Evaluation of Ortho VITROS and Roche Elecsys S and NC Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveillance Applications

Seroprevalence studies like the U.S. Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Study (NBDS) have been critical in monitoring SARS-CoV-2 epidemic activity. ABSTRACT SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies are instrumental in monitoring epidemic activity and require well-characterized, high-throughput assays, and appropriate testing algorithms. The U.S. Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Study performed monthly cross-sectional serological testing from July 2020 to December 2021, implementing evolving testing algorithms in response to changes in pandemic activity. With high vaccine uptake, anti-Spike (S) reactivity rates reached >80% by May 2021, and the study pivoted from reflex Roche anti-nucleocapsid (NC) testing of Ortho S-reactive specimens to parallel Ortho S/NC testing. We evaluated the performance of the Ortho NC assay as a replacement for the Roche NC assay and compared performance of parallel S/NC testing on both platforms. Qualitative and quantitative agreement of Ortho NC with Roche NC assays was evaluated on preselected S/NC concordant and discordant specimens. All 190 Ortho S+/Roche NC+ specimens were reactive on the Ortho NC assay; 34% of 367 Ortho S+/Roche NC- specimens collected prior to vaccine availability and 43% of 37 Ortho S-/Roche NC+ specimens were reactive on the Ortho NC assay. Performance of parallel S/NC testing using Ortho and Roche platforms was evaluated on 200 specimens collected in 2019 and 3,903 study specimens collected in 2021. All 200 pre-COVID-19 specimens tested negative on the four assays. Cross-platform agreement between Roche and Ortho platforms was 96.4% (3,769/3,903); most discordant results had reactivity close to the cutoffs on the alternate assays. These findings, and higher efficiency and throughput, support the use of parallel S/NC testing on either Roche or Ortho platforms for large serosurveillance studies. IMPORTANCE Seroprevalence studies like the U.S. Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Study (NBDS) have been critical in monitoring SARS-CoV-2 epidemic activity. These studies rely on serological assays to detect antibodies indicating prior infection. It is critical that the assays and testing algorithms used in seroprevalence studies have adequate performance (high sensitivity, high specificity, ability to discriminate vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibodies, etc.), as well as appropriate characteristics to support large-scale studies, such as high throughput and low cost. In this study we evaluated the performance of Ortho’s anti-nucleocapsid assay as a replacement for the Roche anti-nucleocapsid assay and compared performance of parallel anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid testing on both platforms. These data demonstrate similar performance of the Ortho and Roche anti-nucleocapsid assays and that parallel anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid testing on either platform could be used for serosurveillance applications.

[1]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Changing Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among Canadian Blood Donors during the Vaccine Era , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[2]  B. Biggerstaff,et al.  Evaluation of Commercially Available High-Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays for Serosurveillance and Related Applications , 2022, Emerging infectious diseases.

[3]  H. Whitaker,et al.  Nucleocapsid antibody positivity as a marker of past SARS-CoV-2 infection in population serosurveillance studies: impact of variant, vaccination, and choice of assay cut-off , 2021, medRxiv.

[4]  E. Sabino,et al.  Intense SARS-CoV-2 transmission among affluent Manaus residents preceded the second wave of the epidemic in Brazil , 2021, The Lancet Global Health.

[5]  Noam Brown,et al.  Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021. , 2021, JAMA.

[6]  Marek Orzechowski,et al.  SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody persistence in COVID‐19 convalescent plasma donors: Dependency on assay format and applicability to serosurveillance , 2021, Transfusion.

[7]  S. Kleinman,et al.  Use of US Blood Donors for National Serosurveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibodies: Basis for an Expanded National Donor Serosurveillance Program , 2021, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  Marcio K. Oikawa,et al.  Three-quarters attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Brazilian Amazon during a largely unmitigated epidemic , 2020, Science.

[9]  D. Clifton,et al.  Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[10]  R. V. van Lier,et al.  Low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in blood donors in the early COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands , 2020, Nature Communications.

[11]  E. Petinaki,et al.  Repeated leftover serosurvey of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, Greece, March and April 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[12]  J. Scott,et al.  Seroprevalence of anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Kenyan blood donors , 2020, Science.

[13]  A. Flahault,et al.  Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study , 2020, The Lancet.

[14]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Cumulative incidence and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in New York , 2020, Annals of Epidemiology.

[15]  Daniel S. Chertow,et al.  Sensitivity in Detection of Antibodies to Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2020, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  Jens K. Boldsen,et al.  Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Fatality Rate by Real-time Antibody Screening of Blood Donors , 2020, medRxiv.

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .