Branch cut surface placement for unwrapping of undersampled three-dimensional phase data: application to magnetic resonance imaging arterial flow mapping.

We demonstrate in both simulated and real cases the effect that undersampling of a three-dimensional (3D) wrapped phase distribution has on the geometry of phase singularity loops and their branch cut surfaces. The more intuitive two-dimensional (2D) problem of setting branch cuts between dipole pairs is taken as a starting point, and then branch cut surfaces in flat and ambiguous 3D loops are discussed. It is shown that the correct 2D branch cuts and 3D branch cut surfaces should be placed where the gradient of the original phase distribution exceeded pi rad voxel(-1). This information, however, is lost owing to undersampling and cannot be recovered from the sampled wrapped phase distribution alone. As a consequence, empirical rules such as finding the surface of minimal area or methods based on the wrapped phase gradient will fail to find the correct branch cut surfaces. We conclude that additional information about the problem under study is therefore needed to produce correct branch cut surfaces that lead to an unwrapped phase distribution with minimum local errors. An example with real data is provided in which downsampled phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging data are successfully unwrapped when the position of the vessel walls and the physical properties of the flowing blood are taken into account.

[1]  J. M. Huntley,et al.  Three-dimensional noise-immune phase unwrapping algorithm. , 2001, Applied optics.

[2]  J. M. Huntley,et al.  Temporal phase-unwrapping algorithm for automated interferogram analysis. , 1993, Applied optics.

[3]  J. M. Huntley Noise-immune phase unwrapping algorithm. , 1989, Applied optics.

[5]  Y L Hu,et al.  Vessel boundary extraction based on a global and local deformable physical model with variable stiffness. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  B. Blümich,et al.  Rheology of blood by NMR. , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[7]  B. Tabarrok,et al.  GENERATION OF SURFACES VIA EQUILIBRIUM OF FORCES , 1999 .

[8]  J M Huntley,et al.  Extending the dynamic range of phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity imaging using advanced higher-dimensional phase unwrapping algorithms , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  R.W. Dutton,et al.  Improving geometric model construction for blood flow modeling , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[10]  J. S. Brew,et al.  Computational form‐finding of tension membrane structures—Non‐finite element approaches: Part 1. Use of cubic splines in finding minimal surface membranes , 2003 .

[11]  R. Cusack,et al.  New Robust 3-D Phase Unwrapping Algorithms: Application to Magnetic Field Mapping and Undistorting Echoplanar Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  D J Bone,et al.  Fourier fringe analysis: the two-dimensional phase unwrapping problem. , 1991, Applied optics.

[13]  J. R. Buckland,et al.  Unwrapping noisy phase maps by use of a minimum-cost-matching algorithm. , 1995, Applied optics.

[14]  K. Cunningham,et al.  The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis , 2005, Laboratory Investigation.

[15]  S. Chavez,et al.  Understanding phase maps in MRI: a new cutline phase unwrapping method , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Fast, automated, N‐dimensional phase‐unwrapping algorithm , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.