Tuning Monte Carlo Models to Reproduce Cosmic Radiation Interacting with the Earth’s Atmosphere

In this work, we performed a comparative study between HIJING, Sibyll, and QGSJET model-based event generators. Such Monte Carlo (MC) models are used to simulate the interaction and propagation of high-energy cosmic radiation (e.g., coming from the sun) with the Earth’s atmosphere. The global event observables selected for the study were the transverse momentum (pT) spectra and rapidity density distributions of strange particles (KS0, Λ, and Ξ−). This study was performed in the STAR and CMS fiducial phase spaces by simulating the strange particles in pp collisions at s = 200 GeV, 900 GeV, and 7 TeV, and the simulations were then compared to the experimental measurements. It was observed that none of the discussed model-based event generators ultimately predicted the experimental results, except QGSJET, which generally agrees reasonably with the data. However, QGSJET does not produce Ξ particles; therefore, it does not provide any predictions for Ξ. The other two models reproduced the data only in a limited rapidity or transverse momentum region while mainly underpredicting the data in the rest of the areas. These cosmic radiation simulation models are capable of covering the mid-rapidity regions of density distributions. Utilizing model-based observations, some fundamental parameters can be re-tuned and extrapolations to the highest energies can be investigated. Furthermore, these observations can provide valuable insights that could potentially constrain and improve perturbative- and non-perturbative-based QCD event generators, thereby facilitating a better understanding of the underlying physics.

[1]  A. H. Haj Ismail,et al.  Study of Bulk Properties of Strange Particles in Au+Au Collisions at sNN = 54.4 GeV , 2022, Entropy.

[2]  M. Waqas,et al.  Pseudorapidity dependence of the bulk properties of hadronic medium in pp collisions at 7 TeV , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[3]  M. Waqas,et al.  Bulk properties of the medium in comparison with models’ predictions in pp collisions at 13 TeV , 2022, The European Physical Journal Plus.

[4]  M. Waqas,et al.  Pseudorapidity dependence of the p T spectra of charged hadrons in pp collisions at √s = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV , 2022, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics.

[5]  M. Waqas,et al.  Study of $$p_{T}$$ spectra of light particles using modified Hagedorn function and cosmic rays Monte Carlo event generators in proton–proton collisions at $$\sqrt{s}$$ = 900 GeV , 2021, The European Physical Journal Plus.

[6]  A. H. Ismail Monte Carlo simulation of the cosmic muon charge ratio , 2021, Kuwait Journal of Science.

[7]  M. Waqas,et al.  Centrality dependence of PT distributions and nuclear modification factor of charged particles in Pb–Pb interactions at SNN=2.76 TeV , 2021, Results in Physics.

[8]  M. Waqas,et al.  An evidence of triple kinetic freezeout scenario observed in all centrality intervals in Cu-Cu, Au-Au and Pb-Pb collisions at high energies , 2021, 2101.07971.

[9]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Model Prediction of Transverse Momentum Spectra of Strange Hadrons in pp Collisions at √s = 200 GeV , 2020, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[10]  T. Gaisser,et al.  Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3d and extensive air showers , 2020, Physical Review D.

[11]  M. Waqas,et al.  Energy scan/dependence of kinetic freeze-out scenarios of multi-strange and other identified particles in central nucleus–nucleus collisions , 2020, The European Physical Journal A.

[12]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Model predictions of charge particle densities and multiplicities in the forward region at 7 TeV , 2020, Modern Physics Letters A.

[13]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Study of the Production of Strange Particles in Proton–Proton Collisions at √s = 0.9 TeV , 2020, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[14]  M Zahid Hasan,et al.  Event by Event Studies of Au-Au Collisions at √(S_NN )=200 GeV Using Two Event Generators , 2019 .

[15]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Hadron production models’ prediction for pT distribution of charged hadrons in pp interactions at 7 TeV , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[16]  I. collaboration Cosmic ray spectrum and composition from PeV to EeV using 3 years of data from IceTop and IceCube , 2019, Physical Review D.

[17]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Models prediction of hadrons production ratios in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV , 2019, Modern Physics Letters A.

[18]  M. Ajaz,et al.  Spectra of strange hadrons and their role in neutrinos flux prediction , 2018, EPL (Europhysics Letters).

[19]  Y. Ali,et al.  The production of π±, K±, p and p̄ in p–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV , 2018, Modern Physics Letters A.

[20]  L. Calcagni,et al.  LHC updated hadronic interaction packages analyzed up to cosmic-ray energies , 2017, Physical Review D.

