the cranial muscles of these fishes are relatively small and may not be able to produce enough power for suction expansion. The axial swimming muscles of these fishes also attach to the feeding apparatus and have the potential to generate mouth expansion. Because of their large size, these axial muscles could contribute substantial power to suction feeding. To determine whether suction feeding is powered primarily by axial muscles, we measured the power required for suction expansion in largemouth bass and compared it to the power capacities of the axial and cranial muscles. Using X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM), we generated 3D animations of the mouth skeleton and created a dynamic digital endocast to measure the rate of mouth volume expansion. This time-resolved expansion rate was combined with intraoral pressure recordings to calculate the instantaneous power required for suction feeding. Peak expansion powers for all but the weakest strikes far exceeded the maximum power capacity of the cranial muscles. The axial muscles did not merely contribute but were the primary source of suction expansion power and generated up to 95% of peak expansion power. The recruitment of axial muscle power may have been crucial for the evolution of high-power suction feeding in ray-finned fishes.

[1]  M. Muller,et al.  A quantitative hydrodynamical model of suction feeding in fish , 1982 .

[2]  Elizabeth L Brainerd,et al.  Role of axial muscles in powering mouth expansion during suction feeding in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  E. Brainerd,et al.  Bite force is limited by the force–length relationship of skeletal muscle in black carp, Mylopharyngodon piceus , 2013, Biology Letters.

[4]  P. Aerts,et al.  Model of jaw depression during feeding in Astatotilapia elegans (Teleostei: Cichlidae): Mechanisms for energy storage and triggering , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[5]  E. Brainerd,et al.  CONVERGENCE IN THE FEEDING MECHANICS OF ECOMORPHOLOGICALLY SIMILAR SPECIES IN THE CENTRARCHIDAE AND CICHLIDAE , 1993 .

[6]  G. Lauder Evolution of the feeding mechanism in primitive actionopterygian fishes: A functional anatomical analysis of Polypterus, Lepisosteus, and Amia , 1980, Journal of morphology.

[7]  T. Pietsch,et al.  High-Speed Cinematographic Evidence for Ultrafast Feeding in Antennariid Anglerfishes , 1979, Science.

[8]  Mark W. Westneat,et al.  Skull Biomechanics and Suction Feeding in Fishes , 2005 .

[9]  R. Marsh,et al.  Mechanical performance of scallop adductor muscle during swimming , 1992, Nature.

[10]  Peter Aerts,et al.  Extremely fast prey capture in pipefish is powered by elastic recoil , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  James Scaling of muscle performance during escape responses in the fish myoxocephalus scorpius L , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  A. Herrel,et al.  Functional basis for sexual differences in bite force in the lizard Anolis carolinensis , 2007 .

[13]  T. Higham,et al.  Suction power output and the inertial cost of rotating the neurocranium to generate suction in fish. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  D. B. Baier,et al.  X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. , 2010, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[15]  P. Aerts,et al.  A dynamic model of mouth closing movements in clariid catfishes: the role of enlarged jaw adductors. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  J. Grubich Prey Capture in Actinopterygian Fishes: A Review of Suction Feeding Motor Patterns with New Evidence from an Elopomorph Fish, Megalops atlanticus1 , 2001 .

[17]  P. Motta,et al.  Advances in the Study of Feeding Behaviors, Mechanisms, and Mechanics of Sharks , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[18]  P. Aerts,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  A. M. Carroll,et al.  Energetic limitations on suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Sven Gemballa,et al.  Spatial arrangement of white muscle fibers and myoseptal tendons in fishes. , 2002, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[21]  P. Anderson Using linkage models to explore skull kinematic diversity and functional convergence in arthrodire placoderms , 2010, Journal of morphology.

[22]  J M Wakeling,et al.  Muscle power output limits fast-start performance in fish. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  P. Aerts,et al.  Scaling of suction-feeding kinematics and dynamics in the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  P. Aerts,et al.  Interspecific variation in sternohyoideus muscle morphology in clariid catfishes: Functional implications for suction feeding , 2007, Journal of morphology.

[25]  V. Tchernavin The feeding mechanisms of a deep sea fish : Chauliodus sloani Schneider , 1953 .

[26]  H. Sabbah,et al.  Ventricular performance measured during ejection: Studies in patients of the rate of change of ventricular power. , 1976, American heart journal.

[27]  R. Marsh,et al.  The mechanical power output of the pectoralis muscle of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis): the in vivo length cycle and its implications for muscle performance. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  David B Baier,et al.  Scientific rotoscoping: a morphology-based method of 3-D motion analysis and visualization. , 2010, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[29]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  TEMPERATURE, MUSCLE POWER OUTPUT AND LIMITATIONS ON BURST LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE OF THE LIZARD DIPSOSAURUS DORSALIS , 1993 .

[30]  D. Coughlin,et al.  In vitro estimates of power output by epaxial muscle during feeding in largemouth bass. , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[31]  Peter Aerts,et al.  Vertical jumping in Galago senegalensis: the quest for an obligate mechanical power amplifier , 1998 .

[32]  D. Rosen,et al.  MAJOR ADAPTIVE LEVELS IN THE EVOLUTION OF THE ACTINOPTERYGIAN FEEDING MECHANISM , 1961 .

[33]  R. Holzman,et al.  Integrating the determinants of suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[34]  Peter C. Wainwright,et al.  Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  G. Lauder Patterns of Evolution in the Feeding Mechanism of Actinopterygian Fishes , 1982 .

[36]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[37]  Davies,et al.  How fish power predation fast-starts , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[38]  Peter C Wainwright,et al.  Muscle function and power output during suction feeding in largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.