Comparison of travel mode choice between taxi and subway regarding traveling convenience

In this study, we investigate travel mode choice behavior between taxi and subway with an emphasis on the influence of traveling convenience. In the first stage, we examine the Origin-Destination (OD) points of Beijing taxi trips and compare these locations with the respective nearest subway station. Statistics reveal several interesting conclusions. First, for approximately 24.89% of all trips, no convenient subway connections exist between the OD pairs. As such, a taxi becomes the only viable choice. Second, for 80.23% of the remaining 75.11% of trips (equivalent to 60.26% of all trips), access distance from either the origin or the destination to the nearest subway station is greater than 500 meters. This phenomenon indicates that walking distance plays an important role in travel mode choice. In the second stage, we examine groups of taxi trips with similar travel distances and travel times to reveal common features. We establish a preference rule in terms of travel distance and travel time. This determines whether an individual driver will take a taxi or the subway, using a pairwise comparison-based preference regression model. Tests indicate that more than 95% of taxi trips can be correctly predicted by this preference rule. This conclusion reveals that traveling convenience dominates the travel model choice between taxi and subway. All these findings shed light on the factors that influence travel mode choice behavior.

[1]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[2]  Yasuo Asakura,et al.  Behavioural data mining of transit smart card data: A data fusion approach , 2014 .

[3]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[5]  Guangnian Xiao,et al.  Travel mode detection based on GPS track data and Bayesian networks , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[6]  Xiaohong Li,et al.  Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data , 2015 .

[7]  C. Abraham,et al.  The role of affect in UK commuters' travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[8]  D. Hensher,et al.  Prospect Theoretic Contributions in Understanding Traveller Behaviour: A Review and Some Comments , 2011 .

[9]  Kees Maat,et al.  Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: A large-scale application in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[10]  Theo Muller,et al.  Optimized Transfer Opportunities in Public Transport , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[11]  Yuan Tian,et al.  Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data , 2012, J. Geogr. Syst..

[12]  Li Li,et al.  Analysis of Taxi Drivers' Behaviors Within a Battle Between Two Taxi Apps , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Xuemei Zhu,et al.  Beyond Distance: Children’s School Travel Mode Choice , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Tim Ryley,et al.  An investigation into the feasibility of increasing rail use as an alternative to the car , 2015 .

[16]  David Lois,et al.  Cycle commuting intention: A model based on theory of planned behaviour and social identity , 2015, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[17]  D. Salon,et al.  Impact of Bus Rapid Transit and Metro Rail on Property Values in Guangzhou, China , 2014 .

[18]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Methodological challenges in modelling the choice of mode for a new travel alternative using binary stated choice data – The case of high speed rail in Norway , 2015 .

[19]  Yu-Chiun Chiou,et al.  Factors affecting public transportation usage rate: Geographically weighted regression , 2015 .

[20]  B. Verplanken,et al.  ATTITUDE VERSUS GENERAL HABIT -- ANTECEDENTS OF TRAVEL MODE CHOICE / , 1994 .

[21]  Niamh Murtagh,et al.  Multiple identities and travel mode choice for regular journeys , 2012 .

[22]  Min Yang,et al.  Travel Mode Choice Modeling: A Comparison of Bayesian Networks and Neural Networks , 2012 .

[23]  Fang Xiaofeng,et al.  The spacial and temporal effect on property value increment with the development of urban rapid rail transit:An empirical research , 2010 .

[24]  Wang Andong,et al.  Light rail or busway? A comparative evaluation for a corridor in Beijing , 1996 .

[25]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Inferring hybrid transportation modes from sparse GPS data using a moving window SVM classification , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[26]  J. Anable,et al.  All Work and No Play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes , 2005 .

[27]  Catherine T. Lawson,et al.  A GPS/GIS method for travel mode detection in New York City , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..