[21]  Samir R Das,et al.  Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton–proton collisions , 2017, Nature Physics.

[22]  J. G. Contreras,et al.  Pseudorapidity and transverse-momentum distributions of charged particles in proton-proton collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{\textit s}}$ = 13 TeV , 2015, 1509.08734.

[23]  D. Elia Strange and identified particle production with ALICE at the LHC , 2015 .

[24]  G. C. Barbarino,et al.  The PAMELA Mission: Heralding a new era in precision cosmic ray physics , 2014 .

[25]  J. M. Park,et al.  Cosmic Ray Energetics And Mass for the International Space Station (ISS-CREAM) , 2014, Proceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019).

[26]  D. Volyanskyy,et al.  Strange particle production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt {s} = 0.9 $ and 7 TeV , 2011, 1102.4282.

[27]  S. Ostapchenko,et al.  Monte Carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in enhanced Pomeron scheme: I. QGSJET-II model , 2010, 1010.1869.

[28]  The Cms Collaboration Transverse-momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV , 2010, 1005.3299.

[29]  M. Z. Mehta,et al.  Transverse-momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 0.9 $ and 2.36 TeV , 2010 .

[30]  P. Lévai,et al.  Nonperturbative enhancement of heavy quark-pair production in a strong SU(2) color field , 2009, 0909.2323.

[31]  H. Gies,et al.  Pair Production Beyond the Schwinger Formula in Time-Dependent Electric Fields , 2008, 0807.2785.

[32]  E. al.,et al.  Measurements of Strange Particle Production in $p+p$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 200 GeV , 2006, nucl-ex/0607033.

[33]  G. Bruno Rapidity distributions of strange particles in Pb-Pb at 158 AGeV , 2005, nucl-ex/0511022.

[34]  S. Ostapchenko QGSJET-II: Towards reliable description of very high energy hadronic interactions , 2004, hep-ph/0412332.

[35]  Lev I. Dorman,et al.  * * * * * 20% conference discount * * * * * Cosmic Rays in the Earth's Atmosphere and Underground , 2004 .

[36]  K. Kampert Cosmic rays and particle physics , 2001, astro-ph/0101331.

[37]  A. Dumitru,et al.  Inverse slope systematics in high-energy p+p and Au+Au reactions 1 Supported by AvH Foundation and D , 1998, hep-ph/9810378.

[38]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo program for parton and particle production in high energy hadronic and nuclear collisions , 1994, nucl-th/9502021.

[39]  Fletcher,et al.  SIBYLL: An event generator for simulation of high energy cosmic ray cascades. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[40]  C. Pajares,et al.  Effects of interaction of strings in the dual parton model , 1992 .

[41]  Wang,et al.  Systematic study of particle production in p+p (p-bar) collisions via the HIGING model. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[42]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  HIGING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp, pA, and AA collisions. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[43]  D. Soper,et al.  Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD , 1989, hep-ph/0409313.

[44]  Hong,et al.  QCD and rising cross sections. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[45]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  Quark and gluon pair production in SU(N) covariant constant fields , 1985 .

[46]  T. Sjöstrand,et al.  Parton fragmentation and string dynamics , 1983 .

[47]  U. Sukhatme,et al.  Soft multihadron production from partonic structure and fragmentation functions , 1980 .

[48]  M. Baker,et al.  Gribov's Reggeon Calculus: Its Physical Basis and Implications , 1976 .

[49]  W. D. Walker,et al.  Diffraction Dissociation of Beam Particles , 1960 .

[50]  R. Maze,et al.  Extensive Cosmic-Ray Showers , 1939 .

[51]  P. G. Isar,et al.  Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 2 . 5 × 1018 eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory , 2020 .

[52]  M. Keller Qcd And Collider Physics , 2016 .

[53]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  A Systematic Study of Particle Production in p + p(jj) Collisions via the HIJING Model , 2013 .

[54]  R. Suarez Strange Particle Production in $pp$ Collisions at $\sqrts=0.9$ and 7 TeV , 2011 .

[55]  M. Gyulassy,et al.  HIJING : A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp , p A , and A A collisions , 2011 .

[56]  A. Białas,et al.  Chromoelectric flux tubes and the transverse-momentum distribution in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions. , 1985, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[57]  H. Nielsen,et al.  Colour rope model for extreme relativistic heavy ion collisions , 1984 .

[58]  Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 2 . 5 × 10 18 eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory , 2022 .