The evolution of an Urban deer-management program through 15 years†

The Borough of Fox Chapel, Pennsylvania, USA implemented an urban deer-management program in 1993 consisting of archery hunting, sharpshooting by police officers, and trapping and euthanasia. Over the following 15 years, 2,980 deer were removed using these methods with most (68%) being harvested by archery hunters. However, over the duration of the program the number of bowhunters and number of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) harvested by bowhunters declined, resulting in greater reliance on police sharpshooting to compensate for the lower harvest by archery hunters. Beginning in 2003, the number of deer removed by police sharpshooters exceeded that removed by archery hunters. The combined deer-management program has been successful in reducing the negative impacts of overabundant deer as measured by the number of deer–vehicle collisions, which declined from 81 in 1993 to a 15-year low of 19 in 2007, potentially saving residents some US$ 1.6 million in vehicle repair costs. Although leadership within the Borough changed over time, the primary goals of the deer population management program were sustained. Urban communities entering into a deer management program should craft a program that has built-in flexibility and be prepared to allow the program to evolve over time as conditions change. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.

[1]  J. S. Barclay,et al.  Use of Bait to Increase Archery Deer Harvest in an Urban–Suburban Landscape , 2010 .

[2]  H. Kilpatrick,et al.  Factors Affecting Bowhunter Access in Suburban Areas , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  Reduction and Maintenance of a White-Tailed Deer Herd in Central Massachusetts , 2007 .

[4]  D. Drake,et al.  Counting a suburban deer population using Forward-Looking Infrared radar and road counts , 2005 .

[5]  G. Warner,et al.  Assessing strategies to improve bowhunting as an urban deer management tool , 2004 .

[6]  W. F. Porter,et al.  MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR, DISPERSAL, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LOCALIZED MANAGEMENT OF DEER IN A SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[7]  W. D. Klimstra,et al.  A Controlled Deer Hunt on Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge , 1969 .

[8]  J. Beringer,et al.  Evaluation of aerial thermal imaging for detecting white-tailed deer in a deciduous forest environment , 2003 .

[9]  Ernie P. Wiggers,et al.  Comparison of 4 methods to reduce white-tailed deer abundance in an urban community , 2001 .

[10]  T. L. Brown,et al.  The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. , 2000 .

[11]  W. D. Walter,et al.  A controlled archery deer hunt in a residential community: cost, effectiveness, and deer recovery rates. , 1999 .

[12]  D. Decker,et al.  SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIONS IN SUBURBAN AREAS : 3 CASES FROM NEW YORK , 1999 .

[13]  H. Kilpatrick,et al.  EFFECTS OF ARCHERY HUNTING ON MOVEMENT AND ACTIVITY OF FEMALE WHITE-TAILEDDEER IN AN URBAN LANDSCAPE , 1999 .

[14]  Conover,et al.  Review of Human Injuries, Illnesses, and Economic Losses Caused by Wildlife in the United States , 1995 .

[15]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF RISK FROM DEER-RELATED VEHICLE ACCIDENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR DEER HERD SIZE , 1993 .