Community Carrying Capacity

Scholars have explored the idea of the determinants of the size of the nonprofit sector as a linear relationship between supply of resources and the demand for nonprofit services. This in turn has fueled debate about whether there are too many nonprofits for available resources. In this article, we propose that the scarcity (or abundance) of resources does not inherently determine the limits of a community's nonprofit “carrying capacity”. Rather, network exchanges between nonprofits and other organizations may exhibit positive synergistic effects that are associated with diverse outcomes. We therefore propose a model of nonprofit carrying capacity that shifts the discussion to the ability of a community to support network exchanges among independent agents.

[1]  J. Schellenberg.  DEPENDENCE AND COOPERATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[2]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations , 1992 .

[3]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE MIXED ECONOMY , 1991 .

[4]  R. Lasker,et al.  Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[6]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[7]  J. Lincoln.  THE URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS , 1977 .

[8]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[9]  J. Corbin.  A Study of Factors Influencing the Growth of Nonprofits in Social Services , 1999 .

[10]  J. Wolch,et al.  The Intrametropolitan Geography of Poverty and the Nonprofit Sector in Southern California , 2003 .

[11]  Ha Hoang,et al.  Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review , 2003 .

[12]  A. Hunter,et al.  The Interorganizational Network as a Resource: A Comparative Case Study on Organizational Genesis. , 1985 .

[13]  Is the Government Failure Theory Still Relevant? A Panel Analysis Using Us State Level Data , 2004 .

[14]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  Understanding Collaboration Outcomes From an Extended Resource-Based View Perspective: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics, Partner Attributes, and Network Structures† , 2007 .

[15]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates , 2002 .

[16]  F. Fukuyama.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[18]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[19]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[20]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships , 2005 .

[22]  Jessica E. Sowa,et al.  The Impact of Nonprofit Collaboration in Early Child Care and Education on Management and Program Outcomes , 2006 .

[23]  Chao Guo,et al.  Understanding Collaboration Among Nonprofit Organizations: Combining Resource Dependency, Institutional, and Network Perspectives , 2005 .

[24]  Mario Luis Small,et al.  Neighborhood Institutions as Resource Brokers: Childcare Centers, Interorganizational Ties, and Resource Access among the Poor , 2006 .

[25]  William E. Loges,et al.  Neighborhood Governance Reform and Networks of Community Power in Los Angeles , 2006 .

[26]  J. Brudney,et al.  The Purpose (and Perils) of Government-Nonprofit Partnership , 2007 .

[27]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages , 1978 .

[28]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[29]  K. Provan,et al.  A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems , 1995 .

[30]  R. Florida.  Toward the Learning Region , 1995 .

[31]  Joseph Galaskiewicz,et al.  An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979-81, 1987-89 , 1997 .

[32]  Anita Chandra,et al.  Core dimensions of connectivity in public health collaboratives. , 2008, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[33]  M. Tracy,et al.  Collaboration Among Rural Nonprofit Organizations , 2000 .

[34]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Organizations , 2006 .

[35]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[36]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative , 2006 .

[37]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[38]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[39]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education * , 2001 .

[40]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government , 1995 .

[42]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test , 1989 .

[43]  H. Anheier.  Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy , 2005 .

[44]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[45]  G. Fields,et al.  Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley , 1999 .

[46]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[47]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori , 2000 .

[48]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  The Evolution of Dyadic Interorganizational Relationships in a Network of Publicly Funded Nonprofit Agencies , 2005 .

[49]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Principles for Controlling Agents: The Political Economy of Network Structure , 1998 .

[50]  H. Milward,et al.  Dark Networks as Problems , 2003 .

[51]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[52]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  To Manage Is to Govern , 2002 .

[54]  L. Paarlberg,et al.  Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Nonprofit Sector: Theory and Preliminary Findings , 2001 .

[55]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[56]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[57]  P. Norris.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[58]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[59]  W. Bielefeld.  Metropolitan Nonprofit Sectors: Findings from NCCS Data , 2000 .

[60]  J. Perry,et al.  Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box , 2006 .

[61]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[62]  Lisa Blomgren Bingham,et al.  Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management , 2006 .

[63]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How to build collaborative advantage , 2004 .

[64]  Shirley Sagawa,et al.  Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value Through Business and Social Sector Partnerships , 1999 .