Context-dependent switching between proactive and reactive working memory control mechanisms in the right inferior frontal gyrus

A critical feature of higher cognitive functioning is the capacity to flexibly tailor information processing and behaviors to current situational demands. Recent neurocognitive models have been postulated to account for the dynamic nature of human executive processing by invoking two dissociable cognitive control modes, proactive and reactive control. These may involve partially overlapping, but temporally distinct neural implementation in the prefrontal cortex. Prior brain imaging studies exploring proactive control have mainly used tasks requiring only information about single-items to be retained over unfilled delays. Whether proactive control can also be utilized to facilitate performance in more complex working memory tasks, in which concurrent processing of intervening items and updating is mandatory during contextual cue maintenance remains an open question. To examine this issue and to elucidate the extent to which overlapping neural substrates underlie proactive and reactive control we used fMRI and a modified verbal 3-back paradigm with embedded cues predictive of high-interference trials. This task requires context information to be retained over multiple intervening trials. We found that performance improved with item-specific cues predicting forthcoming lures despite increased working memory load. Temporal dynamics of activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus suggest flexible switching between proactive and reactive control in a context-dependent fashion, with greater sustained responses elicited in the 3-back task involving context maintenance of cue information and greater transient responses elicited in the 3-back task absent of cues.

[1]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Daniel Y. Kimberg,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive efficiency , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Neurocomputational models of working memory , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Kahn,et al.  Striatal Dysfunction in Schizophrenia and Unaffected Relatives , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Sustained and Transient Neural Modulations in Prefrontal Cortex Related to Declarative Long-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Attention , 2007, Cortex.

[6]  R. Kahn,et al.  Reduced Proactive Inhibition in Schizophrenia Is Related to Corticostriatal Dysfunction and Poor Working Memory , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Kahn,et al.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Common prefrontal activations during working memory, episodic memory, and semantic memory , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  Nitin Tandon,et al.  Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: Electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Bart Rypma,et al.  When less is more and when more is more: The mediating roles of capacity and speed in brain-behavior efficiency. , 2009, Intelligence.

[14]  T. Braver,et al.  Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Isolating the neural mechanisms of age-related changes in human working memory , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Sustained and Transient Processing Components Engaged during Controlled Retrieval , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  I. Radermacher,et al.  Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: evidencefor a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in theright hemisphere , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociating State and Item Components of Recognition Memory Using fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography , 1988 .

[21]  E. Rolls Neurophysiology and cognitive functions of the striatum. , 1994, Revue neurologique.

[22]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Responding with Restraint: What Are the Neurocognitive Mechanisms? , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Vink,et al.  On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  M. Raichle,et al.  Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography , 1991, Nature.

[29]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Motivational influences on cognitive control: Behavior, brain activation, and individual differences , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[30]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Individual Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Area 17 Predict the Time to Evaluate Visualized Letters , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Mapping interference resolution across task domains: A shared control process in left inferior frontal gyrus , 2009, Brain Research.

[32]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Neural Systems Underlying Attention and Arousal During the Performance of an Auditory Vigilance Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  G. de Marco,et al.  Alertness in young healthy subjects: An fMRI study of brain region interactivity enhanced by a warning signal , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Kristen L. Mackiewicz,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: A neural perspective with implications for psychopathology , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[38]  T. Braver,et al.  Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. , 2007 .

[39]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Staying responsive to the world: Modality‐specific and ‐nonspecific contributions to speeded auditory, tactile, and visual stimulus detection , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[40]  Deanna M. Barch,et al.  Extracting core components of cognitive control , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  T. Braver,et al.  Attention, intention, and strategy in preparatory control , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[44]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[45]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  James K. Nelson,et al.  Selection requirements during verb generation: differential recruitment in older and younger adults , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  T. Braver The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  M. Vink,et al.  Expectations and violations: Delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[49]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[50]  T. Braver,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control in Working Memory: Effects of Interference Expectancy and Fluid Intelligence , 2010, PloS one.

[51]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Dual pathways connecting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with the hippocampal formation and parahippocampal cortex in the rhesus monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[52]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Strategy-dependent changes in memory: Effects on behavior and brain activity , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[53]  Steven E. Petersen,et al.  The mixed block/event-related design , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  P. Strick,et al.  Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. , 1994, Science.

[55]  Katharine N. Thakkar,et al.  Response Inhibition and Response Monitoring in a Saccadic Countermanding Task in Schizophrenia , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[56]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[57]  Marc G. Berman,et al.  Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution , 2007, NeuroImage.